On aika viedä hipit töihin

On aika viedä hipit töihin — CS2 Stats

FI76561198051801517[U:1:91535789]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

432Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,781Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,582Top 25% of 213,399 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#48955 of 260000 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,582 +5,040 17 Jul – 25 Oct · 15 days played
17,54222,582peak 22,58217 Jul25 Oct
22,582Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-07-15

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,582
  • +4,197 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,418 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-15
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,496), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.0%44.8%45.7%3.7% short
Shot accuracy18.3%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio0.901.031.050.15 short
Match win rate43.0%45.2%45.7%2.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOn aika viedä hipit töihinFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER22,582 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87
Positioning51
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–47–2Last 10051%Win rateWWWLLWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 527ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim8.7
Utility4.0
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 36 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

CT openings. Opening success drops from 46% on T to 30% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7
Positioning5.1
Utility4.0
Mechanics8.1
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.03
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time524ms−102ms
first ⅓ avg 626ms → last ⅓ avg 524ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−1.6%
first ⅓ avg 17.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–7 · anubis, 16 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · mirage, 16 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · mirage, 24 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 24 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 72% over 25anubisWeakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageS2518–772%0.01
ancientC208–1240%0.00
anubisC197–1237%0.00
cacheB168–850%-0.01
nukeC104–640%-0.01
dust2A74–357%-0.01
inferno—32–167%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

87,931Lifetime kills
0.90K/D
4,180Matches
43.0%Match win rate
42.0%Headshot %
18.3%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 6 players
10,373MVPs
2,110Hours (in match)
5,950Bombs planted
1,141Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,048
AWP12,053
P902,712
Knife1,575
FAMAS1,499
P2501,483

Lifetime map wins

3,754dust2
3,468inferno
1,778nuke
1,611vertigo
1,517train
644cbble
108aztec
107office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,219Matches
50%Win rate
1.05Avg K/D
77.1ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3361%1.0414.5
Anubis2646%1.1015.4
Ancient1942%1.1816.7
Nuke1267%1.1717.5
Cache944%0.9213.0
Inferno650%1.0015.3
Dust2450%1.2617.5
Vertigo20%0.507.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.7%Headshot accuracy
39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
44.3%Spray accuracy
86.2%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
523msReaction time
46.2%T opening success
29.9%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
6.49HE damage / grenade
4.64Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3788 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 29.9359% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage13–110.0117%25 Oct →
inferno9–70.0520%25 Oct →
mirage13–10.0227%24 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0012%24 Oct →
cache9–130.0222%24 Oct →
mirage11–30.0817%24 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0220%24 Oct →
anubis13–90.0816%23 Oct →
inferno13–80.0312%23 Oct →
ancient13–80.1113%23 Oct →
ancient13–10.1123%23 Oct →
inferno3–110.0114%23 Oct →
anubis6–130.019%22 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0711%22 Oct →
ancient4–130.0036%22 Oct →
cache13–40.0117%20 Oct →
mirage13–30.0618%19 Oct →
anubis13–100.0712%18 Oct →
anubis13–70.1214%16 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0213%15 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0621%15 Oct →
cache13–70.0613%15 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0311%16 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0425%15 Sept →
nuke13–90.1017%14 Sept →
dust211–130.0015%9 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0813%6 Sept →
cache13–16-0.077%1 Sept →
dust211–130.0321%30 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0212%30 Aug →
ancient17–190.0510%28 Aug →
anubis13–90.0110%28 Aug →
mirage17–190.0116%26 Aug →
ancient11–130.017%25 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0211%25 Aug →
anubis7–13-0.0517%24 Aug →
cache12–16-0.0115%24 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0620%24 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.033%24 Aug →
mirage13–5-0.058%23 Aug →
anubis13–5-0.0312%23 Aug →
nuke13–100.0316%23 Aug →
cache2–130.0417%22 Aug →
cache16–12-0.0218%22 Aug →
ancient13–30.0810%22 Aug →
mirage13–90.0820%22 Aug →
mirage13–70.0416%22 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.057%22 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.078%21 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.0421%21 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.047%13 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.0722%13 Aug →
ancient13–80.0221%13 Aug →
cache13–6-0.0424%13 Aug →
nuke13–80.026%12 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.037%12 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.016%12 Aug →
ancient11–130.0020%11 Aug →
dust213–110.0320%9 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.045%9 Aug →
mirage16–140.0619%7 Aug →
ancient13–40.0118%7 Aug →
ancient13–90.0323%7 Aug →
nuke16–190.0019%6 Aug →
dust213–50.0017%6 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0219%5 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0521%5 Aug →
mirage13–100.0517%5 Aug →
cache13–60.0422%5 Aug →
anubis13–50.039%4 Aug →
mirage13–30.0230%4 Aug →
anubis10–130.0223%3 Aug →
anubis11–13-0.0416%3 Aug →
anubis8–130.0313%3 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0814%3 Aug →
nuke13–3-0.018%2 Aug →
cache15–15-0.0126%30 Jul →
mirage13–110.0618%30 Jul →
cache13–20.0111%30 Jul →
dust213–4-0.0520%30 Jul →
ancient10–130.0017%29 Jul →
mirage8–13-0.0327%29 Jul →
nuke11–130.0520%28 Jul →
anubis13–50.0317%28 Jul →
mirage13–90.0521%28 Jul →
mirage13–8-0.0016%27 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0829%27 Jul →
mirage13–11-0.0123%27 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.0433%17 Jul →
cache6–13-0.0819%17 Jul →
cache13–3-0.009%17 Jul →
mirage13–9-0.0716%17 Jul →
nuke9–13-0.027%17 Jul →
anubis11–13-0.0015%17 Jul →
ancient13–16-0.047%17 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0511%16 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0313%16 Jul →
mirage5–130.0440%16 Jul →
nuke2–13-0.1413%16 Jul →
ancient15–15-0.099%15 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.