+samsational🦩

+samsational🦩 β€” CS2 Stats

AT76561198009609692[U:1:49343964]Steam profile β†—

2,149Tracked matches52%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingPassive Rifler
Premier CS Rating20,000Top 50% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band Β· top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#16233 of 41396 tracked
FaceitLevel 7 Β· 1,675 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GG+samsational🦩FACEITLevel 7 · 1,675 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPREMIER20,000 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere β€” it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning41
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD47–49–4Last 10047%Win rateWLWLLWLLLT

Last 10 vs previous 10: -30pp win rate Β· +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Passive Rifler β€” Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim7.2
Aggression3.3
Utility3.7
Positioning4.1
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch2.4

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates β€” how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions β€” it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison β†’

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 31 points β€” deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game β€” the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 658ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start β€” warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers β€” no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning4.1
Utility3.7
Mechanics7.0
Opening Duels0.1
Win Impact5.6

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (Γ—1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first β…“ avg -0.02 β†’ last β…“ avg -0.01
Reaction time663ms+35ms
first β…“ avg 628ms β†’ last β…“ avg 663ms
Headshot accuracy16.7%+0.8%
first β…“ avg 15.9% β†’ last β…“ avg 16.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.07Best rating β€” anubis 13–5
13–2Biggest win β€” cache
4Longest win streak
8–4In matches decided by ≀2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map Β· 58% over 26nukeWeakest map Β· 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisA2615–1158%-0.00
infernoC218–1338%-0.03
ancientA2112–957%-0.02
dust2D134–931%-0.03
cacheB63–350%-0.02
nukeD51–420%0.01
overpassβ€”43–175%0.01
poseidonβ€”31–233%-0.02
debrisβ€”10–10%-0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,173Matches
50%Win rate
0.89Avg K/D
65.1ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
15%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient18947%0.8512.8
Anubis18757%0.9412.9
Dust211650%1.0713.8
Inferno7240%0.9413.2
Nuke6348%0.9213.4
Overpass5159%0.8311.1
Train2752%0.8913.0
Mirage1828%0.6711.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API β€” a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches β€” stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.1%Headshot accuracy
38.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
48.2%Spray accuracy
81.4%Counter-strafing
11.5Β°Preaim
658msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
30.7%CT opening success
0.34Enemies flashed / flash
3.7%Flash assists
9.78HE damage / grenade
2.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag β€” the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3378 β€” below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups β†’
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.7608% β€” below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics β€” lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games β€” your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy β†’Nuke grenade lineups β†’

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–50.078%16 Aug β†’
inferno4–13-0.0317%16 Aug β†’
anubis13–9-0.0218%16 Aug β†’
inferno4–13-0.048%12 Aug β†’
dust27–130.0112%12 Aug β†’
dust213–90.0525%11 Aug β†’
inferno9–13-0.0412%11 Aug β†’
dust29–13-0.0714%4 Aug β†’
inferno11–13-0.0520%4 Aug β†’
inferno15–15-0.0117%30 Jul β†’
anubis5–13-0.069%30 Jul β†’
ancient13–10-0.0324%30 Jul β†’
anubis13–110.0322%29 Jul β†’
cache6–13-0.0314%29 Jul β†’
inferno16–14-0.0319%29 Jul β†’
anubis13–60.0217%26 Jul β†’
ancient13–40.0217%26 Jul β†’
inferno12–16-0.0510%26 Jul β†’
ancient6–130.0116%26 Jul β†’
dust213–6-0.0621%26 Jul β†’
dust213–4-0.0031%23 Jul β†’
nuke10–130.0614%23 Jul β†’
anubis10–130.0020%23 Jul β†’
inferno8–3-0.0017%23 Jul β†’
cache13–70.0121%22 Jul β†’
ancient10–13-0.0419%22 Jul β†’
anubis6–13-0.0422%22 Jul β†’
anubis10–20.0328%22 Jul β†’
inferno9–10.0011%22 Jul β†’
poseidon8–8-0.0618%20 Jul β†’
debris8–8-0.068%20 Jul β†’
ancient13–6-0.0311%15 Jul β†’
cache13–9-0.0113%15 Jul β†’
inferno13–50.0116%15 Jul β†’
ancient6–13-0.048%12 Jul β†’
ancient12–16-0.0422%10 Jul β†’
anubis13–30.038%10 Jul β†’
dust21–13-0.0825%10 Jul β†’
cache13–2-0.0028%10 Jul β†’
inferno8–13-0.0830%10 Jul β†’
inferno13–8-0.069%6 Jul β†’
ancient13–60.0223%6 Jul β†’
anubis13–90.0420%6 Jul β†’
anubis13–11-0.0424%30 Jun β†’
dust24–13-0.1018%24 Jun β†’
ancient7–13-0.0414%24 Jun β†’
dust23–13-0.0120%24 Jun β†’
anubis9–130.0222%23 Jun β†’
anubis10–13-0.0411%23 Jun β†’
inferno5–13-0.028%22 Jun β†’
inferno13–70.0410%22 Jun β†’
anubis9–130.0216%21 Jun β†’
anubis10–13-0.0714%21 Jun β†’
ancient13–11-0.0715%21 Jun β†’
dust27–13-0.0514%16 Jun β†’
anubis8–13-0.0114%16 Jun β†’
ancient9–13-0.0114%16 Jun β†’
inferno10–13-0.0615%16 Jun β†’
ancient13–70.0012%15 Jun β†’
anubis16–130.0614%15 Jun β†’
inferno10–13-0.0314%14 Jun β†’
overpass13–80.0424%14 Jun β†’
ancient16–14-0.057%11 Jun β†’
anubis13–11-0.0111%11 Jun β†’
inferno13–7-0.0119%11 Jun β†’
dust214–16-0.0413%8 Jun β†’
ancient16–120.008%8 Jun β†’
dust212–16-0.0215%8 Jun β†’
ancient13–5-0.0215%4 Jun β†’
ancient13–11-0.019%4 Jun β†’
anubis13–110.0215%4 Jun β†’
cache4–13-0.0515%4 Jun β†’
dust213–100.0216%3 Jun β†’
anubis16–12-0.0211%3 Jun β†’
anubis13–60.0317%3 Jun β†’
overpass8–130.0528%1 Jun β†’
nuke13–5-0.0115%1 Jun β†’
anubis7–13-0.0319%25 May β†’
inferno16–130.0113%25 May β†’
ancient13–80.0515%20 May β†’
cache5–13-0.0611%17 May β†’
inferno3–13-0.085%17 May β†’
nuke1–13-0.0238%17 May β†’
anubis11–13-0.0215%16 May β†’
ancient5–13-0.0611%16 May β†’
overpass8–10.0121%16 May β†’
ancient10–13-0.0118%16 May β†’
anubis13–7-0.0513%16 May β†’
poseidon3–9-0.0811%16 May β†’
nuke8–80.024%16 May β†’
inferno7–90.007%16 May β†’
overpass13–3-0.0714%15 May β†’
ancient13–6-0.0113%15 May β†’
nuke7–13-0.0244%15 May β†’
dust210–13-0.0519%15 May β†’
inferno6–9-0.1824%15 May β†’
poseidon9–30.078%15 May β†’
anubis16–13-0.0512%15 May β†’
anubis9–13-0.0218%14 May β†’
ancient7–13-0.0617%14 May β†’

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone β†’Inventory value for this account β†’Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers β†’