r0ck_re?

r0ck_re? — CS2 Stats

AT76561198004499050[U:1:44233322]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,794Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,575Hours in CS14Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,103Top 50% of 213,211 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.4% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#82080 of 259896 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanLegendary Eagle Master
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 3 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,103 +1,134 31 Aug – 3 Nov · 31 days played
17,76720,940peak 20,94031 Aug3 Nov
21,045Peak Premier in tracked matches
30Days played since 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 837 below peak (20,940)
  • +503 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 4,897 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-04
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-04

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate46.9%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy13.1%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio0.941.021.030.10 short
Match win rate42.1%44.7%45.2%3.1% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGr0ck_re?FACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER20,103 · Pink bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim71
Positioning56
Utility46

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT51–42–7Last 10051%Win rateTWWWWWWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +40pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · +25ms reaction

Win rate up 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–0–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 528ms

Last 10

  • 8–1–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 12–5–3 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim7.1
Utility4.6
Positioning5.6
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch5.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 60% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 60% on T to 36% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.1
Positioning5.6
Utility4.6
Mechanics6.0
Opening Duels4.5
Win Impact6.3

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time529ms−42ms
first ⅓ avg 571ms → last ⅓ avg 529ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+1.1%
first ⅓ avg 17.0% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–5 · nuke, 9 Oct →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · anubis, 17 Oct →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · ancient, 30 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 31 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
12–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 80% over 5dust2Weakest map · 13% over 16
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2216–673%0.01
infernoA2112–957%-0.00
dust2D162–1413%-0.04
ancientB137–654%-0.01
mirageA106–460%-0.02
anubisD62–433%-0.00
officeC52–340%-0.02
cacheS54–180%-0.03
poseidon—10–10%-0.20
vertigo—10–10%-0.09

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 16). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

70,059Lifetime kills
0.94K/D
3,616Matches
42.1%Match win rate
46.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 5 players
13.1%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
7,836MVPs
1,493Hours (in match)
2,499Bombs planted
634Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

6,078dust2
5,794inferno
4,569nuke
1,864train
1,235vertigo
977cbble
542office
379italy

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

138Matches
47%Win rate
0.98Avg K/D
86.4ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

46%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage1753%1.0915.5
Dust21560%1.1916.9
Ancient1346%0.9214.8
Anubis1258%0.9315.0
Vertigo1040%0.7112.3
Nuke1060%1.3415.6
Inferno520%1.1112.8
Overpass20%1.0623.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
35.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.0%Spray accuracy
77.2%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
527msReaction time
60.2%T opening success
36.2%CT opening success
0.38Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
10.05HE damage / grenade
7.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.3806 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.2101% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 16 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
office12–120.0421%3 Nov →
ancient16–120.0216%3 Nov →
inferno13–11-0.0510%3 Nov →
mirage16–13-0.0120%3 Nov →
ancient16–14-0.0512%31 Oct →
office13–9-0.0510%31 Oct →
nuke13–10.0823%31 Oct →
nuke9–40.0630%29 Oct →
inferno9–20.1019%29 Oct →
mirage1–13-0.109%29 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0310%28 Oct →
ancient2–130.0229%28 Oct →
ancient15–15-0.049%28 Oct →
anubis13–90.0216%28 Oct →
inferno9–6-0.0210%28 Oct →
inferno15–150.0112%24 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0231%24 Oct →
inferno11–130.0013%24 Oct →
inferno14–16-0.0112%23 Oct →
nuke13–30.0315%23 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0316%23 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0218%19 Oct →
nuke11–13-0.0221%18 Oct →
cache10–13-0.0325%18 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0414%18 Oct →
inferno13–40.0428%18 Oct →
nuke7–130.0322%18 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0516%17 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0213%17 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0619%17 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0224%17 Oct →
nuke16–130.0321%17 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0434%17 Oct →
poseidon3–9-0.200%17 Oct →
nuke5–9-0.1126%17 Oct →
inferno8–8-0.0929%17 Oct →
vertigo8–8-0.099%17 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0411%16 Oct →
nuke13–80.0621%16 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0512%16 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0024%15 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.0519%12 Oct →
nuke9–20.0819%12 Oct →
anubis8–130.0223%11 Oct →
mirage13–70.0524%11 Oct →
dust22–13-0.1525%11 Oct →
nuke13–50.1127%9 Oct →
cache13–110.0120%9 Oct →
mirage13–50.0628%9 Oct →
ancient4–13-0.0810%7 Oct →
inferno13–90.0015%7 Oct →
dust213–160.0421%7 Oct →
ancient13–60.0325%7 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0712%6 Oct →
mirage13–7-0.0217%6 Oct →
inferno13–80.0610%6 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0313%6 Oct →
nuke9–6-0.0125%6 Oct →
ancient13–110.0222%30 Sept →
inferno13–20.085%30 Sept →
cache13–1-0.0916%27 Sept →
nuke13–110.008%27 Sept →
dust213–10-0.0421%27 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0320%27 Sept →
inferno11–130.0129%26 Sept →
nuke13–90.0215%26 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0318%26 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0811%26 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0011%25 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.0619%25 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0419%25 Sept →
anubis14–16-0.0214%25 Sept →
nuke13–50.0618%25 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0122%25 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0617%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0515%22 Sept →
inferno5–130.0019%22 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0619%20 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0411%20 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.039%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0212%20 Sept →
anubis16–140.0215%20 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0116%20 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0416%20 Sept →
nuke13–100.0116%19 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0227%14 Sept →
inferno16–130.0521%14 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0424%14 Sept →
nuke16–140.0112%12 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0022%12 Sept →
nuke13–110.0012%10 Sept →
ancient13–100.0220%10 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0411%9 Sept →
ancient13–100.0114%9 Sept →
ancient10–130.0914%2 Sept →
office13–8-0.0013%2 Sept →
office5–13-0.0626%2 Sept →
office5–13-0.0127%2 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0819%2 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0419%31 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.