Mogg

Mogg — CS2 Stats

76561198233391572[U:1:273125844]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,217Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,283Hours in CS21Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.9 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating21,134Top 50% of 194,975 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~7.3% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#63815 of 242571 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,772 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 18 Sep 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 66 days played since 20 Apr 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,134 -5,220 20 Apr – 18 Sept · 26 days played
20,22326,569peak 26,56920 Apr18 Sept
26,636Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,772Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
66Days played since 2026-04-20

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,772
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 229 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-09
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-09

Premier CS Rating

  • 5,435 below peak (26,569)
  • +911 over 30 days · improving
  • -4,779 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 3,866 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-09
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-09

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,086), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.8%46.8%48.3%1.5% short
Shot accuracy10.9%13.0%13.2%2.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.921.061.070.15 short
Match win rate44.8%46.3%46.9%2.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMoggFACEITLevel 8 · 1,772 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER21,134 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,772csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim46
Positioning52
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD42–56–2Last 10042%Win rateLLLWLLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +5.2pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 646ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 653ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 21%
  • Avg reaction 650ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.7 against its own average).

Aim4.6
Utility7.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels3.3
Clutch3.6

High utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 63% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 47% on CT to 32% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 659ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.6
Positioning5.2
Utility7.6
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels2.4
Win Impact2.8

Composite 4.9/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time659ms+27ms
first ⅓ avg 632ms → last ⅓ avg 659ms
Headshot accuracy22.6%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 22.6% → last ⅓ avg 22.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–3 · nuke, 21 Aug →
44%Best headshot accuracy · 13–10 · mirage, 30 Apr →
453msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · inferno, 3 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 21 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
10–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 63% over 8dust2Weakest map · 35% over 37
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3713–2435%-0.02
infernoC2712–1544%-0.03
nukeC156–940%-0.02
cacheA85–363%-0.00
mirage—42–250%-0.02
overpass—41–325%-0.02
ancient—31–233%-0.01
anubis—22–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (35% over 37). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

111,645Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
6,225Matches
44.8%Match win rate
46.8%Headshot %
10.9%Shot accuracy
11,334MVPs
2,863Hours (in match)
8,593Bombs planted
1,349Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,634
AWP8,351
MP74,375
FAMAS3,952
MAC-102,546

Lifetime map wins

18,724dust2
16,048inferno
6,595nuke
1,626train
554vertigo
130assault
121lake
106cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,006Matches
50%Win rate
0.92Avg K/D
71.4ADR
49%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
17%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust258351%0.9313.4
Inferno31058%0.9513.8
Nuke23047%0.8713.5
Anubis19048%0.8813.2
Mirage8535%0.8113.6
Ancient8042%0.8814.2
Overpass6743%0.8512.8
Cache5555%0.8013.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.5%Headshot accuracy
28.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
30.2%Spray accuracy
72.7%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
659msReaction time
31.9%T opening success
47.3%CT opening success
0.69Enemies flashed / flash
15.7%Flash assists
14.85HE damage / grenade
8.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.8664% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

35% win rate across 37 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke11–130.0629%18 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0438%11 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0232%9 Sept →
dust28–00.0613%9 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0115%8 Sept →
dust29–130.0425%5 Sept →
dust28–13-0.0713%4 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0710%4 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0318%3 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0442%2 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0421%2 Sept →
inferno13–100.0013%31 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.0112%31 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0413%30 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0522%27 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0220%23 Aug →
dust213–1-0.0213%21 Aug →
nuke13–30.1022%21 Aug →
dust210–13-0.0120%19 Aug →
dust24–4-0.0425%18 Aug →
dust29–13-0.0416%18 Aug →
cache13–90.0128%14 Aug →
nuke4–11-0.0636%14 Aug →
inferno13–10.0223%11 Aug →
nuke13–90.0115%9 Aug →
inferno13–9-0.0331%9 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0535%8 Aug →
inferno13–1-0.0026%3 Aug →
dust213–20.0927%3 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0422%2 Aug →
inferno12–40.0331%2 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0119%2 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.1021%31 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0420%30 Jul →
cache4–13-0.0221%18 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.036%17 Jul →
dust213–80.0225%17 Jul →
inferno13–80.0428%14 Jul →
cache3–13-0.0314%14 Jul →
dust210–13-0.0324%14 Jul →
nuke8–13-0.0418%12 Jul →
dust213–11-0.0125%12 Jul →
dust27–130.0715%8 Jul →
dust213–9-0.0710%3 Jul →
dust22–13-0.0821%26 Jun →
inferno7–13-0.0329%24 Jun →
inferno16–14-0.0415%21 Jun →
mirage9–130.0221%20 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0316%16 Jun →
inferno4–9-0.1317%16 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.058%15 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0319%13 Jun →
inferno13–110.0328%13 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0428%8 Jun →
dust213–90.0121%8 Jun →
dust29–13-0.0723%6 Jun →
dust213–110.0319%6 Jun →
anubis13–8-0.0115%5 Jun →
dust216–130.0325%5 Jun →
dust215–150.0321%4 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0422%4 Jun →
cache13–90.0314%31 May →
inferno13–90.0117%31 May →
dust213–9-0.0529%29 May →
inferno13–11-0.0517%29 May →
nuke13–50.0618%27 May →
inferno7–13-0.0217%26 May →
ancient9–13-0.0529%26 May →
dust210–13-0.0724%26 May →
overpass7–13-0.0417%25 May →
dust28–13-0.0719%23 May →
nuke7–13-0.0634%22 May →
nuke6–13-0.0716%20 May →
overpass11–13-0.0218%18 May →
dust29–130.0217%18 May →
dust210–13-0.0430%16 May →
inferno9–13-0.0542%15 May →
dust210–130.0120%15 May →
dust213–5-0.0121%14 May →
inferno6–13-0.0626%14 May →
nuke13–8-0.0425%14 May →
mirage13–10-0.0515%10 May →
dust216–140.0123%10 May →
inferno3–9-0.186%9 May →
inferno8–8-0.0332%8 May →
dust27–13-0.0415%7 May →
inferno7–130.0213%6 May →
ancient5–130.0725%5 May →
cache13–50.0523%30 Apr →
mirage13–10-0.0144%30 Apr →
nuke4–13-0.0714%29 Apr →
dust216–14-0.0130%27 Apr →
inferno3–130.0124%27 Apr →
inferno6–13-0.0426%26 Apr →
dust211–13-0.0418%26 Apr →
overpass13–100.0418%25 Apr →
cache22–200.0117%23 Apr →
overpass7–13-0.0510%21 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0227%20 Apr →
inferno6–130.0030%20 Apr →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →