diddy's deciple 30hz

diddy's deciple 30hz — CS2 Stats

76561198028773286[U:1:68507558]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

86Tracked matches48%Win rate2024Tracked since
373Hours in CS1Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
WingmanGold Nova II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning41
Utility31

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–38–9Last 8645%Win rateLLLWLLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −2.1pp headshot accuracy · +29ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 8%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 9–9–2 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 573ms

Newest first, from the last 86 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility3.1
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.1

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 89% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 562ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.1
Utility3.1
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels1.1
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time560ms−121ms
first ⅓ avg 680ms → last ⅓ avg 560ms
Headshot accuracy9.7%−3.2%
first ⅓ avg 12.9% → last ⅓ avg 9.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 86 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 9–4 · inferno, 6 Oct →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 7–9 · inferno, 29 Dec →
422msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · mirage, 24 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 13 Oct →

Across the last 86 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
L3Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 6infernoWeakest map · 15% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB6130–3149%0.00
infernoD132–1115%-0.00
nukeS64–267%0.03
vertigo—41–325%-0.03
anubis—11–0100%0.04
overpass—11–0100%0.05

Across the last 86 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (15% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

19,844Lifetime kills
1.25K/D · Top 25% of tracked players
845Matches
29.9%Match win rate
36.0%Headshot %
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
1,891MVPs
250Hours (in match)
482Bombs planted
135Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

573inferno
360lake
266vertigo
229dust2
215nuke
42bank
15stmarc
13sugarcane

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.3%Headshot accuracy
30.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.9%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.0°Preaim
562msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
38.4%CT opening success
0.35Enemies flashed / flash
1.8%Flash assists
14.31HE damage / grenade
3.89Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.2958% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3538 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.1897% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

15% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage6–13-0.109%24 Oct →
mirage6–130.108%22 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0521%22 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.055%19 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.028%19 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.020%19 Oct →
mirage13–100.0411%17 Oct →
mirage13–60.014%17 Oct →
inferno4–9-0.103%17 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.018%15 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.085%14 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.095%14 Oct →
mirage13–10.099%13 Oct →
mirage13–90.099%13 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.029%13 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0421%11 Oct →
mirage13–70.007%10 Oct →
inferno9–40.1817%6 Oct →
mirage12–12-0.0711%5 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.036%5 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0512%4 Oct →
mirage3–13-0.038%4 Oct →
mirage12–120.0311%2 Oct →
inferno8–80.0810%2 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0311%1 Oct →
inferno8–80.0018%30 Sept →
nuke9–70.1521%30 Sept →
mirage4–13-0.028%27 Sept →
mirage3–130.0617%27 Sept →
mirage11–40.005%27 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.007%24 Sept →
mirage13–30.0116%24 Sept →
mirage13–40.065%24 Sept →
mirage13–40.0412%24 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0914%24 Sept →
inferno8–8-0.032%23 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0511%23 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.0310%23 Sept →
mirage13–20.0614%22 Sept →
inferno6–9-0.0314%21 Sept →
mirage13–70.039%21 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0412%18 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0417%18 Sept →
anubis13–30.0412%18 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.008%18 Sept →
mirage13–110.005%18 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0319%18 Sept →
mirage13–110.062%17 Sept →
inferno9–20.098%17 Sept →
mirage4–130.0815%17 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.037%17 Sept →
mirage12–12-0.0216%17 Sept →
mirage10–130.0210%15 Sept →
mirage13–70.0220%15 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.013%15 Sept →
mirage8–130.0413%14 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.076%14 Sept →
mirage2–13-0.0124%14 Sept →
mirage13–90.048%14 Sept →
mirage10–30.027%14 Sept →
nuke9–30.1821%13 Sept →
mirage13–10.0514%13 Sept →
mirage13–80.0411%13 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0611%13 Sept →
mirage0–9-0.090%13 Sept →
nuke0–9-0.250%10 Sept →
vertigo7–9-0.108%9 Sept →
mirage13–30.1515%9 Sept →
mirage13–40.068%9 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.059%9 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0215%30 Aug →
mirage7–130.036%27 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.028%23 Aug →
mirage7–130.0223%19 Aug →
mirage12–12-0.067%15 Aug →
inferno8–8-0.045%26 Apr →
nuke4–90.0527%17 Apr →
inferno5–9-0.0423%29 Dec →
inferno7–90.0233%29 Dec →
inferno7–9-0.048%28 Dec →
mirage13–5-0.0111%23 Dec →
nuke9–20.1318%22 Dec →
mirage0–5-0.0425%13 Dec →
overpass9–60.0518%11 Dec →
vertigo5–9-0.1214%29 Sept →
vertigo9–20.1410%29 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.