HelskogBiceps

HelskogBiceps — CS2 Stats

NO76561198005637590[U:1:45371862]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,341Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,094Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.3 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 8Top 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 5 Oct 2026 (31 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+65Tracked matches · now 1,341
0.0ppWin rate · 43.3% → 43.3%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 8,894 -776 17 Jun – 1 Jul · 5 days played
8,8949,670peak 9,67017 Jun1 Jul
Faceit ELO: 1,731 +0 20 Sept – 5 Oct · 4 observations
1,7311,731peak 1,73120 Sept5 Oct
9,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,731Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-06-12

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches8042+38
Win rate51%43%+8pp
K/D0.700.71−0.01
Headshot %43%44%−1pp

Measured 5 Oct 2026 → 5 Nov 2026; previous 8 Sep 2026 → 5 Oct 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,525), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate36.8%46.8%48.2%11.5% short
Shot accuracy8.8%13.0%13.2%4.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.941.061.070.13 short
Match win rate41.7%46.3%46.9%5.2% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 9 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHelskogBicepsFACEITLevel 8STANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO1,731csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim67
Positioning54
Utility59

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY43–56–1Last 10043%Win rateWWLLWLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −1.8pp headshot accuracy · +5ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 13%
  • Avg reaction 512ms

Last 10

  • 5–5 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 518ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.1 against its own average).

Aim6.7
Utility5.9
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels4.1
Clutch3.8

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 84% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 56% on CT to 29% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.7
Positioning5.4
Utility5.9
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels3.3
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time518ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 518ms
Headshot accuracy14.1%−1.7%
first ⅓ avg 15.8% → last ⅓ avg 14.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.21Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 27 Jun →
27%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · dust2, 9 Aug →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–7 · ancient, 17 Aug →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 2 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
10–13In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5anubisWeakest map · 36% over 22
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC3513–2237%0.00
anubisC228–1436%0.01
ancientB158–753%-0.01
dust2C125–742%-0.02
cacheS54–180%0.01
nukeA53–260%0.00
inferno—42–250%-0.01
vertigo—20–20%-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 22). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

84,265Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
4,041Matches
41.7%Match win rate
36.8%Headshot %
8.8%Shot accuracy
8,967MVPs
2,094Hours (in match)
4,937Bombs planted
1,008Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4725,648
AWP7,295
MP93,530
MAC-103,203
P2502,365
P902,003

Lifetime map wins

7,793dust2
4,905inferno
1,835nuke
626vertigo
450train
313office
181cbble
47dust

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,117Matches
51%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
77.0ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

39%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage31948%0.9914.7
Ancient21855%0.9915.3
Anubis20851%0.9815.1
Dust215156%0.9914.9
Inferno10853%0.9414.7
Nuke4245%0.9815.9
Train2560%0.9714.2
Cache2250%1.0216.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.8%Spray accuracy
72.6%Counter-strafing
10.3°Preaim
516msReaction time
28.9%T opening success
56.3%CT opening success
0.60Enemies flashed / flash
6.4%Flash assists
8.82HE damage / grenade
11.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.0957% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.9377% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 22 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0515%29 Oct →
anubis13–30.128%29 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0420%29 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0413%24 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.018%23 Oct →
dust211–13-0.038%21 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.068%21 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0116%4 Oct →
mirage13–70.0410%2 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.018%20 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0314%19 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.035%19 Sept →
cache13–70.0115%19 Sept →
mirage13–9-0.0011%19 Sept →
mirage10–130.0722%18 Sept →
anubis8–130.0312%18 Sept →
anubis13–110.1310%12 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0119%12 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0715%4 Sept →
anubis13–7-0.0112%18 Aug →
mirage13–10-0.0021%17 Aug →
mirage3–130.0014%17 Aug →
mirage13–80.0118%17 Aug →
ancient10–13-0.0316%17 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0220%17 Aug →
anubis6–130.0116%17 Aug →
anubis11–130.0326%17 Aug →
ancient13–7-0.0517%17 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0219%16 Aug →
cache13–90.006%16 Aug →
anubis16–19-0.0510%16 Aug →
vertigo9–13-0.0217%12 Aug →
ancient11–130.0315%12 Aug →
cache13–20.0724%12 Aug →
nuke13–110.0220%12 Aug →
ancient7–130.018%12 Aug →
dust213–11-0.019%12 Aug →
anubis22–19-0.0411%12 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0613%12 Aug →
mirage8–13-0.017%11 Aug →
anubis17–19-0.0113%11 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0817%11 Aug →
mirage5–13-0.0220%10 Aug →
anubis13–30.149%10 Aug →
mirage13–16-0.0617%9 Aug →
dust213–7-0.0227%9 Aug →
mirage10–13-0.0414%9 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0114%9 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.048%9 Aug →
mirage9–130.0012%9 Aug →
nuke13–16-0.0716%4 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.086%4 Aug →
mirage13–70.0322%4 Aug →
mirage9–13-0.0322%4 Aug →
anubis10–13-0.049%4 Aug →
mirage13–100.0111%2 Aug →
ancient13–11-0.047%2 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0316%2 Aug →
dust213–80.0524%2 Aug →
mirage11–13-0.006%2 Aug →
dust211–13-0.0517%2 Aug →
dust213–0-0.0111%2 Aug →
dust213–90.0614%31 Jul →
vertigo9–130.0212%31 Jul →
anubis13–90.1211%31 Jul →
mirage11–130.0819%31 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0822%30 Jul →
mirage9–10.1324%30 Jul →
ancient5–13-0.049%30 Jul →
mirage19–17-0.0423%21 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0411%21 Jul →
ancient13–90.0118%21 Jul →
mirage13–10-0.018%21 Jul →
cache13–10-0.0312%21 Jul →
mirage13–70.066%21 Jul →
mirage6–130.0610%14 Jul →
mirage15–150.0811%1 Jul →
nuke9–130.0116%27 Jun →
mirage13–70.0513%27 Jun →
ancient13–20.2114%27 Jun →
dust27–13-0.0220%27 Jun →
ancient11–13-0.0319%25 Jun →
mirage13–10-0.0619%25 Jun →
mirage13–70.0517%25 Jun →
inferno13–10-0.0316%25 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0510%25 Jun →
nuke16–120.0522%25 Jun →
mirage9–13-0.0119%25 Jun →
anubis7–130.0714%25 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.0216%24 Jun →
ancient13–10-0.0620%24 Jun →
anubis9–13-0.1021%24 Jun →
ancient13–40.0115%24 Jun →
inferno4–130.0714%24 Jun →
mirage2–13-0.0716%23 Jun →
mirage6–130.0220%17 Jun →
mirage5–130.0214%17 Jun →
anubis16–140.0520%17 Jun →
nuke13–11-0.0122%17 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.0415%12 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.