Mike Wh1skowski

Mike Wh1skowski — CS2 Stats

76561198048346236[U:1:88080508]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,443Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,162Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.2 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating18,813Top 50% of 205,709 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~13.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#98722 of 253292 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,813 -1,253 31 Jul – 17 Oct · 43 days played
16,59920,331peak 20,33131 Jul17 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,095 +0 28 Aug – 5 Sept · 2 observations
1,0951,095peak 1,09528 Aug5 Sept
20,331Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,095Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
44Days played since 2026-07-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,518 below peak (20,331)
  • +609 over 30 days · improving
  • -1,253 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,187 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,185), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate42.9%44.8%45.7%2.8% short
Shot accuracy17.3%12.4%12.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.091.031.05above
Match win rate43.9%45.2%45.7%1.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMike Wh1skowskiFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER18,813 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,095csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning51
Utility58

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–57Last 10043%Win rateWWLWLLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −1.5pp headshot accuracy · +52ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 651ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 625ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility5.8
Positioning5.1
Opening Duels0.8
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 47% on T to 31% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 601ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning5.1
Utility5.8
Mechanics4.5
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time609ms+16ms
first ⅓ avg 593ms → last ⅓ avg 609ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 20.1% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 9–0 · nuke, 14 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 0–2 · inferno, 1 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · ancient, 25 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W2Current streak
8–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 59% over 22dust2Weakest map · 25% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheA2213–959%-0.00
nukeB189–950%0.00
infernoD165–1131%-0.01
mirageD144–1029%-0.01
ancientB136–746%-0.01
dust2D82–625%-0.03
anubisB84–450%-0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.20

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

100,845Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 6 players
5,165Matches
43.9%Match win rate
42.9%Headshot %
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 6 players
9,934MVPs
2,162Hours (in match)
6,696Bombs planted
1,620Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

7,829inferno
7,727dust2
4,818nuke
2,995train
1,386cbble
1,039vertigo
382lake
84bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

194Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
77.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2348%1.0615.1
Nuke1926%0.8713.9
Ancient1844%1.1515.8
Inferno1464%1.0714.7
Dust21164%0.9915.4
Anubis956%1.0114.2
Overpass888%1.3520.8
Cache850%1.0114.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.9%Headshot accuracy
33.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.0%Spray accuracy
70.2%Counter-strafing
12.4°Preaim
601msReaction time
47.0%T opening success
31.4%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
4.5%Flash assists
10.33HE damage / grenade
9.01Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3959° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0413%17 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0219%17 Oct →
nuke7–130.0113%17 Oct →
cache13–20.0726%17 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0118%16 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0526%16 Oct →
inferno16–130.0121%15 Oct →
cache10–2-0.0911%15 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0214%15 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0125%12 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0228%10 Oct →
ancient6–130.0121%10 Oct →
cache16–130.0019%9 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0419%9 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0414%8 Oct →
dust213–100.0114%8 Oct →
ancient13–60.0821%8 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0214%8 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0011%7 Oct →
cache13–6-0.0041%6 Oct →
anubis13–110.017%6 Oct →
cache13–60.0319%4 Oct →
inferno13–100.049%3 Oct →
nuke9–130.1021%3 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0619%2 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0115%2 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.049%1 Oct →
ancient13–90.0420%1 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0623%1 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.0312%1 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.017%1 Oct →
inferno0–2-0.01100%1 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0510%1 Oct →
anubis13–110.0115%29 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0422%29 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0214%28 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0119%25 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0913%25 Sept →
ancient16–120.0122%25 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0623%25 Sept →
mirage13–10.108%25 Sept →
nuke11–130.0720%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0314%23 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0213%23 Sept →
inferno13–160.0319%19 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0120%18 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0516%17 Sept →
ancient13–10.019%15 Sept →
nuke13–40.0824%15 Sept →
cache13–70.0020%15 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.036%14 Sept →
cache10–130.0217%14 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0327%10 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0127%9 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0128%9 Sept →
cache9–130.0116%7 Sept →
vertigo5–9-0.2025%7 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.0226%7 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.1620%7 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0118%5 Sept →
cache13–30.016%5 Sept →
nuke16–130.0230%5 Sept →
mirage16–13-0.0718%4 Sept →
anubis10–130.0132%4 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0316%3 Sept →
inferno4–130.0124%3 Sept →
anubis13–100.0725%30 Aug →
cache8–13-0.043%30 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.070%29 Aug →
cache13–6-0.075%29 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0044%29 Aug →
cache6–13-0.057%23 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0919%20 Aug →
cache10–130.0228%20 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0011%18 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0012%15 Aug →
cache3–13-0.0118%14 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0750%14 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0210%14 Aug →
nuke9–00.1422%14 Aug →
ancient13–110.0226%14 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0320%14 Aug →
nuke0–13-0.0658%14 Aug →
mirage5–130.0813%12 Aug →
cache13–50.0616%12 Aug →
mirage7–130.0321%12 Aug →
inferno13–70.0422%12 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.057%10 Aug →
inferno13–10.1330%10 Aug →
nuke13–100.0422%10 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0613%7 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0818%6 Aug →
inferno1–6-0.0144%6 Aug →
dust26–130.0229%5 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0826%4 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0426%2 Aug →
nuke13–110.0616%1 Aug →
mirage8–130.0213%1 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.129%31 Jul →
anubis4–13-0.125%31 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.