eidk

eidk — CS2 Stats

US76561197960439517[U:1:173789]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,261Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating7.5 StrongSupport
Premier CS Rating23,216Top 25% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#39752 of 252625 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,734 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 16 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+786Premier CS Rating · 22,430 → 23,216

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 23,216 -2,199 15 Aug – 17 Oct · 30 days played
20,54325,415peak 25,41515 Aug17 Oct
25,415Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,734Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,734
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 17 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,199 below peak (25,415)
  • +1,053 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 1,784 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGeidkFACEITLevel 7 · 1,734 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER23,216 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,734csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning68
Utility69

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–53–2Last 10045%Win rateWWLWLWWTLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −4.3pp headshot accuracy · +32ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 545ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 509ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.2 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility6.9
Positioning6.8
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch5.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 67% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 67% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning6.8
Utility6.9
Mechanics7.1
Opening Duels6.3
Win Impact7.9

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04+0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time523ms−35ms
first ⅓ avg 558ms → last ⅓ avg 523ms
Headshot accuracy24.9%+3.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.1% → last ⅓ avg 24.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.30Best match rating · 9–1 · nuke, 20 Aug →
41%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · ancient, 29 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 5–9 · vertigo, 7 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 25 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
6–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 64% over 14mirageWeakest map · 25% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
cacheB2513–1252%0.03
nukeA149–564%0.04
infernoD124–833%0.00
mirageD123–925%0.01
dust2A116–555%0.00
anubisC114–736%0.01
ancientC114–736%0.02
vertigo—31–233%0.05
debris—11–0100%0.11

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (25% over 12). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

270Matches
52%Win rate
1.14Avg K/D
82.9ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2143%1.0615.4
Nuke2030%1.1214.8
Ancient2045%1.1315.0
Dust21354%1.1316.9
Inferno1164%1.3215.9
Overpass1080%1.0714.6
Anubis1060%1.3018.1
Vertigo850%0.9714.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
31.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.9%Spray accuracy
82.0%Counter-strafing
8.8°Preaim
520msReaction time
67.3%T opening success
43.0%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
7.9%Flash assists
12.96HE damage / grenade
7.92Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

25% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–60.0914%17 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0220%17 Oct →
nuke7–130.0216%17 Oct →
cache13–20.1219%17 Oct →
inferno10–130.0818%16 Oct →
nuke13–60.0231%16 Oct →
inferno13–30.0931%16 Oct →
anubis15–150.0429%16 Oct →
cache8–130.0015%16 Oct →
inferno16–130.0131%15 Oct →
cache10–20.1223%15 Oct →
cache13–90.0535%15 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0533%14 Oct →
ancient8–130.0113%14 Oct →
nuke13–40.0829%12 Oct →
dust213–60.1027%12 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0425%12 Oct →
nuke8–130.0429%10 Oct →
ancient6–130.0331%10 Oct →
cache16–130.0521%9 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0029%9 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0518%8 Oct →
dust213–100.0222%8 Oct →
ancient13–60.1033%8 Oct →
nuke13–90.0528%8 Oct →
inferno13–110.0232%7 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0128%7 Oct →
cache13–60.0730%4 Oct →
cache13–80.0422%3 Oct →
inferno11–130.0133%3 Oct →
dust213–100.0113%3 Oct →
nuke13–70.0729%1 Oct →
cache4–130.0016%1 Oct →
ancient13–90.0622%1 Oct →
mirage7–130.0224%1 Oct →
nuke13–90.0624%1 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.028%1 Oct →
inferno0–2-0.020%1 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0535%1 Oct →
anubis13–110.0116%29 Sept →
nuke13–100.0533%29 Sept →
debris9–60.1132%28 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0114%25 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0513%25 Sept →
mirage7–130.0017%25 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0120%25 Sept →
ancient16–120.0715%25 Sept →
dust27–130.0319%25 Sept →
mirage13–10.0815%25 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0310%25 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0710%23 Sept →
cache13–60.1523%23 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0019%23 Sept →
mirage9–130.0227%23 Sept →
mirage14–16-0.0120%18 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0317%18 Sept →
mirage8–130.0219%17 Sept →
dust29–130.0322%17 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0522%17 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0125%16 Sept →
nuke13–110.0220%16 Sept →
anubis12–16-0.0119%14 Sept →
cache10–130.0119%14 Sept →
vertigo13–50.0026%9 Sept →
mirage8–130.0014%9 Sept →
anubis4–130.0226%9 Sept →
vertigo5–90.1130%7 Sept →
inferno5–9-0.1218%7 Sept →
nuke1–9-0.247%7 Sept →
mirage13–70.0416%5 Sept →
cache13–30.1222%5 Sept →
nuke16–130.0717%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0320%3 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0225%3 Sept →
ancient16–14-0.0018%3 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0522%3 Sept →
anubis3–130.0031%2 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0415%2 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0324%1 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0121%1 Sept →
anubis13–100.0426%30 Aug →
cache8–130.0418%30 Aug →
ancient2–130.0241%29 Aug →
cache13–60.0636%29 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0022%29 Aug →
anubis13–70.0218%28 Aug →
cache13–6-0.015%28 Aug →
cache13–40.0516%23 Aug →
cache6–130.0118%23 Aug →
anubis10–130.0123%20 Aug →
anubis15–150.0120%20 Aug →
inferno8–130.0724%20 Aug →
mirage10–130.0017%20 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0327%20 Aug →
vertigo5–90.0423%20 Aug →
nuke9–10.3030%20 Aug →
cache9–130.047%18 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0416%18 Aug →
ancient10–130.0222%18 Aug →
ancient10–130.0131%15 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.