WilsQ — CS2 Stats

FI76561198040108757[U:1:79843029]Steam profile ↗

809Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since

1,581Hours in CS16Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.8 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating15,636Purple band · top ~25.9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#20357 of 34072 tracked

FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanDistinguished Master Guardian

Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=918), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 5 median	Level 6 median	vs Level 6
Headshot rate	37.5%	44.2%	44.9%	7.4% short
Shot accuracy	13.6%	11.2%	11.8%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.09	1.04	1.04	above
Match win rate	68.0%	45.3%	45.3%	above

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69

Positioning65

Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–54–1Last 10045%Win rateLLWLWWLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim6.9

Aggression7.9

Utility5.9

Positioning6.5

Opening Duels4.1

Clutch6.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like donk 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9

Positioning6.5

Utility5.9

Mechanics6.7

Opening Duels4.1

Win Impact1.7

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time577ms−38ms

first ⅓ avg 615ms → last ⅓ avg 577ms

Headshot accuracy15.4%+0.6%

first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 15.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.22Best rating — ancient 13–3

13–2Biggest win — anubis

6Longest win streak

L2Current streak

6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 21ancientWeakest map · 28% over 18

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
inferno	S	21	14–7	67%	0.04
nuke	B	19	9–10	47%	0.03
ancient	D	18	5–13	28%	0.04
anubis	C	17	7–10	41%	0.02
cache	B	13	7–6	54%	0.02
mirage	D	9	3–6	33%	-0.01
dust2	—	3	0–3	0%	-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (28% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

48,151Lifetime kills

1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 5 players

4,306Matches

68.0%Match win rate · Top 5% of Level 5 players

37.5%Headshot %

13.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players

7,055MVPs

872Hours (in match)

2,206Bombs planted

483Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4713,015

M4A4 / M4A1-S8,790

AWP6,683

P2000 / USP-S2,547

Desert Eagle2,163

Glock-181,712

MP91,318

P90994

Five-SeveN955

P250878

Lifetime map wins

3,633inferno

2,944dust2

1,801nuke

782train

484lake

310bank

257cbble

186safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

8Matches

62%Win rate

1.06Avg K/D

87.7ADR

35%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

50%1v1 clutch win

0%1v2 clutch win

3Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	3	33%	1.64	15.0
Anubis	1	100%	1.27	19.0
Ancient	1	100%	1.00	15.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy

39.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

41.7%Spray accuracy

80.2%Counter-strafing

12.8°Preaim

574msReaction time

32.3%T opening success

60.8%CT opening success

0.54Enemies flashed / flash

8.3%Flash assists

7.85HE damage / grenade

10.59Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Advanced Mechanics
Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.
Preaim 12.7768° — above the 12° mark we flag
Aim Training →

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

28% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
cache	5–13	-0.06	7%	29 Aug →
nuke	5–13	-0.01	4%	29 Aug →
inferno	16–13	0.02	11%	29 Aug →
inferno	7–13	0.07	19%	28 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.09	27%	28 Aug →
ancient	13–7	0.05	12%	28 Aug →
mirage	3–13	0.04	19%	28 Aug →
nuke	13–4	0.09	10%	28 Aug →
cache	7–13	0.02	14%	27 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.00	9%	27 Aug →
inferno	13–11	0.05	21%	25 Aug →
cache	13–5	-0.01	18%	25 Aug →
anubis	11–13	0.03	30%	18 Aug →
mirage	8–13	-0.02	19%	17 Aug →
ancient	3–13	0.00	12%	17 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.03	27%	17 Aug →
ancient	5–13	0.07	11%	17 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.12	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	10–13	0.01	18%	17 Aug →
anubis	8–13	0.01	17%	17 Aug →
inferno	13–6	0.14	23%	15 Aug →
ancient	10–13	0.04	12%	15 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.00	4%	14 Aug →
inferno	12–6	0.08	20%	14 Aug →
nuke	13–9	-0.03	16%	14 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.05	13%	13 Aug →
anubis	13–9	0.10	10%	13 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.02	12%	13 Aug →
cache	10–13	0.02	14%	13 Aug →
cache	1–13	-0.06	22%	12 Aug →
ancient	12–16	0.05	14%	12 Aug →
cache	6–13	0.01	14%	12 Aug →
inferno	6–13	-0.04	18%	11 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	21%	11 Aug →
ancient	13–3	0.22	12%	10 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	18%	10 Aug →
mirage	13–5	0.02	12%	10 Aug →
nuke	14–16	0.06	19%	10 Aug →
mirage	16–13	-0.01	13%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.07	20%	8 Aug →
ancient	6–13	-0.08	13%	6 Aug →
anubis	14–16	0.01	15%	6 Aug →
nuke	9–13	0.01	11%	6 Aug →
anubis	9–13	0.02	9%	5 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.01	17%	5 Aug →
inferno	4–13	-0.07	17%	3 Aug →
nuke	13–11	0.06	12%	3 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.04	8%	2 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.06	15%	2 Aug →
nuke	14–16	-0.02	15%	2 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.05	10%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.12	25%	2 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.00	22%	1 Aug →
anubis	6–13	-0.02	24%	1 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.06	21%	1 Aug →
cache	13–10	0.08	24%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–9	0.02	55%	29 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.02	24%	29 Jul →
ancient	6–13	0.00	17%	29 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	26%	28 Jul →
cache	10–13	0.02	12%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–11	0.01	21%	27 Jul →
ancient	10–13	0.06	12%	27 Jul →
anubis	1–13	0.00	33%	27 Jul →
nuke	7–13	0.10	26%	27 Jul →
anubis	3–13	0.03	22%	27 Jul →
inferno	13–5	0.02	8%	26 Jul →
anubis	13–11	-0.02	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	5–9	0.00	25%	26 Jul →
inferno	9–5	-0.00	3%	26 Jul →
inferno	5–9	0.01	16%	26 Jul →
nuke	8–8	-0.02	21%	26 Jul →
inferno	9–2	0.19	11%	26 Jul →
cache	13–10	0.03	24%	26 Jul →
cache	13–7	0.09	23%	26 Jul →
inferno	13–7	0.08	16%	26 Jul →
ancient	10–13	-0.02	19%	25 Jul →
nuke	13–11	0.07	21%	24 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.05	12%	24 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.01	13%	24 Jul →
anubis	13–4	0.05	19%	23 Jul →
inferno	13–8	0.09	19%	23 Jul →
nuke	16–12	0.03	14%	22 Jul →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	16%	22 Jul →
ancient	13–10	0.01	11%	22 Jul →
mirage	2–13	-0.05	15%	22 Jul →
inferno	5–13	0.04	18%	22 Jul →
anubis	3–13	-0.06	8%	22 Jul →
dust2	11–13	-0.03	7%	21 Jul →
mirage	11–13	-0.02	9%	21 Jul →
anubis	14–16	-0.02	15%	20 Jul →
nuke	11–13	-0.00	12%	20 Jul →
ancient	13–16	-0.00	19%	20 Jul →
anubis	13–2	0.03	12%	20 Jul →
cache	13–4	0.04	19%	19 Jul →
dust2	2–13	-0.02	21%	19 Jul →
inferno	13–10	0.03	12%	19 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.01	6%	18 Jul →
anubis	13–8	0.09	8%	18 Jul →
anubis	8–13	-0.01	2%	18 Jul →