Berg

Berg — CS2 Stats

NO76561198025960332[U:1:65694604]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

578Tracked matches48%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,901Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating14,836Blue band · top ~29.3% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2Top 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 11 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,836 +971 1 Feb – 11 Oct · 26 days played
13,63717,070peak 17,0701 Feb11 Oct
17,070Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2026-01-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,234 below peak (17,070)
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 164 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=5,923), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate38.5%41.3%41.8%3.3% short
Shot accuracy12.3%12.7%12.2%meets
Kill/death ratio0.790.950.980.19 short
Match win rate39.0%42.6%43.3%4.3% short

This profile matches the typical Level 3 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 3 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBergFACEITLevel 2STANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER14,836 · Blue bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning44
Utility67

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT46–47–7Last 10046%Win rateWWWWWWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.2pp headshot accuracy · +8ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 578ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 602ms

Last 20

  • 12–5–3 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim3.4
Utility6.7
Positioning4.4
Opening Duels2.0

Effective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 62% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.83 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 67% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning4.4
Utility6.7
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels2.6
Win Impact4.4

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time613ms−49ms
first ⅓ avg 662ms → last ⅓ avg 613ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 16.7% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 7–1 · nuke, 30 Sept →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 13–3 · mirage, 22 Feb →
391msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · inferno, 16 Mar →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
W7Current streak
8–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
13Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 73% over 15infernoWeakest map · 32% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoD227–1532%-0.03
mirageD227–1532%-0.04
nukeC188–1044%-0.03
anubisS1511–473%-0.02
ancientA127–558%-0.04
cacheS64–267%-0.02
overpass—31–233%0.02
dust2—21–150%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

40,683Lifetime kills
0.79K/D
2,538Matches
39.0%Match win rate
38.5%Headshot %
12.3%Shot accuracy
3,896MVPs
1,125Hours (in match)
2,683Bombs planted
457Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

5,837inferno
3,349dust2
3,199nuke
665vertigo
554office
376cbble
182train
60italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
28.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
29.4%Spray accuracy
66.9%Counter-strafing
11.5°Preaim
612msReaction time
36.5%T opening success
44.0%CT opening success
0.83Enemies flashed / flash
7.0%Flash assists
9.12HE damage / grenade
7.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.5234% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–7-0.0116%11 Oct →
inferno13–70.0413%11 Oct →
cache6–2-0.0421%11 Oct →
cache13–110.0013%10 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0413%10 Oct →
anubis13–80.0418%10 Oct →
mirage13–20.0318%9 Oct →
inferno8–130.0629%9 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0412%5 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.036%5 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0313%30 Sept →
nuke7–10.1213%30 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0214%13 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0724%13 Sept →
mirage13–50.0626%12 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.078%8 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0414%8 Sept →
mirage8–13-0.0623%8 Sept →
cache15–15-0.0016%19 Aug →
cache13–70.0221%18 Aug →
mirage12–16-0.0313%18 Aug →
nuke5–13-0.109%16 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.0723%16 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0719%16 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0613%21 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0814%21 Jul →
mirage10–13-0.0518%21 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0124%16 Jul →
overpass13–16-0.0218%4 Jul →
nuke7–13-0.0714%4 Jul →
overpass11–130.0413%3 Jul →
nuke13–9-0.0318%7 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0824%4 Jun →
ancient7–13-0.0311%4 Jun →
anubis13–60.0516%4 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0421%3 Jun →
nuke13–50.0226%2 Jun →
inferno11–130.0716%1 Jun →
mirage13–100.0225%31 May →
inferno3–6-0.0719%31 May →
anubis7–13-0.0615%31 May →
nuke7–13-0.0312%31 May →
inferno6–13-0.0622%18 May →
cache12–12-0.046%18 May →
mirage7–13-0.039%10 May →
anubis7–2-0.0217%10 May →
ancient16–14-0.0114%1 May →
nuke13–4-0.0120%1 May →
anubis13–11-0.068%19 Apr →
mirage13–9-0.0620%22 Mar →
nuke13–60.0113%22 Mar →
dust213–9-0.0520%16 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.054%16 Mar →
ancient9–13-0.055%8 Mar →
mirage4–13-0.084%8 Mar →
anubis13–3-0.0610%8 Mar →
nuke13–16-0.0927%2 Mar →
ancient13–6-0.068%2 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0817%2 Mar →
inferno13–80.010%1 Mar →
inferno15–15-0.0215%25 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0522%25 Feb →
ancient10–13-0.0215%25 Feb →
inferno15–15-0.0011%22 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.0618%22 Feb →
inferno13–8-0.0118%22 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0513%22 Feb →
mirage13–3-0.0336%22 Feb →
inferno13–6-0.0118%21 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0611%21 Feb →
ancient16–140.029%21 Feb →
ancient5–13-0.0524%7 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0216%7 Feb →
overpass13–70.0417%6 Feb →
anubis13–70.0016%6 Feb →
inferno13–5-0.067%4 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0315%4 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0119%3 Feb →
nuke13–3-0.098%3 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.1030%2 Feb →
anubis13–6-0.0713%2 Feb →
mirage4–13-0.0313%1 Feb →
nuke4–13-0.0817%1 Feb →
anubis13–8-0.0214%1 Feb →
nuke7–13-0.0517%1 Feb →
inferno13–11-0.0414%1 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0522%31 Jan →
ancient13–11-0.057%31 Jan →
anubis11–130.028%31 Jan →
inferno15–15-0.064%28 Jan →
ancient6–13-0.0313%27 Jan →
mirage13–4-0.0117%25 Jan →
nuke8–13-0.0426%25 Jan →
ancient13–8-0.0329%25 Jan →
nuke13–80.0424%25 Jan →
mirage8–13-0.1019%25 Jan →
anubis13–100.0418%25 Jan →
mirage7–13-0.0626%24 Jan →
nuke16–14-0.0714%24 Jan →
anubis13–10-0.0412%24 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.