nap^

nap^ — CS2 Stats

DK76561198039113564[U:1:78847836]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,606Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,166Hours in CS47Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating3.7 LearningSupport
Premier CS Rating19,894Top 50% of 210,832 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86588 of 257842 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,755 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 24 Oct 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,894 +2,250 30 Aug – 24 Oct · 26 days played
17,64420,643peak 20,64330 Aug24 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,755 +0 30 Aug – 21 Sept · 4 observations
1,7551,755peak 1,75530 Aug21 Sept
20,847Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,755Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
22Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,755
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 246 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 749 below peak (20,643)
  • +1,135 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 106 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate37.8%46.8%48.2%10.4% short
Shot accuracy9.7%13.0%13.2%3.5% short
Kill/death ratio0.931.061.070.14 short
Match win rate33.5%46.3%46.9%13.5% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGnap^FACEITLevel 8 · 1,755 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,894 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,755csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim28
Positioning50
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD54–43–3Last 10054%Win rateLLLWLLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −1.1pp headshot accuracy · +3ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 517ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 582ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim2.8
Utility5.9
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 59% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 592ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 60% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim2.8
Positioning5.0
Utility5.9
Mechanics2.2
Opening Duels3.0
Win Impact3.3

Composite 3.7/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time590ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 574ms → last ⅓ avg 590ms
Headshot accuracy14.0%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 14.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–2 · anubis, 18 Oct →
32%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · cache, 24 Oct →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · ancient, 4 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L3Current streak
11–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 69% over 13anubisWeakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoS2114–767%-0.01
mirageB179–853%-0.01
dust2C177–1041%-0.02
cacheA148–657%-0.01
ancientS139–469%-0.01
nukeA106–460%-0.02
anubisD81–713%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

155,908Lifetime kills
0.93K/D
7,472Matches
33.5%Match win rate
37.8%Headshot %
9.7%Shot accuracy
11,605MVPs
2,842Hours (in match)
5,988Bombs planted
1,335Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,073
AWP9,406
MAC-104,409
SG 5534,406
P2503,822

Lifetime map wins

16,558dust2
10,013inferno
7,580nuke
1,332train
1,001vertigo
629cbble
62lake
55aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

891Matches
51%Win rate
0.93Avg K/D
77.7ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
20%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient9356%0.9715.3
Inferno9148%1.0014.9
Nuke8754%1.1116.0
Mirage7445%0.9113.8
Dust25652%0.9915.7
Anubis5659%1.0115.6
Cache2650%1.0515.6
Train1233%0.9714.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.2%Headshot accuracy
28.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.8%Spray accuracy
60.1%Counter-strafing
12.3°Preaim
592msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
46.5%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
6.09HE damage / grenade
15.41Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.3153° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.2213% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–130.0332%24 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.0025%23 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0215%22 Oct →
mirage13–50.0417%22 Oct →
inferno8–13-0.018%22 Oct →
inferno6–13-0.083%22 Oct →
mirage13–16-0.0514%22 Oct →
inferno16–130.0211%21 Oct →
cache13–9-0.095%21 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.070%21 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0117%21 Oct →
inferno13–40.1019%21 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0218%21 Oct →
anubis14–16-0.0517%20 Oct →
nuke13–11-0.025%20 Oct →
cache16–14-0.0213%20 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.1311%20 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0016%20 Oct →
ancient13–70.0111%20 Oct →
dust215–150.0615%20 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.058%20 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0814%19 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0125%19 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0815%19 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0118%19 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0022%19 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0111%19 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0513%18 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0414%18 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0413%18 Oct →
inferno13–2-0.037%18 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0310%18 Oct →
anubis13–20.1518%18 Oct →
dust213–80.0213%16 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.0512%16 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0415%15 Oct →
cache13–70.0825%15 Oct →
ancient13–50.0311%15 Oct →
ancient13–10-0.0711%14 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.018%14 Oct →
mirage3–130.0017%14 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0114%14 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0217%14 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.049%13 Oct →
mirage13–110.019%13 Oct →
inferno13–30.0132%13 Oct →
mirage13–110.059%13 Oct →
anubis6–13-0.0512%13 Oct →
nuke13–6-0.029%13 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0319%13 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0215%13 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0611%13 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0522%12 Oct →
inferno13–10.0921%11 Oct →
anubis9–130.019%11 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.0211%10 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0811%8 Oct →
ancient13–40.0612%8 Oct →
cache13–10-0.017%8 Oct →
anubis9–130.0121%8 Oct →
inferno13–110.0319%4 Oct →
nuke13–50.0124%4 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0515%4 Oct →
ancient13–50.0119%4 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0315%4 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.047%4 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0420%4 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0612%4 Oct →
inferno16–140.0219%4 Oct →
cache13–60.0122%4 Oct →
mirage16–140.0616%3 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0127%3 Oct →
cache11–130.0116%3 Oct →
dust213–80.0122%3 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0521%3 Oct →
nuke15–150.0313%3 Oct →
cache13–60.0426%3 Oct →
inferno15–150.0316%3 Oct →
mirage13–50.0916%3 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0528%3 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0317%2 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.029%2 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0413%1 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.088%1 Oct →
inferno13–60.0220%1 Oct →
ancient14–16-0.0314%30 Sept →
inferno13–80.0115%30 Sept →
ancient13–40.0615%30 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0220%30 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.015%30 Sept →
cache3–130.0315%30 Sept →
ancient13–50.0311%29 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0618%29 Sept →
ancient13–6-0.0311%29 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0225%29 Sept →
nuke13–70.0313%27 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0314%27 Sept →
cache7–13-0.0326%27 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0223%27 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0111%27 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.