MaSsO.ZK

MaSsO.ZK — CS2 Stats

SE76561198052200775[U:1:91935047]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,448Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,789Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.4 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,429 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (26 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,429 → 1,429
+2Tracked matches · now 2,448
+3.4ppWin rate · 37.9% → 41.4%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 52 days played since 31 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,916 -2,135 6 Feb27 Jun · 14 days played
18,91621,239peak 21,2396 Feb27 Jun
21,578Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,429Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
52Days played since 2026-01-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,429
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 102 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-28
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches4
Win rate25%
K/D1.19
Headshot %33%

Measured 28 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,070), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate38.7%45.7%46.8%8.1% short
Shot accuracy14.8%12.7%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.041.051.060.02 short
Match win rate46.9%45.7%46.3%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaSsO.ZKFACEITLevel 7 · 1,429 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,429csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim35
Positioning39
Utility74

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42526Last 10042%Win rateWLLLLTLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · −3.2pp headshot accuracy · −13ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Last 10

  • 451 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 8111 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.7 against its own average).

Aim3.5
Utility7.4
Positioning3.9
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 56% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.84 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 17% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 651ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.5
Positioning3.9
Utility7.4
Mechanics3.6
Opening Duels1.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.4/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time654ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 658ms → last ⅓ avg 654ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 17.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 9–6 · vertigo, 4 Jul
40%Best headshot accuracy · 3–13 · cache, 3 May
438msFastest reaction time · 13–9 · mirage, 1 Feb
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 10 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
65In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 68% over 25dust2Weakest map · 10% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2517868%0.00
infernoC1761135%-0.02
vertigoD1651131%-0.03
dust2D101910%-0.03
nukeD82625%-0.03
cacheD82625%-0.01
ancientB84450%-0.01
overpassC52340%-0.07
anubis220100%0.03
train110100%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (10% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

140,483Lifetime kills
1.04K/D
6,930Matches
46.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
38.7%Headshot %
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 7 players
19,161MVPs
3,347Hours (in match)
12,479Bombs planted
2,313Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP32,262
AK-4732,039
P903,557
P2503,353
MAC-103,198
MP92,884

Lifetime map wins

21,404inferno
13,331dust2
6,660vertigo
6,157nuke
594train
206lake
165cbble
31office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

857Matches
48%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
74.4ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage20946%1.1015.3
Inferno11153%1.1715.1
Vertigo7449%1.0815.1
Anubis2741%1.0715.6
Ancient2650%0.9414.6
Nuke2241%1.0014.9
Dust21040%1.1717.7
Overpass650%0.9515.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
31.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.4%Spray accuracy
66.2%Counter-strafing
12.0°Preaim
651msReaction time
16.9%T opening success
41.6%CT opening success
0.84Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
10.54HE damage / grenade
14.42Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 16.8918% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

10% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–90.0418%17 Sept
mirage7–130.0912%7 Sept
mirage11–13-0.038%21 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0716%15 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0617%14 Aug
mirage12–12-0.0715%12 Aug
nuke4–13-0.120%5 Aug
vertigo9–50.0115%5 Aug
cache13–8-0.0213%31 Jul
vertigo13–100.0213%31 Jul
vertigo3–9-0.1210%31 Jul
overpass9–13-0.1214%20 Jul
inferno9–13-0.0211%11 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0115%11 Jul
mirage13–90.1213%11 Jul
cache4–13-0.0820%11 Jul
mirage13–30.0130%10 Jul
mirage13–10.0314%10 Jul
vertigo2–13-0.079%10 Jul
cache13–110.0222%10 Jul
dust26–13-0.0819%9 Jul
vertigo0–13-0.0623%9 Jul
vertigo13–5-0.0318%8 Jul
mirage13–3-0.0422%8 Jul
vertigo9–60.1618%4 Jul
mirage13–11-0.0024%27 Jun
dust21–13-0.0716%27 Jun
mirage10–13-0.029%27 Jun
mirage13–7-0.0414%27 Jun
train13–20.0121%24 Jun
dust28–13-0.0517%19 Jun
overpass8–8-0.099%18 Jun
nuke9–50.0519%17 Jun
inferno9–5-0.0223%17 Jun
overpass9–50.0516%16 Jun
vertigo6–9-0.130%16 Jun
cache8–130.0425%15 Jun
overpass11–13-0.0915%14 Jun
dust211–13-0.0226%14 Jun
cache7–130.1110%31 May
dust26–130.0335%21 May
nuke7–13-0.0513%21 May
dust210–130.0129%20 May
mirage13–110.0319%16 May
vertigo12–120.0214%14 May
vertigo3–9-0.0531%7 May
cache3–13-0.0240%3 May
cache2–13-0.0912%3 May
cache12–12-0.077%2 May
ancient13–100.0515%2 May
nuke14–160.0017%2 May
inferno3–13-0.0218%2 May
vertigo6–9-0.0510%25 Apr
vertigo9–20.1321%25 Apr
inferno9–5-0.0711%24 Apr
inferno8–80.0511%24 Apr
inferno13–90.045%19 Apr
ancient7–13-0.0415%19 Apr
overpass9–7-0.1212%10 Apr
vertigo2–9-0.160%7 Apr
inferno5–13-0.0413%6 Apr
vertigo10–13-0.0619%6 Apr
inferno13–30.0332%6 Apr
nuke8–80.0213%5 Apr
inferno8–130.0322%5 Apr
mirage13–30.0020%5 Apr
inferno2–13-0.0718%5 Apr
vertigo7–90.0312%3 Apr
vertigo5–13-0.0911%2 Apr
mirage13–8-0.0224%21 Mar
mirage13–90.0023%21 Mar
inferno6–13-0.0128%20 Mar
dust29–130.0622%20 Mar
anubis13–30.0214%20 Mar
dust22–13-0.1418%19 Mar
mirage16–130.0415%19 Mar
inferno13–10-0.0514%19 Mar
nuke8–12-0.1522%14 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0714%14 Mar
mirage13–80.0323%21 Feb
ancient16–13-0.0122%21 Feb
nuke9–50.0526%19 Feb
inferno4–9-0.1517%18 Feb
mirage13–9-0.0111%17 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0316%16 Feb
mirage7–13-0.047%16 Feb
ancient4–13-0.0212%16 Feb
inferno10–13-0.0727%7 Feb
dust213–110.0216%7 Feb
mirage13–10-0.0315%7 Feb
mirage13–80.0214%7 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0018%6 Feb
dust20–13-0.078%6 Feb
mirage8–13-0.0113%6 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0117%6 Feb
inferno1–13-0.0121%6 Feb
mirage13–80.0721%6 Feb
ancient13–10-0.0216%1 Feb
mirage13–90.0219%1 Feb
inferno9–60.0622%31 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →