Emms

Emms — CS2 Stats

DK76561198043309771[U:1:83044043]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

148Tracked matches41%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating3.8 LearningPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanGold Nova Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 148 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 33 days played since 23 May 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,689 +2,067 26 May7 Jul · 12 days played
8,99412,634peak 12,63426 May7 Jul
12,634Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2025-05-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGEmmsFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim44
Positioning38
Utility28

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD46522Last 10046%Win rateWLLLLLLWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · +5.2pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 617ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 6131 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.5 against its own average).

Aim4.4
Utility2.8
Positioning3.8
Opening Duels0.1
Clutch2.6

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 49% on CT to 12% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 608ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.4
Positioning3.8
Utility2.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.1

Composite 3.8/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time614ms−39ms
first ⅓ avg 653ms → last ⅓ avg 614ms
Headshot accuracy11.7%−1.5%
first ⅓ avg 13.2% → last ⅓ avg 11.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–10 · nuke, 30 Jun
27%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · nuke, 3 Jun
453msFastest reaction time · 7–13 · inferno, 26 May
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 3 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
47In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18mirageWeakest map · 33% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2181338%-0.01
anubisB21111052%0.01
infernoA1811761%0.01
mirageD124833%0.01
dust2C114736%-0.00
ancientC52340%0.02
overpass32167%-0.03
train31233%-0.04
brewery1010%-0.13
grail110100%0.02
cache110100%0.04
jura1010%-0.07
office1010%-0.05
vertigo110100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

10Matches
30%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
70.2ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
1Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke20%0.5610.0
Dust2250%1.2212.5
Mirage20%0.599.5
Cache1100%1.8613.0
Anubis1100%1.4619.0
Ancient10%0.8814.0
Inferno10%0.8821.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.3%Headshot accuracy
28.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.7%Spray accuracy
76.7%Counter-strafing
9.2°Preaim
608msReaction time
11.8%T opening success
49.3%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
2.7%Flash assists
8.24HE damage / grenade
3.28Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.3193% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4661 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 11.8006% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–6-0.0515%14 Jun
nuke8–13-0.0315%10 Jun
overpass8–13-0.034%10 Jun
dust25–13-0.0721%5 Jun
dust210–130.0114%3 Jun
nuke2–13-0.0927%3 Jun
inferno1–9-0.1815%3 Jun
inferno13–100.0917%2 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0913%1 Jun
anubis4–13-0.0410%1 Jun
mirage10–13-0.0116%30 May
dust213–4-0.038%29 May
inferno9–30.1211%29 May
anubis13–9-0.0412%28 May
anubis2–13-0.0612%27 May
inferno7–13-0.108%26 May
mirage5–13-0.075%26 May
anubis7–130.019%25 May
nuke13–110.027%25 May
anubis15–15-0.0711%25 May
inferno16–13-0.0118%24 May
nuke13–10-0.0910%24 May
overpass13–10-0.076%19 Jul
inferno13–70.017%7 Jul
train10–13-0.0114%7 Jul
ancient7–130.026%7 Jul
mirage2–13-0.0611%7 Jul
dust213–10.056%7 Jul
dust27–130.018%7 Jul
nuke10–130.009%7 Jul
mirage13–100.049%6 Jul
inferno13–110.0313%6 Jul
mirage13–70.0220%6 Jul
inferno9–130.0513%6 Jul
nuke13–50.0512%6 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0412%6 Jul
ancient5–130.0210%6 Jul
anubis13–50.1318%6 Jul
anubis13–7-0.036%6 Jul
anubis6–13-0.026%6 Jul
inferno13–80.0115%6 Jul
nuke3–90.0023%6 Jul
nuke13–5-0.003%6 Jul
brewery2–9-0.136%6 Jul
anubis13–40.0410%5 Jul
inferno8–130.0215%3 Jul
inferno11–130.0913%3 Jul
dust213–40.069%3 Jul
mirage13–80.0213%3 Jul
nuke1–13-0.0713%3 Jul
ancient13–00.0726%3 Jul
anubis6–13-0.0513%3 Jul
grail13–40.0212%2 Jul
nuke13–10.0416%2 Jul
nuke9–13-0.0512%1 Jul
nuke16–140.0012%1 Jul
anubis13–10-0.0216%1 Jul
nuke13–100.1420%30 Jun
inferno13–70.058%30 Jun
anubis13–100.037%30 Jun
dust27–13-0.0115%27 Jun
mirage0–13-0.0411%27 Jun
inferno13–4-0.0114%27 Jun
anubis9–130.0210%27 Jun
mirage6–13-0.0311%27 Jun
anubis13–50.0321%27 Jun
anubis4–13-0.026%27 Jun
mirage3–130.1416%20 Jun
anubis13–90.0110%20 Jun
ancient14–160.0412%20 Jun
inferno13–8-0.0114%20 Jun
nuke15–150.0818%20 Jun
mirage13–70.1011%20 Jun
anubis8–00.0110%20 Jun
anubis8–130.0017%20 Jun
nuke11–13-0.0212%18 Jun
anubis13–80.0527%16 Jun
dust211–13-0.0612%16 Jun
cache13–30.0416%15 Jun
jura7–13-0.079%6 Jun
nuke10–60.0219%5 Jun
dust213–20.0918%5 Jun
mirage7–130.0726%2 Jun
dust211–13-0.0310%2 Jun
office6–13-0.056%29 May
vertigo13–11-0.0112%29 May
overpass13–9-0.0111%29 May
nuke9–13-0.058%29 May
anubis13–40.1414%29 May
inferno9–130.059%29 May
anubis9–130.0210%29 May
inferno17–19-0.0217%27 May
ancient13–4-0.035%26 May
nuke13–7-0.0118%26 May
dust23–13-0.037%26 May
train13–4-0.0411%26 May
train8–13-0.0516%26 May
mirage10–13-0.0315%26 May
inferno13–20.0512%23 May
nuke14–16-0.039%23 May

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →