MamieTisane

MamieTisane — CS2 Stats

FR76561198032968710[U:1:72702982]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,932Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
6,310Hours in CS32Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.5 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,000Top 25% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#20445 of 242418 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,425 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 13 Sep 2026 (11 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 29 days played since 2 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,000 +3,150 2 Aug – 13 Sept · 26 days played
21,85025,105peak 25,1052 Aug13 Sept
25,105Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,425Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
29Days played since 2026-08-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,425
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 106 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 105 below peak (25,105)
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 5,000 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches93——
Win rate49%——
K/D1.11——
Headshot %54%——

Measured 30 Aug 2026 → 24 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,804), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate45.2%48.3%51.0%5.7% short
Shot accuracy11.0%13.2%13.7%2.7% short
Kill/death ratio1.021.071.090.07 short
Match win rate47.1%46.9%48.4%1.3% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMamieTisaneFACEITLevel 9 · 1,425 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER25,000 · Red bandPEAK ELO1,425csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning56
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–44–4Last 10052%Win rateTWLLWWWLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −32ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 20

  • 11–8–1 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 510ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility6.0
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.2

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 85 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.6
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.5/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time547ms−67ms
first ⅓ avg 614ms → last ⅓ avg 547ms
Headshot accuracy24.1%+0.7%
first ⅓ avg 23.4% → last ⅓ avg 24.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–1 · cache, 8 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 8–0 · dust2, 9 Sept →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · dust2, 13 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 8 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
7–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 71% over 17dust2Weakest map · 40% over 43
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C4317–2640%0.00
nukeB1910–953%0.01
infernoS1712–571%0.01
cacheA106–460%0.04
anubisA53–260%-0.01
ancient—22–0100%-0.02
mirage—21–150%0.06
boulder—10–10%0.07
shelter—11–0100%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 43). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

160,476Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
8,374Matches
47.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players
45.2%Headshot %
11.0%Shot accuracy
21,931MVPs
4,390Hours (in match)
12,484Bombs planted
2,352Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4758,254
AWP19,277
MAC-103,166
UMP-453,077
P2502,507
Knife2,083

Lifetime map wins

44,179dust2
11,111inferno
6,521nuke
1,263cbble
752train
564lake
296vertigo
285safehouse

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,826Matches
51%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
72.0ADR
51%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust254251%0.9814.6
Inferno25055%0.9313.6
Nuke19653%1.0115.3
Anubis17848%0.9815.2
Ancient7649%0.8914.1
Overpass7446%0.9414.3
Cache5655%1.0616.5
Mirage4931%0.8214.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.5%Headshot accuracy
34.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.5%Spray accuracy
80.0%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
536msReaction time
29.7%T opening success
42.3%CT opening success
0.64Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
9.35HE damage / grenade
10.79Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 29.6596% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 43 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
boulder12–120.0713%14 Sept →
shelter13–11-0.0036%13 Sept →
cache9–130.0924%13 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0624%13 Sept →
dust213–70.0212%13 Sept →
nuke13–100.0430%13 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0040%13 Sept →
dust29–130.009%13 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0426%11 Sept →
nuke13–40.0221%11 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0220%11 Sept →
dust213–4-0.0119%10 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0322%10 Sept →
dust213–7-0.0011%9 Sept →
nuke13–4-0.0222%9 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0214%9 Sept →
dust28–0-0.0467%9 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0219%8 Sept →
cache13–10.1236%8 Sept →
dust28–130.0529%8 Sept →
inferno9–70.0331%8 Sept →
dust29–130.0126%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0225%4 Sept →
inferno13–100.0519%4 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0524%4 Sept →
dust211–130.0019%3 Sept →
dust28–130.1122%3 Sept →
mirage15–150.1026%3 Sept →
dust26–130.0018%3 Sept →
nuke16–120.0431%2 Sept →
inferno13–100.0226%2 Sept →
anubis13–100.0614%2 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0219%2 Sept →
inferno12–160.0017%2 Sept →
cache11–130.0722%2 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0418%2 Sept →
nuke11–130.0213%1 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0429%1 Sept →
dust23–130.0037%1 Sept →
inferno13–100.0029%31 Aug →
anubis13–11-0.0130%31 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0914%31 Aug →
dust213–110.0522%28 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0620%27 Aug →
cache13–40.0227%25 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0630%23 Aug →
dust212–00.0820%23 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0415%23 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0118%23 Aug →
cache13–90.0733%23 Aug →
inferno5–1-0.070%23 Aug →
nuke15–150.0825%23 Aug →
dust26–13-0.069%23 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0618%20 Aug →
dust213–40.0327%20 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0435%19 Aug →
dust28–130.0521%18 Aug →
dust24–4-0.0338%18 Aug →
dust29–130.0422%18 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0637%16 Aug →
inferno11–130.0219%15 Aug →
cache13–9-0.0424%14 Aug →
nuke4–11-0.0518%14 Aug →
dust213–20.0426%13 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0224%13 Aug →
nuke13–20.0520%13 Aug →
dust29–130.0529%12 Aug →
dust213–8-0.049%12 Aug →
mirage13–90.0228%12 Aug →
dust213–40.0120%12 Aug →
inferno13–10.1121%11 Aug →
dust213–90.0715%9 Aug →
nuke13–90.0118%9 Aug →
inferno13–90.0315%9 Aug →
cache10–130.0522%8 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0249%8 Aug →
nuke13–50.0520%8 Aug →
nuke13–80.0420%8 Aug →
dust29–130.0129%8 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0037%8 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0530%8 Aug →
dust213–60.0134%8 Aug →
nuke13–00.000%8 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0232%8 Aug →
ancient13–70.0020%8 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0635%3 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0313%3 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0116%3 Aug →
inferno13–7-0.0021%3 Aug →
nuke13–90.0220%3 Aug →
inferno16–120.0220%3 Aug →
inferno13–10.0830%3 Aug →
dust213–20.0632%3 Aug →
dust213–30.0519%3 Aug →
anubis5–13-0.0417%3 Aug →
nuke11–130.1029%2 Aug →
inferno12–40.0220%2 Aug →
cache16–140.0318%2 Aug →
dust213–100.0024%2 Aug →
cache13–10.0442%2 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →