REVERSEDONK — CS2 Stats

76561198049453013[U:1:89187285]

775Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
674Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidAggressive Rifler
Premier CS Rating21,774Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#15794 of 56043 tracked
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,711), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate46.1%42.7%44.0%above
Shot accuracy12.2%10.8%11.6%above
Kill/death ratio1.141.001.03above
Match win rate52.1%44.1%45.1%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 5 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGREVERSEDONKFACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER21,774 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning61
Utility45

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53452Last 10053%Win rateLWLLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -60pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Aggressive RiflerTakes opening fights often, backed by a strong aim profile.

Aim7.0
Aggression8.5
Utility4.5
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels4.4

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: higher opening-fight frequency; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 39% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning6.1
Utility4.5
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time641ms+33ms
first ⅓ avg 608ms → last ⅓ avg 641ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+0.8%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.16Best rating — cache 13–7
132Biggest win — mirage
7Longest win streak
77In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 12ancientWeakest map · 30% over 10
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageA27171063%0.01
dust2C2191243%0.01
nukeB137654%0.02
cacheB137654%0.01
infernoS128467%0.02
ancientD103730%0.04
anubis21150%0.03
debris110100%0.08
office1010%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (30% over 10). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

31,052Lifetime kills
1.14K/D · Top 25% of Level 4 players
1,385Matches
52.1%Match win rate · Top 10% of Level 4 players
46.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
12.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 4 players
4,302MVPs
674Hours (in match)
1,277Bombs planted
414Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,104inferno
1,843dust2
1,431nuke
530vertigo
388train
340office
35cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.0%Headshot accuracy
36.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.7%Spray accuracy
78.7%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
644msReaction time
38.6%T opening success
56.9%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
8.6%Flash assists
9.15HE damage / grenade
4.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.5785% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

30% win rate across 10 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategyAncient grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke4–13-0.075%23 Jul
cache10–10.0113%23 Jul
dust213–160.0035%22 Jul
nuke11–130.0213%22 Jul
dust27–13-0.0511%22 Jul
dust28–13-0.0621%22 Jul
debris9–70.087%22 Jul
ancient10–130.0332%21 Jul
mirage13–90.0317%21 Jul
nuke11–130.1128%20 Jul
dust213–70.1128%20 Jul
mirage13–9-0.0315%20 Jul
cache13–11-0.0032%20 Jul
nuke13–70.0826%20 Jul
nuke13–60.0116%20 Jul
inferno13–30.0318%15 Jul
cache10–13-0.0515%15 Jul
cache13–8-0.0028%12 Jul
mirage13–2-0.0718%12 Jul
nuke13–60.0325%12 Jul
inferno13–10-0.0322%12 Jul
ancient13–4-0.0025%12 Jul
cache13–7-0.0230%12 Jul
cache15–15-0.0220%11 Jul
mirage13–70.067%11 Jul
mirage13–7-0.0012%10 Jul
mirage13–50.0436%10 Jul
ancient2–7-0.090%10 Jul
dust213–100.0321%10 Jul
cache7–13-0.0243%9 Jul
mirage6–13-0.0547%9 Jul
ancient13–90.1331%9 Jul
cache9–130.0223%8 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0724%5 Jul
mirage14–16-0.0426%4 Jul
mirage11–13-0.0322%3 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0221%3 Jul
mirage13–110.0018%3 Jul
inferno7–13-0.0127%3 Jul
dust213–60.0225%3 Jul
mirage13–40.0927%3 Jul
inferno13–40.0424%3 Jul
nuke8–130.0424%3 Jul
dust20–13-0.0731%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0731%3 Jul
mirage13–80.0225%3 Jul
dust23–13-0.0127%3 Jul
mirage13–60.0620%3 Jul
inferno9–130.0243%2 Jul
nuke8–13-0.0514%2 Jul
anubis7–13-0.0127%2 Jul
nuke16–12-0.0328%1 Jul
nuke13–20.1022%1 Jul
dust24–13-0.0428%1 Jul
mirage13–20.1531%1 Jul
mirage13–6-0.0520%1 Jul
mirage13–80.0129%1 Jul
dust27–13-0.0117%29 Jun
mirage13–90.0119%29 Jun
mirage13–50.0118%29 Jun
dust210–13-0.0323%28 Jun
dust25–13-0.0336%28 Jun
nuke13–110.0117%27 Jun
mirage8–13-0.0131%27 Jun
dust213–110.027%26 Jun
mirage9–130.0323%26 Jun
ancient10–130.0623%25 Jun
cache7–13-0.0524%25 Jun
ancient6–13-0.0330%25 Jun
dust213–160.0222%25 Jun
dust213–110.0816%25 Jun
dust25–13-0.0021%25 Jun
cache13–70.1624%24 Jun
mirage10–130.0020%24 Jun
ancient7–130.0821%24 Jun
inferno13–7-0.0227%24 Jun
anubis13–70.0623%24 Jun
inferno13–160.0137%24 Jun
mirage0–13-0.050%24 Jun
nuke0–13-0.116%24 Jun
dust213–100.0645%23 Jun
cache13–70.0138%23 Jun
cache11–130.0628%23 Jun
dust213–60.0515%23 Jun
dust27–130.0121%23 Jun
nuke13–50.0818%23 Jun
ancient11–130.1319%23 Jun
inferno13–80.1022%23 Jun
cache13–7-0.0216%22 Jun
mirage5–130.0215%22 Jun
mirage2–130.0019%22 Jun
mirage3–13-0.0617%22 Jun
dust213–50.0024%22 Jun
mirage13–11-0.0318%22 Jun
inferno13–80.0322%21 Jun
ancient13–60.1314%21 Jun
mirage13–90.0218%21 Jun
dust213–90.0213%21 Jun
inferno13–70.0521%21 Jun
office12–12-0.0623%21 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →