Im Skeisz

Im Skeisz — CS2 Stats

LV76561198035375213[U:1:75109485]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,771Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,635Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating16,423Purple band · top ~22.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Jun 2026 (103 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 26 days played since 19 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,423 -7,578 19 Feb6 Jun · 23 days played
16,42324,106peak 24,10619 Feb6 Jun
24,839Peak Premier in tracked matches
26Days played since 2026-02-19

Premier CS Rating

  • 7,683 below peak (24,106)
  • -3,130 over 30 days · declining
  • -4,618 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,577 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,738), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate49.3%46.8%48.3%above
Shot accuracy15.4%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.051.061.070.02 short
Match win rate43.0%46.3%46.9%3.9% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGIm SkeiszFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER16,423 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim59
Positioning48
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD41554Last 10041%Win rateWLWLLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.2pp headshot accuracy · −17ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Last 10

  • 28 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 557ms

Last 20

  • 7121 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim5.9
Utility7.0
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 75% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 20% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.9
Positioning4.8
Utility7.0
Mechanics5.7
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact1.4

Composite 5.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time563ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 563ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+3.3%
first ⅓ avg 15.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–3 · cache, 30 Apr
41%Best headshot accuracy · 6–13 · inferno, 7 Apr
266msFastest reaction time · 1–6 · dust2, 21 Feb
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 26 Mar

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
1113In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 50% over 16infernoWeakest map · 31% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2071335%-0.02
ancientB1991047%-0.01
anubisB168850%0.01
infernoD1651131%-0.02
dust2C146843%-0.02
overpassD62433%-0.01
cacheC52340%0.04
nuke42250%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (31% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

127,003Lifetime kills
1.05K/D
5,265Matches
43.0%Match win rate
49.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
10,845MVPs
2,635Hours (in match)
3,045Bombs planted
1,174Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,701
AWP7,571
FAMAS3,272
P2502,601
MP92,416

Lifetime map wins

8,368inferno
5,900dust2
3,149train
2,685nuke
1,129vertigo
629cbble
119office
108dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

567Matches
54%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
76.7ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3247%0.9612.5
Anubis2756%1.0015.8
Ancient2259%0.9914.8
Vertigo862%1.0515.4
Dust2714%0.6110.6
Nuke729%0.7413.3
Inferno667%1.2316.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.7%Headshot accuracy
31.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.7%Spray accuracy
75.5%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
566msReaction time
20.3%T opening success
45.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
11.31HE damage / grenade
14.96Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 20.2892% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

31% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategyInferno grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–11-0.0012%6 Jun
anubis7–13-0.0428%6 Jun
ancient13–80.1213%6 Jun
overpass6–13-0.084%6 Jun
anubis11–130.038%6 Jun
dust211–13-0.0131%15 May
inferno13–16-0.0515%15 May
ancient3–13-0.0713%15 May
mirage10–13-0.0218%15 May
ancient3–13-0.0526%15 May
anubis15–15-0.0117%1 May
mirage13–90.018%1 May
ancient16–14-0.0418%1 May
nuke6–13-0.0816%1 May
anubis13–100.0524%1 May
overpass13–110.0214%1 May
ancient4–13-0.0815%1 May
cache11–130.0120%1 May
cache11–130.0221%1 May
overpass16–140.0013%30 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0518%30 Apr
cache8–130.0338%30 Apr
cache13–30.1630%30 Apr
anubis15–15-0.0420%26 Apr
inferno9–13-0.0314%26 Apr
mirage11–13-0.0114%26 Apr
mirage5–13-0.0710%18 Apr
mirage13–70.0132%17 Apr
mirage13–11-0.0113%16 Apr
anubis13–7-0.0213%16 Apr
ancient13–80.0418%16 Apr
anubis11–13-0.0223%7 Apr
inferno6–13-0.0241%7 Apr
ancient13–70.049%29 Mar
anubis12–12-0.0119%28 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0429%28 Mar
nuke13–8-0.0233%28 Mar
inferno13–100.0233%28 Mar
anubis13–40.1231%26 Mar
dust25–13-0.0729%26 Mar
nuke9–13-0.0424%26 Mar
ancient13–20.0520%26 Mar
overpass13–160.0417%21 Mar
inferno7–13-0.0318%21 Mar
ancient13–70.0220%21 Mar
dust213–20.0628%21 Mar
inferno13–6-0.0316%21 Mar
overpass13–16-0.0313%21 Mar
mirage2–13-0.0911%21 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0813%19 Mar
dust25–13-0.0022%19 Mar
anubis16–140.0416%13 Mar
mirage8–13-0.0619%13 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0118%13 Mar
inferno16–14-0.0115%12 Mar
mirage13–7-0.0113%12 Mar
anubis11–130.0218%12 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0319%12 Mar
ancient13–110.0116%7 Mar
mirage15–15-0.0223%7 Mar
ancient1–13-0.0124%7 Mar
inferno11–13-0.0222%6 Mar
dust28–13-0.0323%6 Mar
mirage13–6-0.0416%5 Mar
anubis16–130.0312%1 Mar
dust213–3-0.015%1 Mar
inferno5–13-0.0614%1 Mar
ancient13–6-0.0718%1 Mar
dust25–13-0.0314%27 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0317%27 Feb
mirage13–160.0515%27 Feb
overpass7–130.0013%27 Feb
anubis13–90.0217%27 Feb
nuke13–80.0724%26 Feb
inferno2–13-0.0621%26 Feb
dust26–130.0119%26 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0227%22 Feb
ancient13–40.0321%22 Feb
mirage6–130.0221%22 Feb
inferno11–130.0618%22 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0611%22 Feb
anubis11–13-0.0117%22 Feb
inferno13–80.0228%22 Feb
dust213–110.0020%22 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0218%22 Feb
mirage13–7-0.0014%21 Feb
ancient5–13-0.086%21 Feb
inferno13–60.0220%21 Feb
ancient10–13-0.0714%21 Feb
dust21–6-0.110%21 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0212%21 Feb
ancient10–130.0119%21 Feb
dust213–4-0.0710%21 Feb
dust213–11-0.0115%21 Feb
anubis13–30.066%20 Feb
ancient7–13-0.0013%20 Feb
dust213–100.009%20 Feb
anubis16–14-0.038%20 Feb
mirage9–13-0.016%20 Feb
dust20–13-0.0319%19 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →