要 🗿⃤⃢SME — CS2 Stats

SE76561198057365964[U:1:97100236]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

5,913Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since

5,075Hours in CS37Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player

CSDB Leaderboard#221007 of 251929 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 2,120 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle

Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (27 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,120 → 2,120

+125Tracked matches · now 5,913

−10.0ppWin rate · 66.7% → 56.7%

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 2,120 +0 29 Aug – 18 Sept · 2 observations

2,120Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB

21Days played since 2026-08-29

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,120
Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 380 to go
Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

Metric	Last 30	Previous 30	Change
Matches	134	—	—
Win rate	54%	—	—
K/D	0.99	—	—
Headshot %	40%	—	—

Measured 13 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,591), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	38.0%	48.2%	50.9%	13.0% short
Shot accuracy	12.2%	13.3%	13.7%	1.5% short
Kill/death ratio	0.95	1.07	1.09	0.13 short
Match win rate	50.4%	46.9%	48.4%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83

Positioning64

Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46–53–1Last 10046%Win rateWWWLLWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · +15ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

3–2 · 60% win rate
Avg rating 0.04
Avg headshot accuracy 13%
Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

7–3 · 70% win rate
Avg rating 0.02
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 517ms

Last 20

11–9 · 55% win rate
Avg rating 0.01
Avg headshot accuracy 15%
Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.9 against its own average).

Aim8.3

Utility5.3

Positioning6.4

Opening Duels5.9

Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Plays most like m0NESY 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3

Positioning6.4

Utility5.3

Mechanics6.4

Opening Duels6.4

Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.00

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01

Reaction time525ms−19ms

first ⅓ avg 544ms → last ⅓ avg 525ms

Headshot accuracy14.7%−0.2%

first ⅓ avg 14.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–5 · inferno, 27 Sept →

30%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · ancient, 1 Oct →

375msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · ancient, 21 Sept →

13–0Biggest win · dust2, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak

W3Current streak

9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 63% over 8nukeWeakest map · 17% over 6

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	28	12–16	43%	0.00
ancient	B	23	12–11	52%	0.01
anubis	B	13	7–6	54%	0.02
overpass	A	8	5–3	63%	0.01
vertigo	C	7	3–4	43%	0.01
mirage	B	6	3–3	50%	-0.02
nuke	D	6	1–5	17%	-0.01
cache	C	5	2–3	40%	0.01
inferno	—	3	1–2	33%	0.09
debris	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (17% over 6). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

133,042Lifetime kills

0.95K/D

8,072Matches

50.4%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 9 players

38.0%Headshot %

12.2%Shot accuracy

23,066MVPs

3,072Hours (in match)

7,384Bombs planted

1,934Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,830

M4A4 / M4A1-S28,121

AWP12,286

P2000 / USP-S8,349

Desert Eagle8,202

Glock-186,258

XM10143,690

Galil AR3,604

MAC-102,678

FAMAS2,569

Lifetime map wins

9,639inferno

8,817dust2

8,357nuke

7,564vertigo

3,734train

717office

255italy

232cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,074Matches

51%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

79.8ADR

34%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win

24%1v2 clutch win

12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Ancient	286	54%	0.99	14.8
Anubis	152	48%	1.06	15.4
Nuke	148	53%	1.05	16.3
Overpass	88	45%	1.02	16.9
Vertigo	47	45%	0.89	15.0
Inferno	41	51%	0.92	15.8
Mirage	37	35%	0.76	13.6
Dust2	30	53%	0.99	16.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.6%Headshot accuracy

38.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

42.1%Spray accuracy

78.6%Counter-strafing

7.8°Preaim

534msReaction time

55.9%T opening success

55.3%CT opening success

0.65Enemies flashed / flash

11.2%Flash assists

7.18HE damage / grenade

6.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Best CS2 Crosshair
Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.
Headshot accuracy 14.6109% — below the 15% mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

17% win rate across 6 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
ancient	13–4	0.09	21%	14 Oct →
overpass	12–3	0.05	21%	13 Oct →
ancient	13–8	0.10	6%	13 Oct →
vertigo	13–16	0.01	8%	13 Oct →
overpass	4–13	-0.07	10%	13 Oct →
anubis	13–7	0.08	17%	13 Oct →
ancient	13–7	-0.03	11%	13 Oct →
ancient	5–13	-0.00	21%	13 Oct →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	13%	12 Oct →
cache	13–6	-0.00	20%	12 Oct →
mirage	8–13	-0.08	13%	12 Oct →
dust2	13–0	-0.01	23%	9 Oct →
nuke	4–13	-0.04	9%	9 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.00	15%	9 Oct →
ancient	3–13	-0.05	17%	8 Oct →
overpass	13–16	-0.01	16%	8 Oct →
anubis	13–10	0.09	23%	8 Oct →
ancient	13–11	-0.01	16%	8 Oct →
dust2	4–13	-0.00	2%	8 Oct →
vertigo	13–10	0.04	16%	8 Oct →
nuke	9–13	0.04	22%	7 Oct →
vertigo	13–4	0.06	17%	7 Oct →
dust2	11–13	0.01	8%	7 Oct →
ancient	2–13	-0.05	17%	7 Oct →
vertigo	13–11	0.07	13%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–9	0.00	15%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–8	-0.07	17%	7 Oct →
dust2	13–7	0.00	15%	7 Oct →
anubis	10–13	-0.06	13%	7 Oct →
inferno	8–8	0.10	18%	6 Oct →
anubis	13–7	0.07	13%	6 Oct →
ancient	5–13	0.04	11%	6 Oct →
overpass	19–16	0.02	11%	5 Oct →
dust2	13–11	0.02	10%	5 Oct →
anubis	7–13	0.01	5%	5 Oct →
anubis	13–4	-0.04	4%	5 Oct →
vertigo	9–13	-0.01	7%	5 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.01	15%	5 Oct →
dust2	9–13	0.01	11%	4 Oct →
anubis	18–22	-0.00	8%	4 Oct →
dust2	13–9	-0.01	7%	4 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	-0.03	16%	4 Oct →
overpass	13–9	0.03	5%	4 Oct →
ancient	7–13	-0.05	16%	4 Oct →
vertigo	10–13	-0.07	18%	3 Oct →
cache	11–13	-0.03	12%	3 Oct →
ancient	9–13	-0.01	18%	2 Oct →
overpass	5–13	0.04	21%	2 Oct →
dust2	9–13	-0.02	12%	2 Oct →
ancient	13–10	0.10	14%	2 Oct →
overpass	19–17	-0.02	19%	2 Oct →
anubis	13–3	0.01	13%	2 Oct →
dust2	6–13	-0.06	6%	1 Oct →
dust2	13–9	-0.00	8%	1 Oct →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	10%	1 Oct →
ancient	11–13	-0.04	11%	1 Oct →
nuke	11–13	-0.02	22%	1 Oct →
ancient	10–13	-0.01	30%	1 Oct →
nuke	8–13	-0.01	22%	1 Oct →
anubis	10–13	0.01	17%	30 Sept →
dust2	5–13	0.01	13%	30 Sept →
cache	8–13	0.03	19%	30 Sept →
mirage	12–16	0.01	14%	30 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.07	16%	30 Sept →
ancient	13–11	0.02	13%	29 Sept →
dust2	2–13	0.01	21%	29 Sept →
anubis	13–7	0.12	9%	29 Sept →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	14%	29 Sept →
cache	11–13	-0.04	20%	29 Sept →
overpass	13–10	0.02	16%	29 Sept →
mirage	13–8	0.06	17%	29 Sept →
ancient	13–10	-0.02	15%	28 Sept →
mirage	13–9	-0.04	8%	28 Sept →
dust2	16–14	0.01	11%	28 Sept →
cache	13–10	0.08	16%	28 Sept →
anubis	13–9	0.06	7%	28 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.11	15%	28 Sept →
nuke	13–6	0.02	14%	28 Sept →
dust2	5–13	-0.07	23%	27 Sept →
inferno	2–13	-0.01	6%	27 Sept →
inferno	9–5	0.18	15%	27 Sept →
debris	5–9	-0.10	17%	26 Sept →
dust2	13–6	0.04	23%	24 Sept →
dust2	7–13	0.08	19%	24 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.07	4%	24 Sept →
ancient	13–9	-0.03	16%	24 Sept →
dust2	7–13	-0.02	8%	24 Sept →
ancient	6–13	-0.04	18%	24 Sept →
ancient	11–13	0.05	11%	23 Sept →
dust2	14–16	-0.01	11%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–3	0.10	13%	23 Sept →
mirage	13–11	-0.00	17%	23 Sept →
dust2	13–10	-0.00	11%	22 Sept →
dust2	8–13	-0.00	19%	22 Sept →
dust2	7–1	0.03	22%	22 Sept →
dust2	11–13	-0.04	14%	22 Sept →
anubis	4–13	-0.04	22%	21 Sept →
anubis	5–13	-0.06	10%	21 Sept →
ancient	13–8	0.03	20%	21 Sept →
dust2	9–13	0.08	23%	21 Sept →