no1zz

no1zz — CS2 Stats

76561198016576418[U:1:56310690]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

1,760Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,262Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,519Top 25% of 201,197 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#47324 of 248159 tracked
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,039 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanThe Global Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Sep 2026 (8 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,519 -3,674 11 Mar – 25 Sept · 20 days played
22,51926,403peak 26,40311 Mar25 Sept
Faceit ELO: 2,039 +0 29 Aug – 3 Sept · 2 observations
2,0392,039peak 2,03929 Aug3 Sept
26,751Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,039Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
43Days played since 2026-03-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,039
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 461 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 3,884 below peak (26,403)
  • -3,604 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,481 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches21——
Win rate38%——
K/D1.17——
Headshot %45%——

Measured 3 Sep 2026 → 3 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,304), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate48.9%50.9%
Shot accuracy17.6%13.8%
Kill/death ratio1.551.09
Match win rate53.3%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGno1zzFACEITLevel 10 · 2,039 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPREMIER22,519 · Pink bandPEAK ELO2,039csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim84
Positioning53
Utility60

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–46–7Last 10047%Win rateWWWLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +30pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −89ms reaction

Win rate up 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 540ms

Last 20

  • 9–10–1 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 584ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.1 against its own average).

Aim8.4
Utility6.0
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch3.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 574ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.4
Positioning5.3
Utility6.0
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels1.3
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time578ms+1ms
first ⅓ avg 577ms → last ⅓ avg 578ms
Headshot accuracy19.9%−0.1%
first ⅓ avg 20.0% → last ⅓ avg 19.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.34Best match rating · 7–1 · mirage, 18 Mar →
42%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · anubis, 1 Apr →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–4 · cache, 12 May →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 6 May →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
4Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 56% over 16infernoWeakest map · 40% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C219–1243%0.01
mirageB2010–1050%0.05
cacheB199–1047%0.02
ancientA169–756%0.04
anubisB136–746%0.00
infernoC52–340%0.02
nuke—20–20%-0.08
overpass—11–0100%0.04
office—10–10%-0.02
stronghold—11–0100%0.04
warden—10–10%0.07

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (40% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

114,150Lifetime kills
1.55K/D · Top 5% of Level 10 players
4,733Matches
53.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 10 players
48.9%Headshot %
17.6%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players
13,341MVPs
2,565Hours (in match)
4,510Bombs planted
1,971Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4752,357
AWP4,034
FAMAS2,249
Molotov1,722

Lifetime map wins

7,789dust2
6,874inferno
2,060nuke
1,664cbble
912train
704vertigo
150lake
147office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,131Matches
52%Win rate
1.30Avg K/D
83.8ADR
42%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

36%1v1 clutch win
28%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8049%1.3018.3
Ancient7853%1.2817.0
Dust26948%1.2618.1
Anubis6067%1.3818.1
Inferno5954%1.2716.8
Overpass1155%1.1015.1
Nuke1030%1.2817.9
Train1040%1.0615.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.4%Headshot accuracy
37.9%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.0%Spray accuracy
80.7%Counter-strafing
7.7°Preaim
574msReaction time
31.5%T opening success
39.2%CT opening success
0.58Enemies flashed / flash
6.6%Flash assists
8.86HE damage / grenade
12.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 31.4978% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

40% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust213–40.068%28 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0213%25 Sept →
dust213–30.0927%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0316%24 Sept →
ancient13–90.0222%24 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0213%24 Sept →
anubis3–130.0126%23 Sept →
ancient13–90.1120%23 Sept →
ancient13–110.0325%23 Sept →
anubis8–13-0.0217%23 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0311%22 Sept →
mirage3–13-0.0310%22 Sept →
dust21–5-0.0629%22 Sept →
ancient15–150.0822%22 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0124%22 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0023%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0622%21 Sept →
ancient8–2-0.035%7 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0014%1 Sept →
dust213–20.0629%1 Sept →
anubis0–6-0.170%31 Aug →
mirage3–13-0.0136%31 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0418%31 Aug →
anubis13–7-0.0321%31 Aug →
ancient13–110.0430%18 May →
mirage13–110.0524%18 May →
cache13–40.0224%12 May →
cache5–130.0328%11 May →
dust213–90.1120%10 May →
cache13–90.0320%10 May →
cache13–40.0921%10 May →
cache11–130.0419%9 May →
cache13–100.1021%9 May →
ancient7–130.0323%9 May →
cache6–130.0324%9 May →
ancient13–50.1019%8 May →
cache11–13-0.0423%6 May →
cache3–13-0.0125%6 May →
cache13–00.1424%6 May →
overpass13–100.0422%4 May →
dust26–130.0120%4 May →
cache13–90.0315%4 May →
cache13–90.0117%4 May →
cache8–13-0.0432%30 Apr →
cache7–130.0132%30 Apr →
mirage4–10.0740%30 Apr →
cache7–13-0.0118%30 Apr →
cache11–13-0.0116%29 Apr →
cache13–110.0524%29 Apr →
dust213–9-0.0124%17 Apr →
dust210–130.0111%15 Apr →
inferno12–120.0110%13 Apr →
dust26–13-0.0416%8 Apr →
anubis13–60.0813%7 Apr →
dust213–60.0819%6 Apr →
mirage3–8-0.0013%4 Apr →
inferno13–70.0420%2 Apr →
dust213–100.0424%1 Apr →
anubis13–20.0342%1 Apr →
anubis10–130.0116%1 Apr →
anubis7–130.0520%31 Mar →
mirage13–50.0722%31 Mar →
dust213–10-0.0313%30 Mar →
ancient14–160.0222%28 Mar →
anubis13–90.0715%27 Mar →
anubis13–9-0.0214%27 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0420%27 Mar →
ancient10–130.0410%25 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0423%25 Mar →
anubis13–60.0114%25 Mar →
mirage13–70.0319%24 Mar →
nuke5–130.0117%24 Mar →
mirage12–120.0418%23 Mar →
ancient11–13-0.0113%22 Mar →
mirage13–30.0720%19 Mar →
anubis10–130.0110%19 Mar →
mirage9–130.0130%19 Mar →
mirage13–00.0515%18 Mar →
ancient7–130.0326%18 Mar →
nuke4–9-0.160%18 Mar →
mirage7–10.3418%18 Mar →
office6–13-0.0224%18 Mar →
ancient6–130.0419%17 Mar →
inferno12–120.0627%17 Mar →
mirage12–120.1224%17 Mar →
mirage12–120.0624%14 Mar →
mirage22–200.0819%13 Mar →
ancient13–50.0422%13 Mar →
stronghold13–60.0422%13 Mar →
warden5–130.0727%13 Mar →
inferno9–60.0332%13 Mar →
mirage13–70.0130%13 Mar →
anubis9–13-0.0222%13 Mar →
dust26–130.0118%12 Mar →
dust24–130.1022%12 Mar →
ancient13–100.0518%12 Mar →
ancient16–130.0220%12 Mar →
mirage12–120.0223%12 Mar →
mirage11–130.0010%11 Mar →
dust25–130.0024%11 Mar →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.