RicFlairw000

RicFlairw000 — CS2 Stats

76561198007873751[U:1:47608023]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,814Tracked matches43%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,545Hours in CS10Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.6 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 4Top 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 31 Aug 2026 (45 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+41Tracked matches · now 2,814
−12.7ppWin rate · 55.6% → 42.9%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,711 -997 4 Jul – 6 Jul · 3 days played
17,71118,723peak 18,7234 Jul6 Jul
19,050Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-07-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches37——
Win rate35%——
K/D1.06——
Headshot %49%——

Measured 11 Sep 2026 → 15 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,247), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate41.4%42.7%43.7%2.3% short
Shot accuracy0.1%11.3%12.0%11.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.950.991.020.06 short
Match win rate42.9%43.9%44.7%1.8% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 5 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRicFlairw000FACEITLevel 4STANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim39
Positioning50
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–51–8Last 10041%Win rateLLLLWWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +0.6pp headshot accuracy · −2ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 614ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 596ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 597ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.5 against its own average).

Aim3.9
Utility7.0
Positioning5.0
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch1.0

Strong CT-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 61% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.78 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 615ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.9
Positioning5.0
Utility7.0
Mechanics6.5
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.6/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time612ms−57ms
first ⅓ avg 669ms → last ⅓ avg 612ms
Headshot accuracy15.2%+2.7%
first ⅓ avg 12.5% → last ⅓ avg 15.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.15Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 8 Aug →
33%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · dust2, 8 Aug →
469msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · mirage, 12 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 14 Jul →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L4Current streak
6–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
3Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 12mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C208–1240%0.02
nukeD165–1131%-0.03
infernoD165–1131%-0.01
anubisS128–467%0.01
cacheD124–833%-0.02
ancientA95–456%0.01
mirageD51–420%-0.04
vertigo—42–250%-0.00
train—33–0100%0.05
office—20–20%-0.06
overpass—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

57,700Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
4,012Matches
42.9%Match win rate
41.4%Headshot %
0.1%Shot accuracy
6,728MVPs
1,400Hours (in match)
6,224Bombs planted
636Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

11,176dust2
4,753nuke
3,810inferno
3,139train
2,315vertigo
215office
44italy
37cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

15Matches
47%Win rate
0.73Avg K/D
59.0ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

25%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2560%0.839.4
Mirage333%0.628.0
Ancient250%0.7311.0
Inferno250%0.8712.0
Nuke1100%1.2018.0
Vertigo10%0.294.0
Anubis10%0.244.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.5%Headshot accuracy
30.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
31.7%Spray accuracy
79.1%Counter-strafing
13.6°Preaim
615msReaction time
29.1%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.78Enemies flashed / flash
5.1%Flash assists
7.32HE damage / grenade
15.38Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.6349° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.4968% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient5–13-0.0617%14 Oct →
anubis5–130.0213%14 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.060%14 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0016%14 Oct →
dust213–80.0321%14 Oct →
ancient13–70.0512%11 Oct →
dust213–70.0712%11 Oct →
train13–20.1523%11 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0112%11 Oct →
inferno13–110.0414%10 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0320%7 Oct →
vertigo13–10-0.0110%4 Oct →
dust213–80.0113%4 Oct →
inferno10–130.0015%4 Oct →
nuke3–13-0.0417%4 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.036%4 Oct →
ancient7–130.0810%3 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0514%3 Oct →
anubis13–40.0318%30 Sept →
inferno7–130.0211%30 Sept →
anubis3–130.0425%27 Sept →
vertigo12–120.0321%25 Sept →
cache4–13-0.075%25 Sept →
dust213–20.0819%25 Sept →
inferno7–90.0216%25 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0415%19 Sept →
anubis13–70.0621%19 Sept →
inferno12–12-0.0015%19 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0117%16 Sept →
vertigo13–5-0.0113%12 Sept →
dust213–40.0214%12 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.0717%12 Sept →
inferno4–9-0.0127%12 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0116%6 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0211%6 Sept →
ancient13–30.048%5 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0317%5 Sept →
ancient13–7-0.0214%3 Sept →
nuke11–130.0011%3 Sept →
inferno3–4-0.0414%3 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0420%3 Sept →
vertigo8–13-0.0316%30 Aug →
train13–5-0.014%30 Aug →
inferno13–110.0912%29 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0311%29 Aug →
cache13–8-0.0110%29 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.064%23 Aug →
dust212–60.0226%23 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0112%23 Aug →
mirage13–11-0.0413%22 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0019%22 Aug →
nuke8–80.0216%22 Aug →
dust28–130.0026%20 Aug →
anubis13–90.0424%20 Aug →
cache13–10-0.098%20 Aug →
nuke4–13-0.0416%20 Aug →
inferno12–12-0.0613%20 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0312%15 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0724%15 Aug →
dust212–12-0.005%15 Aug →
nuke9–130.0317%9 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0111%9 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0120%8 Aug →
ancient13–60.0228%8 Aug →
dust213–40.1533%8 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0817%30 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.088%30 Jul →
nuke13–6-0.0219%29 Jul →
cache13–4-0.029%29 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0510%29 Jul →
anubis13–6-0.018%28 Jul →
cache9–13-0.0211%27 Jul →
anubis13–30.004%26 Jul →
cache8–13-0.0521%26 Jul →
train13–90.029%26 Jul →
nuke13–60.0118%26 Jul →
anubis13–70.027%26 Jul →
mirage12–12-0.0410%21 Jul →
ancient12–12-0.0110%21 Jul →
cache5–130.0210%21 Jul →
dust213–00.068%14 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0113%14 Jul →
dust211–13-0.038%12 Jul →
office8–13-0.0620%12 Jul →
office5–13-0.0617%12 Jul →
inferno13–8-0.0415%6 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0211%6 Jul →
nuke15–15-0.0911%6 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0210%6 Jul →
ancient10–13-0.0310%6 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0112%6 Jul →
nuke5–13-0.0110%5 Jul →
overpass3–13-0.0414%5 Jul →
cache8–130.0017%5 Jul →
dust28–130.0314%5 Jul →
anubis13–16-0.0416%5 Jul →
nuke16–13-0.0610%5 Jul →
dust211–130.0318%5 Jul →
ancient13–9-0.0216%4 Jul →
cache13–110.0818%1 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.