BE4S7

BE4S7 — CS2 Stats

76561198054869194[U:1:94603466]Steam profile ↗

818Tracked matches53%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,860Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingPassive Rifler
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning43
Utility34

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY58411Last 10058%Win rateWWLLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive RiflerAim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9
Aggression4.0
Utility3.4
Positioning4.3
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 40% on CT to 24% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 603ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning4.3
Utility3.4
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.1

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time598ms−29ms
first ⅓ avg 627ms → last ⅓ avg 598ms
Headshot accuracy15.4%+0.1%
first ⅓ avg 15.3% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — inferno 9–3
131Biggest win — cache
5Longest win streak
W2Current streak
138In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 69% over 26anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2618869%0.01
ancientA2012860%0.02
dust2A1710759%-0.01
cacheA95456%0.05
nukeC94544%0.01
anubisD72529%0.02
overpassA74357%0.02
mirageA53260%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

116,451Lifetime kills
1.91K/D · Top 5% of tracked players
3,910Matches
35.2%Match win rate
37.2%Headshot %
23.5%Shot accuracy · Top 1% of tracked players
6,795MVPs
1,265Hours (in match)
1,636Bombs planted
833Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4737,410
AWP16,794
P2503,540
SSG 082,724
P901,638
SG 5531,573

Lifetime map wins

4,275inferno
2,524dust2
878train
854cbble
842vertigo
801nuke
197lake
160office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

437Matches
53%Win rate
1.28Avg K/D
80.9ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis367%1.0919.7
Inferno3100%1.4516.3
Ancient250%1.4021.0
Dust210%1.1416.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.8%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.4%Spray accuracy
80.9%Counter-strafing
10.1°Preaim
603msReaction time
24.0%T opening success
40.1%CT opening success
0.37Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
9.74HE damage / grenade
1.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.37 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.0267% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategyAnubis grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–40.0610%24 Aug
anubis16–14-0.0317%5 Aug
cache8–13-0.0213%28 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0324%28 Jul
cache13–70.087%14 Jul
nuke13–110.0424%1 Jul
dust214–16-0.029%1 Jul
inferno16–14-0.0219%24 Jun
nuke7–130.0217%24 Jun
dust213–110.0318%17 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0316%17 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0724%17 Jun
nuke11–130.0513%17 Jun
cache13–70.0526%13 Jun
inferno13–11-0.0313%9 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0215%9 Jun
dust23–13-0.1111%8 Jun
dust214–16-0.0313%8 Jun
inferno10–130.0313%8 Jun
dust213–80.045%8 Jun
dust213–110.0130%5 Jun
inferno13–60.0111%27 May
dust213–7-0.0332%26 May
dust27–130.0125%26 May
ancient3–13-0.089%26 May
dust213–10-0.0118%25 May
inferno13–11-0.0014%24 May
ancient8–130.046%24 May
inferno13–6-0.060%24 May
inferno13–70.1415%19 May
dust26–13-0.0016%19 May
cache13–100.0714%15 May
ancient6–130.0412%15 May
inferno6–13-0.0719%15 May
cache13–10.0710%15 May
overpass3–13-0.0719%15 May
cache11–13-0.0113%15 May
inferno13–50.0315%15 May
cache12–120.1115%14 May
cache3–130.0414%14 May
inferno16–120.018%13 May
cache13–110.0619%12 May
ancient13–100.0812%10 May
dust213–11-0.0414%10 May
overpass16–120.0217%6 May
overpass10–130.0517%5 May
nuke5–130.0328%5 May
dust213–3-0.0213%3 May
mirage10–13-0.1020%3 May
anubis6–130.0514%3 May
inferno13–8-0.0321%2 May
ancient13–110.0012%20 Apr
dust213–80.0123%24 Mar
inferno13–9-0.0113%23 Mar
inferno16–140.0119%21 Mar
mirage7–13-0.0313%21 Mar
ancient7–13-0.0218%21 Mar
ancient14–16-0.0216%21 Mar
dust216–130.0311%17 Mar
inferno7–13-0.1013%17 Mar
ancient13–80.0710%17 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0124%9 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0416%9 Mar
ancient9–130.0216%9 Mar
inferno13–40.0922%8 Mar
nuke13–11-0.0221%8 Mar
mirage13–30.1431%2 Mar
ancient13–70.0213%28 Feb
ancient13–70.1014%26 Feb
nuke3–13-0.067%26 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0310%26 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0110%26 Feb
inferno13–80.0511%11 Feb
inferno0–20.0733%11 Feb
anubis9–13-0.029%11 Feb
mirage16–130.0117%11 Feb
ancient13–30.1417%10 Feb
inferno14–160.0515%10 Feb
ancient13–90.0418%7 Feb
inferno13–80.0125%7 Feb
dust29–13-0.029%7 Feb
ancient13–4-0.028%7 Feb
overpass13–100.0621%7 Feb
inferno13–90.0814%29 Jan
anubis8–13-0.0120%29 Jan
inferno13–6-0.0418%29 Jan
anubis13–40.1721%27 Jan
nuke13–8-0.0416%27 Jan
overpass5–13-0.0720%24 Jan
inferno11–13-0.0410%24 Jan
anubis9–130.0212%23 Jan
inferno9–30.2319%21 Jan
ancient13–10-0.0210%21 Jan
mirage13–60.0619%18 Jan
dust24–13-0.0119%18 Jan
nuke13–50.0913%15 Jan
overpass13–90.1122%30 Dec
overpass13–90.0618%30 Dec
ancient13–80.1413%30 Dec
ancient13–80.009%18 Dec

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →