lucao

lucao — CS2 Stats

BR76561198035601644[U:1:75335916]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

849Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,793Hours in CS29Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating28,916Top 1% of 175,286 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~1.1% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#1197 of 221169 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,110 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 48 days played since 23 Jun 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 28,916 +576 23 Jun12 Sept · 21 days played
26,53629,265peak 29,26523 Jun12 Sept
29,265Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,110Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2026-06-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,110
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 390 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • 349 below peak (29,265)
  • +1,297 over 30 days · improving
  • +576 over 90 days
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 1,084 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches14
Win rate36%
K/D1.03
Headshot %53%

Measured 8 Sep 202617 Sep 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,569), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate41.1%48.3%51.0%9.8% short
Shot accuracy14.8%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.071.090.05 short
Match win rate43.8%46.9%48.4%4.7% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlucaoFACEITLevel 9 · 2,110 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER28,916 · Red bandPEAK ELO2,110csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim76
Positioning55
Utility68

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD53452Last 10053%Win rateLWWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.3pp headshot accuracy · +7ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 37 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 570ms

Last 20

  • 614 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 567ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim7.6
Utility6.8
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch3.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 52% on CT to 33% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.6
Positioning5.5
Utility6.8
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels3.2
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time539ms−79ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 539ms
Headshot accuracy25.3%−3.6%
first ⅓ avg 28.9% → last ⅓ avg 25.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 9 Aug
71%Best headshot accuracy · 3–3 · mirage, 29 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 13 Sept
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 24 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
1510In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 80% over 5nukeWeakest map · 46% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB30151550%0.00
ancientA1912763%0.02
anubisB178947%0.03
nukeB136746%0.02
mirageB84450%0.01
overpassA53260%-0.03
dust2S54180%0.01
cache31233%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (46% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

150,809Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
6,855Matches
43.8%Match win rate
41.1%Headshot %
14.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 9 players
15,180MVPs
3,306Hours (in match)
7,488Bombs planted
1,884Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4756,719
AWP20,989
UMP-453,871
Knife2,822
MAC-102,282

Lifetime map wins

10,065inferno
9,166dust2
2,479train
2,070nuke
1,629vertigo
604cbble
244office
209italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

548Matches
51%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
76.0ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage12743%1.0914.9
Inferno7761%1.3017.1
Dust27553%1.1415.5
Ancient5652%1.2116.6
Anubis4050%1.2414.9
Overpass3063%1.1815.2
Nuke2843%1.0615.5
Train1070%1.2919.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.2%Headshot accuracy
31.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.4%Spray accuracy
76.5%Counter-strafing
9.8°Preaim
549msReaction time
32.9%T opening success
52.4%CT opening success
0.62Enemies flashed / flash
9.1%Flash assists
8.62HE damage / grenade
12.68Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 32.9283% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

46% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno11–13-0.0316%16 Sept
inferno13–70.0534%16 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0027%14 Sept
overpass13–11-0.0119%13 Sept
anubis7–13-0.0321%13 Sept
inferno4–13-0.0547%13 Sept
nuke11–130.0020%12 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0523%12 Sept
ancient8–130.0213%12 Sept
inferno12–160.0433%11 Sept
inferno6–13-0.0418%7 Sept
ancient7–130.0032%7 Sept
overpass6–13-0.0626%7 Sept
inferno13–80.0227%7 Sept
inferno13–16-0.0140%6 Sept
overpass11–13-0.0530%6 Sept
anubis10–130.0225%6 Sept
ancient13–60.0920%6 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0111%6 Sept
inferno10–130.0420%5 Sept
inferno16–130.0412%5 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0242%4 Sept
dust213–110.0331%2 Sept
ancient9–130.0726%29 Aug
inferno16–14-0.0326%29 Aug
nuke13–80.0227%29 Aug
ancient13–110.0431%28 Aug
ancient13–40.0012%28 Aug
ancient9–130.0434%28 Aug
inferno13–10-0.0511%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0719%24 Aug
nuke13–00.0459%24 Aug
inferno4–130.000%24 Aug
anubis13–1-0.0219%24 Aug
nuke2–130.000%23 Aug
inferno13–50.0835%23 Aug
anubis13–70.1427%22 Aug
nuke13–80.0835%20 Aug
cache10–130.0117%18 Aug
cache11–130.0113%18 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0222%17 Aug
mirage13–100.0730%16 Aug
anubis13–80.0824%16 Aug
anubis5–13-0.0314%14 Aug
inferno1–13-0.0621%14 Aug
inferno11–130.0621%10 Aug
mirage19–16-0.0123%10 Aug
inferno13–90.0226%9 Aug
nuke13–00.1626%9 Aug
anubis13–40.0622%9 Aug
ancient7–130.0327%8 Aug
anubis14–16-0.0125%4 Aug
mirage13–100.0228%3 Aug
ancient16–140.1028%3 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0326%2 Aug
anubis11–130.0416%2 Aug
inferno10–130.0627%2 Aug
overpass16–12-0.0218%2 Aug
inferno13–80.0341%31 Jul
mirage8–130.0817%31 Jul
anubis9–130.0029%30 Jul
mirage13–10-0.0131%29 Jul
mirage3–3-0.0071%29 Jul
inferno9–130.0133%28 Jul
anubis5–13-0.0829%27 Jul
anubis16–120.0625%27 Jul
nuke8–130.0127%26 Jul
ancient8–13-0.0234%26 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0325%26 Jul
anubis13–50.1333%25 Jul
anubis1–30.0340%25 Jul
inferno4–13-0.0936%25 Jul
dust216–14-0.0120%25 Jul
mirage3–13-0.0224%20 Jul
ancient13–80.0031%19 Jul
inferno13–100.0121%16 Jul
nuke13–11-0.0033%16 Jul
dust213–11-0.0020%14 Jul
inferno13–110.0351%13 Jul
cache13–110.0026%13 Jul
dust211–130.0135%12 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0027%12 Jul
ancient13–110.0227%11 Jul
ancient16–14-0.0428%11 Jul
dust213–10.0026%11 Jul
mirage9–13-0.0214%11 Jul
nuke15–15-0.0013%11 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0115%11 Jul
ancient16–140.0520%10 Jul
nuke13–60.0254%10 Jul
inferno13–40.0828%10 Jul
anubis13–5-0.0320%6 Jul
nuke7–13-0.0034%4 Jul
anubis13–30.1336%4 Jul
ancient13–90.0348%3 Jul
ancient13–9-0.0115%2 Jul
inferno10–13-0.0433%28 Jun
overpass13–10-0.0134%28 Jun
ancient11–13-0.0137%26 Jun
inferno13–50.0213%23 Jun

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →