King Rhoam

King Rhoam — CS2 Stats

NO76561198050901869[U:1:90636141]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

514Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,150Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.4 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating6,611Light Blue band · top ~71.1% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 22 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 4 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 6,611 -263 4 Jun22 Sept · 23 days played
4,0268,627peak 8,6274 Jun22 Sept
8,714Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2026-06-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,016 below peak (8,627)
  • +2,585 over 30 days · improving
  • +2,053 over 90 days
  • Next: Blue band at 10,000 3,389 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Light Blue band among CSDB-tracked players (n=8,820), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLight Blue band medianBlue band medianvs Blue band
Headshot rate34.3%39.9%41.9%7.6% short
Shot accuracy13.2%6.9%9.6%above
Kill/death ratio0.890.920.980.09 short
Match win rate42.9%42.3%43.8%0.9% short

This profile matches the typical Blue band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Blue band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGKing RhoamPREMIER6,611 · Light Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim64
Positioning56
Utility23

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47503Last 10047%Win rateLWLLLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +3.8pp headshot accuracy · −21ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 628ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 713 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim6.4
Utility2.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels4.1

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 590ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.4
Positioning5.6
Utility2.3
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels5.0
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time588ms−30ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 588ms
Headshot accuracy14.9%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.3% → last ⅓ avg 14.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 1–9 · mirage, 28 Aug
28%Best headshot accuracy · 13–16 · mirage, 17 Sept
438msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · dust2, 10 Sept
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 6 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
89In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 53% over 17infernoWeakest map · 38% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC27121544%0.00
dust2B179853%0.03
nukeB179853%0.01
infernoC1661038%0.00
ancientB157847%0.02
cache43175%-0.04
anubis2020%-0.01
vertigo110100%-0.04
overpass1010%-0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

45,599Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
2,673Matches
42.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Light Blue band
34.3%Headshot %
13.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Light Blue band
5,438MVPs
1,072Hours (in match)
2,298Bombs planted
471Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP8,953
AK-477,091
P902,292
SSG 081,921
SG 5531,384
XM10141,301

Lifetime map wins

7,105dust2
5,820inferno
2,125nuke
836vertigo
615office
355train
93cbble
40lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.1%Spray accuracy
73.7%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
590msReaction time
52.8%T opening success
46.9%CT opening success
0.32Enemies flashed / flash
2.9%Flash assists
9.00HE damage / grenade
1.63Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3166 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–130.0528%22 Sept
dust213–60.046%18 Sept
mirage13–16-0.0328%17 Sept
anubis10–13-0.026%17 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0820%17 Sept
mirage6–13-0.1019%13 Sept
ancient13–110.0424%13 Sept
cache13–11-0.0514%11 Sept
mirage13–110.0415%11 Sept
inferno2–13-0.0320%11 Sept
ancient5–130.0414%11 Sept
mirage13–90.0413%11 Sept
ancient13–60.046%11 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0113%11 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0117%11 Sept
nuke13–40.0017%11 Sept
dust211–13-0.0215%10 Sept
dust24–130.0214%10 Sept
dust25–13-0.0418%10 Sept
nuke14–160.0017%10 Sept
cache13–9-0.0419%9 Sept
dust215–15-0.0014%9 Sept
ancient6–130.097%9 Sept
nuke13–80.0124%8 Sept
dust213–110.046%8 Sept
nuke13–110.077%8 Sept
mirage9–130.0013%8 Sept
inferno10–13-0.0315%8 Sept
nuke13–9-0.0213%8 Sept
nuke6–130.0117%7 Sept
nuke10–130.0515%7 Sept
mirage15–15-0.046%7 Sept
mirage13–9-0.049%7 Sept
mirage2–130.0225%7 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0110%7 Sept
nuke13–40.0226%7 Sept
ancient13–16-0.0514%7 Sept
inferno13–20.0017%6 Sept
nuke13–40.0522%6 Sept
ancient13–60.0619%6 Sept
anubis6–13-0.017%6 Sept
mirage13–50.0313%6 Sept
dust213–80.073%6 Sept
dust210–130.037%6 Sept
mirage13–160.0013%6 Sept
mirage13–90.0111%6 Sept
inferno13–160.0618%5 Sept
nuke14–16-0.062%5 Sept
inferno13–100.0114%5 Sept
inferno13–100.0216%5 Sept
mirage6–130.0217%5 Sept
ancient14–160.0816%5 Sept
nuke3–13-0.0320%5 Sept
cache13–7-0.0015%5 Sept
mirage7–13-0.0220%5 Sept
mirage13–110.0320%4 Sept
inferno13–100.0715%4 Sept
ancient9–13-0.0516%4 Sept
nuke13–70.0621%4 Sept
dust213–50.0615%30 Aug
mirage4–130.0617%29 Aug
dust29–10.1118%28 Aug
nuke15–150.0518%28 Aug
mirage1–90.1211%28 Aug
dust213–4-0.0123%28 Aug
mirage13–9-0.0522%27 Aug
mirage13–50.056%27 Aug
mirage13–100.0912%26 Aug
dust213–100.0715%26 Aug
dust213–30.0919%25 Aug
mirage13–50.0116%24 Aug
inferno4–130.086%24 Aug
ancient13–80.044%24 Aug
ancient13–40.0717%23 Aug
mirage9–13-0.0115%22 Aug
inferno9–130.0228%20 Aug
dust211–130.0314%19 Aug
mirage14–16-0.0223%16 Aug
mirage3–13-0.0713%13 Aug
vertigo13–8-0.044%11 Aug
cache3–13-0.0715%11 Aug
inferno13–70.0215%11 Aug
mirage13–16-0.019%7 Aug
dust28–13-0.069%3 Aug
inferno3–13-0.1014%3 Aug
inferno5–13-0.076%19 Jul
nuke4–13-0.0718%19 Jul
dust211–130.0627%28 Jun
inferno13–2-0.0121%28 Jun
nuke16–130.0418%28 Jun
ancient13–80.016%28 Jun
overpass2–13-0.0822%28 Jun
mirage13–11-0.035%28 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0224%28 Jun
dust213–4-0.0518%28 Jun
inferno8–13-0.0927%14 Jun
ancient8–13-0.0810%5 Jun
ancient13–20.048%5 Jun
mirage13–7-0.083%5 Jun
inferno11–13-0.0214%4 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →