MikaeliX

MikaeliX — CS2 Stats

NO76561198013818798[U:1:53553070]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,445Tracked matches73%Win rate2021Tracked since
2,911Hours in CS30Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#8772 of 257905 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,307 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 26,603 +6,008 12 Nov – 27 May · 20 days played
20,59526,976peak 26,97612 Nov27 May
27,058Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,307Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
58Days played since 2025-09-17

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,307
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 44 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches37——
Win rate57%——
K/D6.74——
Headshot %88%——

Measured 26 Sep 2026 → 27 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate64.5%46.8%48.2%above
Shot accuracy12.7%13.0%13.2%0.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.591.061.07above
Match win rate44.0%46.3%46.9%3.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMikaeliXFACEITLevel 8 · 1,307 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,307csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning56
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT62–36–2Last 10062%Win rateLWWWWWLWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −0.9pp headshot accuracy · +10ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (−0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Last 10

  • 8–2 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 20

  • 14–6 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.9 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.3
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.9
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning5.6
Utility6.3
Mechanics6.9
Opening Duels2.5
Win Impact10.0

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time592ms−63ms
first ⅓ avg 655ms → last ⅓ avg 592ms
Headshot accuracy16.5%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 14.8% → last ⅓ avg 16.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 10–0 · inferno, 18 May →
35%Best headshot accuracy · 10–0 · inferno, 18 May →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · anubis, 22 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 14 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17dust2Weakest map · 45% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA3019–1163%0.01
ancientS1712–571%-0.01
mirageS1611–569%-0.01
dust2B115–645%-0.02
overpassB105–550%-0.01
anubisS75–271%-0.03
nukeA53–260%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.03
cache—10–10%-0.07
rooftop—11–0100%0.12
train—11–0100%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

180,044Lifetime kills
1.59K/D · Top 5% of Level 8 players
3,616Matches
44.0%Match win rate
64.5%Headshot % · Top 5% of Level 8 players
12.7%Shot accuracy
8,351MVPs
1,738Hours (in match)
3,529Bombs planted
1,301Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-47102,094
AWP8,924
FAMAS4,084
MP93,774
P902,326

Lifetime map wins

13,750dust2
6,599inferno
1,660nuke
1,226vertigo
359bank
299train
258lake
218cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

345Matches
53%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
75.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage9157%0.9714.3
Ancient6148%0.8613.4
Inferno5760%1.0414.0
Anubis4646%0.8513.5
Dust24154%1.1215.1
Nuke2143%0.9814.6
Overpass1070%1.2214.9
Vertigo757%0.9317.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.2%Headshot accuracy
39.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
41.2%Spray accuracy
81.1%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
594msReaction time
42.7%T opening success
37.4%CT opening success
0.47Enemies flashed / flash
6.9%Flash assists
9.57HE damage / grenade
10.95Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4729 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.4436% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust26–13-0.0622%27 Oct →
anubis13–60.0014%22 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.1014%18 Oct →
mirage13–100.059%17 Oct →
ancient13–110.0110%17 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0317%17 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0817%17 Oct →
mirage13–60.024%17 Oct →
inferno13–60.059%16 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0124%16 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.066%14 Oct →
inferno0–13-0.0620%14 Oct →
ancient13–110.0412%6 Oct →
inferno13–90.0116%4 Oct →
inferno13–100.0513%29 Sept →
vertigo6–9-0.0320%27 Sept →
inferno16–130.0417%26 Sept →
cache9–13-0.077%26 Sept →
inferno6–130.0112%20 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0026%1 Sept →
ancient3–6-0.0117%1 Sept →
ancient13–70.0327%26 Aug →
mirage13–50.1020%10 Jun →
overpass13–30.0523%27 May →
mirage13–80.0514%26 May →
nuke19–15-0.0115%26 May →
ancient14–160.0012%24 May →
ancient13–6-0.0412%24 May →
inferno13–4-0.0022%24 May →
inferno13–11-0.0519%21 May →
overpass5–130.0116%18 May →
inferno10–00.2135%18 May →
anubis9–13-0.0822%18 May →
inferno2–13-0.0813%18 May →
mirage13–8-0.0124%18 May →
inferno9–13-0.0415%12 May →
dust213–70.1022%12 May →
ancient9–13-0.0317%3 May →
inferno13–20.0517%1 May →
overpass2–13-0.0920%26 Apr →
dust213–40.0020%25 Apr →
inferno11–13-0.0313%25 Apr →
inferno13–80.1013%16 Apr →
dust213–100.0119%15 Apr →
nuke15–150.0314%15 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0413%14 Apr →
anubis5–13-0.0316%14 Apr →
ancient13–10.048%14 Apr →
anubis13–11-0.0316%12 Apr →
ancient10–13-0.0318%12 Apr →
anubis13–8-0.0215%9 Apr →
ancient11–130.019%5 Apr →
ancient13–5-0.097%3 Apr →
inferno13–9-0.055%3 Apr →
mirage13–60.0218%3 Apr →
dust23–13-0.0716%3 Apr →
overpass10–130.029%29 Mar →
inferno13–70.0520%29 Mar →
ancient16–13-0.0322%23 Mar →
dust24–13-0.078%22 Mar →
overpass13–70.0415%15 Mar →
inferno10–13-0.0623%14 Mar →
anubis16–14-0.0610%14 Mar →
inferno13–8-0.0022%14 Mar →
inferno13–70.0424%8 Mar →
inferno13–9-0.0114%8 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0418%7 Mar →
anubis13–90.0319%2 Mar →
dust213–40.0033%1 Mar →
mirage14–16-0.0118%9 Feb →
overpass8–13-0.027%9 Feb →
inferno13–90.0314%25 Jan →
inferno13–80.0910%25 Jan →
rooftop9–70.1214%2 Jan →
inferno9–30.1411%2 Jan →
inferno5–9-0.0222%2 Jan →
inferno9–13-0.0320%9 Dec →
train13–100.0220%8 Dec →
dust29–13-0.0324%7 Dec →
inferno10–130.0418%7 Dec →
nuke13–60.0310%1 Dec →
overpass13–5-0.0318%1 Dec →
mirage9–13-0.0413%30 Nov →
inferno15–15-0.039%24 Nov →
mirage2–13-0.0923%23 Nov →
overpass13–5-0.0611%23 Nov →
ancient13–7-0.0311%16 Nov →
dust212–15-0.0814%16 Nov →
dust213–110.0315%12 Nov →
mirage7–13-0.0910%12 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0220%4 Nov →
mirage19–17-0.0112%4 Nov →
overpass13–9-0.0010%29 Oct →
nuke13–30.0917%29 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.027%29 Oct →
ancient13–100.0116%26 Oct →
ancient13–7-0.0211%26 Oct →
ancient13–50.0113%29 Sept →
overpass4–130.0314%29 Sept →
inferno13–80.026%17 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.