Agger

Agger — CS2 Stats

76561198021516750[U:1:61251022]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,044Tracked matches57%Win rate2020Tracked since
5,154Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating21,703Top 50% of 192,959 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.6% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#56041 of 240648 tracked
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (5 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 27 days played since 2 Jan 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,703 -4,705 2 Jan19 Sept · 18 days played
18,05026,580peak 26,5802 Jan19 Sept
26,716Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,198Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
27Days played since 2026-01-02

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,198
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 302 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,877 below peak (26,580)
  • +3,184 over 90 days
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 3,297 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches17
Win rate59%
K/D1.25
Headshot %53%

Measured 29 Aug 202624 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Pink band among CSDB-tracked players (n=38,294), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPink band medianRed band medianvs Red band
Headshot rate39.1%46.9%49.2%10.2% short
Shot accuracy15.6%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.111.081.12meets
Match win rate50.0%46.7%48.5%above

This profile matches the typical Red band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Red band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAggerPREMIER21,703 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,198csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning61
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53452Last 10053%Win rateWWWLWLWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −79ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 41 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 525ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 506ms

Last 20

  • 119 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 546ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility6.0
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch3.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 61% on CT to 31% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 552ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning6.1
Utility6.0
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.0
Win Impact7.2

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time562ms−22ms
first ⅓ avg 584ms → last ⅓ avg 562ms
Headshot accuracy15.6%−3.4%
first ⅓ avg 19.0% → last ⅓ avg 15.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 3 Apr
37%Best headshot accuracy · 4–13 · dust2, 27 Jan
398msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · inferno, 18 Sept
13–0Biggest win · ancient, 6 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W3Current streak
74In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

overpassBest map · 78% over 9dust2Weakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB26121446%0.02
ancientA25141156%0.01
nukeB21111052%0.03
overpassS97278%0.03
mirageB84450%0.03
dust2C52340%-0.02
anubisC52340%-0.03
cache110100%0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

123,188Lifetime kills
1.11K/D · Top 50% of Pink band
5,874Matches
50.0%Match win rate · Top 25% of Pink band
39.1%Headshot %
15.6%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Pink band
16,453MVPs
2,698Hours (in match)
8,491Bombs planted
1,950Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4733,246
AWP9,220
Tec-93,614
MAC-103,405
MP93,131
P903,077

Lifetime map wins

15,180nuke
11,456inferno
6,597vertigo
6,377dust2
1,677train
664office
349cbble
149lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

917Matches
54%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
84.8ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

35%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno4062%1.0715.2
Ancient3855%1.2717.7
Nuke2962%1.4718.7
Vertigo2352%1.3219.9
Mirage2227%1.0215.3
Anubis944%0.9214.7
Dust2933%0.9514.2
Overpass40%1.2120.3

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.0%Headshot accuracy
33.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
34.3%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
552msReaction time
30.9%T opening success
61.0%CT opening success
0.74Enemies flashed / flash
10.7%Flash assists
10.93HE damage / grenade
5.04Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 30.9107% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–11-0.0121%19 Sept
dust213–10-0.0611%19 Sept
nuke16–140.0116%19 Sept
inferno6–130.0014%18 Sept
nuke13–70.0717%18 Sept
dust28–130.0426%18 Sept
nuke13–30.158%18 Sept
mirage8–13-0.0819%16 Sept
ancient8–13-0.0221%16 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0514%7 Aug
ancient13–00.0830%6 Aug
anubis2–13-0.064%6 Aug
mirage8–20.0323%6 Aug
ancient13–110.0414%6 Aug
dust210–13-0.0516%1 Aug
cache13–110.0511%1 Aug
nuke4–130.0521%1 Aug
ancient13–70.0117%19 Jun
ancient8–130.0115%3 Apr
nuke13–20.019%3 Apr
dust213–6-0.0317%3 Apr
overpass16–120.0617%3 Apr
inferno13–30.1717%3 Apr
mirage4–13-0.038%3 Apr
mirage13–50.0314%3 Apr
mirage13–160.0515%2 Apr
inferno12–160.0516%2 Apr
inferno16–130.1013%2 Apr
ancient13–50.1018%2 Apr
ancient11–13-0.0021%2 Apr
mirage13–50.1415%2 Apr
nuke13–60.019%29 Mar
ancient13–7-0.047%29 Mar
inferno10–13-0.0418%29 Mar
overpass5–130.0119%21 Mar
ancient2–13-0.0818%21 Mar
inferno13–9-0.006%21 Mar
ancient9–13-0.0510%21 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0324%6 Mar
nuke13–50.0433%6 Mar
inferno9–130.0119%6 Mar
inferno16–120.0621%12 Feb
inferno11–130.0114%12 Feb
ancient8–13-0.0219%12 Feb
inferno13–60.0212%12 Feb
overpass13–40.0625%12 Feb
ancient9–13-0.019%10 Feb
inferno13–40.0925%10 Feb
inferno13–60.0628%10 Feb
ancient13–110.0313%10 Feb
inferno7–130.0326%10 Feb
inferno8–13-0.0424%10 Feb
nuke7–2-0.0420%9 Feb
anubis13–10-0.0216%9 Feb
ancient11–130.0514%9 Feb
mirage13–80.0414%9 Feb
nuke13–30.0132%9 Feb
inferno9–13-0.0013%9 Feb
ancient1–13-0.0711%9 Feb
inferno13–100.0321%1 Feb
ancient13–100.0417%1 Feb
nuke13–90.0316%1 Feb
overpass13–10.0214%1 Feb
anubis13–16-0.0710%1 Feb
overpass13–40.1210%31 Jan
nuke13–50.0718%31 Jan
mirage9–130.0514%31 Jan
inferno13–80.0716%31 Jan
anubis13–90.1033%31 Jan
ancient13–40.0916%27 Jan
nuke10–130.0212%27 Jan
dust24–13-0.0137%27 Jan
inferno13–50.0013%27 Jan
nuke9–130.0213%27 Jan
inferno4–130.0211%26 Jan
anubis2–13-0.078%26 Jan
inferno6–130.0117%26 Jan
nuke10–130.0220%26 Jan
ancient16–13-0.0113%26 Jan
nuke5–130.0225%25 Jan
ancient6–13-0.0626%25 Jan
nuke6–130.0320%25 Jan
inferno9–130.0517%25 Jan
overpass13–100.0318%25 Jan
nuke5–13-0.0530%18 Jan
ancient13–8-0.0220%18 Jan
nuke7–130.0218%13 Jan
ancient13–110.0521%13 Jan
nuke13–90.0718%12 Jan
nuke7–13-0.0225%12 Jan
overpass13–10.0013%12 Jan
overpass13–90.0220%12 Jan
inferno6–130.0113%11 Jan
inferno16–130.0119%11 Jan
ancient4–13-0.0116%11 Jan
ancient13–100.0216%11 Jan
ancient13–110.0322%9 Jan
nuke15–150.0214%3 Jan
inferno15–15-0.0328%3 Jan
ancient13–50.0418%2 Jan

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →