TylerCott

TylerCott — CS2 Stats

GB76561198025613551[U:1:65347823]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

346Tracked matches30%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,267Hours in CS3Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.0 DevelopingClutch Specialist
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Sep 2026 (41 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+7Tracked matches · now 346
−3.3ppWin rate · 33.3% → 30.0%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,526 +6,980 13 Nov – 25 Jul · 10 days played
9,54619,087peak 19,08713 Nov25 Jul
19,087Peak Premier in tracked matches
44Days played since 2023-08-13

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning40
Utility40

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–51–4Last 10045%Win rateWLWLLWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · +3.1pp headshot accuracy · −39ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 500ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 532ms

Last 20

  • 6–14 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Clutch Specialist — Late-round 1vX conversion stands above the rest of this profile (+5.4 against its own average).

Aim5.2
Utility4.0
Positioning4.0
Opening Duels0.3
Clutch10.0

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependenceReliable in 1v1s

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 42% on CT to 22% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 578ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning4.0
Utility4.0
Mechanics5.8
Opening Duels1.5
Win Impact0.0

Composite 4.0/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time581ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 624ms → last ⅓ avg 581ms
Headshot accuracy17.8%+5.1%
first ⅓ avg 12.7% → last ⅓ avg 17.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 16–3 · mirage, 20 Aug →
60%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · mirage, 21 Feb →
297msFastest reaction time · 4–0 · mirage, 21 Feb →
16–1Biggest win · inferno, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
35Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 60% over 5nukeWeakest map · 0% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3214–1844%-0.02
infernoB2412–1250%-0.02
overpassC188–1044%-0.01
cacheA74–357%-0.01
nukeD70–70%-0.02
anubisA53–260%-0.02
ancient—33–0100%-0.02
vertigo—30–30%-0.04
dust2—11–0100%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (0% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

28,963Lifetime kills
0.86K/D
1,641Matches
44.1%Match win rate
39.7%Headshot %
14.9%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of tracked players
2,929MVPs
791Hours (in match)
1,738Bombs planted
435Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

4,315inferno
1,277dust2
815nuke
560vertigo
527train
29safehouse
26cbble
21italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

148Matches
51%Win rate
0.81Avg K/D
55.2ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

100%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno367%0.497.3
Anubis1100%1.0010.0
Cache1100%1.2714.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
29.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
33.2%Spray accuracy
76.0%Counter-strafing
11.0°Preaim
578msReaction time
21.5%T opening success
41.6%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
1.6%Flash assists
8.68HE damage / grenade
4.19Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 21.5348% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

0% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–40.0129%13 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0910%12 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0310%29 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.037%29 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.076%19 Aug →
cache13–30.029%19 Aug →
cache13–16-0.028%19 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0744%11 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0847%18 Jul →
inferno13–2-0.0119%18 Jul →
mirage11–13-0.0223%18 Jul →
mirage8–130.0117%18 Jul →
overpass4–13-0.0612%21 Jun →
mirage10–130.0514%21 Jun →
overpass9–130.0110%21 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0218%7 Jun →
inferno13–40.0020%21 May →
mirage13–10.0521%21 May →
overpass10–13-0.0113%13 May →
cache9–13-0.0313%13 May →
inferno14–16-0.0515%2 May →
mirage13–1-0.045%2 May →
ancient13–10-0.0613%21 Apr →
inferno10–13-0.0611%4 Dec →
inferno9–13-0.0427%4 Dec →
ancient13–100.0212%20 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0628%20 Nov →
inferno12–16-0.0513%20 Nov →
overpass6–13-0.0425%14 Jun →
mirage14–16-0.0320%14 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0119%25 Jul →
mirage13–30.0434%25 Jul →
inferno13–90.0117%23 Jul →
nuke11–130.0118%23 Jul →
overpass10–13-0.0012%21 Feb →
inferno13–50.0227%21 Feb →
mirage4–00.0560%21 Feb →
mirage13–9-0.0512%23 Jan →
anubis13–6-0.0323%23 Jan →
inferno16–140.0715%26 Dec →
mirage11–13-0.0721%26 Dec →
overpass13–10-0.018%26 Dec →
mirage13–80.0116%28 Nov →
overpass13–7-0.0418%23 Nov →
mirage16–14-0.0215%23 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0519%21 Nov →
mirage10–13-0.0619%21 Nov →
inferno13–100.0432%15 Nov →
overpass5–130.038%14 Nov →
inferno13–9-0.0710%14 Nov →
overpass13–100.0114%13 Nov →
inferno5–13-0.0112%13 Nov →
mirage16–130.0018%28 Sept →
inferno13–10.0515%28 Sept →
anubis13–110.0210%26 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0616%26 Sept →
anubis13–110.039%25 Sept →
overpass13–60.0511%25 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0111%25 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0221%25 Sept →
overpass16–12-0.0224%19 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0317%18 Sept →
mirage13–8-0.0619%18 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0130%18 Sept →
mirage13–90.0120%18 Sept →
inferno16–13-0.0217%18 Sept →
mirage13–10-0.0423%18 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0214%2 Sept →
mirage6–130.0319%2 Sept →
nuke4–130.0120%2 Sept →
overpass13–100.076%2 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0411%2 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0417%1 Sept →
overpass16–12-0.0618%1 Sept →
overpass15–15-0.0211%28 Aug →
inferno12–16-0.049%27 Aug →
vertigo9–16-0.0218%27 Aug →
mirage15–15-0.0410%27 Aug →
cache16–120.0316%26 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0116%26 Aug →
vertigo8–160.008%26 Aug →
nuke4–16-0.0612%25 Aug →
overpass3–16-0.0710%25 Aug →
mirage16–80.0413%24 Aug →
nuke2–160.0315%24 Aug →
overpass16–60.0319%24 Aug →
anubis5–9-0.083%24 Aug →
cache16–14-0.0411%24 Aug →
mirage16–30.1121%20 Aug →
inferno13–16-0.036%19 Aug →
mirage7–16-0.069%17 Aug →
overpass6–16-0.0117%17 Aug →
inferno11–16-0.027%17 Aug →
overpass14–16-0.0113%17 Aug →
inferno16–10.033%16 Aug →
vertigo11–16-0.1010%16 Aug →
mirage9–10.0015%16 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0216%14 Aug →
cache9–16-0.0511%14 Aug →
mirage7–16-0.1011%13 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.