✪Kævl™

✪Kævl™ — CS2 Stats

76561198002717786[U:1:42452058]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,370Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,795Hours in CS11Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.8 DevelopingSupport
FaceitLevel 7 · 1,502 ELOTop 42.3% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Sep 2026 (17 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 1,502 → 1,502
+15Tracked matches · now 1,370
+3.3ppWin rate · 46.7% → 50.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 51 days played since 4 Apr 2025. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

18,049Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,502Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
51Days played since 2025-04-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,502
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 29 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-06
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-09-06

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 7 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,280), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 7 medianLevel 8 medianvs Level 8
Headshot rate36.1%45.7%46.8%10.7% short
Shot accuracy12.5%12.7%13.0%0.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.001.051.060.06 short
Match win rate47.9%45.7%46.3%above

This profile matches the typical Level 8 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 8 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG✪Kævl™FACEITLevel 7 · 1,502 ELOSTANDINGTop 42.3% of rankedPEAK ELO1,502csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim57
Positioning55
Utility64

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY4753Last 10047%Win rateWWWLLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.5pp headshot accuracy · −117ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 488ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 516ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 575ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.3 against its own average).

Aim5.7
Utility6.4
Positioning5.5
Opening Duels1.9
Clutch2.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 72% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 25% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 597ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.7
Positioning5.5
Utility6.4
Mechanics4.2
Opening Duels1.8
Win Impact5.0

Composite 4.8/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time608ms−32ms
first ⅓ avg 640ms → last ⅓ avg 608ms
Headshot accuracy16.2%−0.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 16.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–0 · nuke, 22 Jan
34%Best headshot accuracy · 7–13 · inferno, 25 Nov
391msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · nuke, 30 Aug
13–0Biggest win · nuke, 22 Jan

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
W3Current streak
88In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 83% over 6overpassWeakest map · 32% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeC2181338%0.02
overpassD1961332%0.02
ancientS139469%0.02
anubisB136746%0.02
infernoB105550%0.01
dust2C73443%-0.02
mirageS65183%0.03
trainC52340%-0.01
vertigo42250%0.01
cache21150%0.06

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (32% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

53,151Lifetime kills
1.00K/D
3,089Matches
47.9%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 7 players
36.1%Headshot %
12.5%Shot accuracy
6,859MVPs
1,578Hours (in match)
3,819Bombs planted
874Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

10,047inferno
6,299nuke
3,084vertigo
1,053train
993dust2
121office
59lake
55cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,034Matches
50%Win rate
1.15Avg K/D
80.7ADR
38%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Nuke8962%1.4216.4
Anubis7240%1.1115.9
Ancient5648%1.1415.7
Vertigo5360%1.4117.3
Inferno3355%1.0914.7
Overpass2429%1.1917.0
Mirage2143%1.1417.9
Train1338%1.2314.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.5%Headshot accuracy
35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.1%Spray accuracy
69.0%Counter-strafing
10.4°Preaim
597msReaction time
24.8%T opening success
44.3%CT opening success
0.70Enemies flashed / flash
5.7%Flash assists
9.19HE damage / grenade
10.03Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 24.8112% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

32% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
vertigo13–70.0511%17 Sept
ancient16–120.0320%30 Aug
ancient13–100.0422%30 Aug
nuke8–130.0416%30 Aug
anubis7–130.0221%27 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0229%27 Aug
cache13–110.0522%29 Jun
overpass9–130.1518%3 Jun
nuke16–13-0.0111%1 Jun
overpass7–13-0.038%7 May
anubis13–100.038%7 May
dust26–13-0.0120%3 May
cache2–130.0819%30 Apr
anubis9–13-0.0512%30 Apr
nuke9–13-0.0623%26 Apr
overpass13–20.0610%12 Apr
nuke13–60.0117%12 Apr
overpass5–130.0111%12 Apr
dust213–5-0.0123%29 Mar
inferno13–40.1524%27 Mar
dust213–40.0121%27 Mar
mirage13–10-0.0111%27 Mar
overpass13–100.044%27 Mar
anubis13–70.1216%22 Mar
dust26–130.0015%19 Mar
dust23–13-0.073%19 Mar
dust213–5-0.0418%19 Mar
ancient6–130.0122%15 Mar
nuke11–130.0718%5 Mar
nuke11–13-0.0316%1 Mar
vertigo8–130.0113%27 Feb
nuke5–13-0.0213%27 Feb
inferno16–120.0422%27 Feb
anubis13–110.0415%27 Feb
anubis6–13-0.026%26 Feb
nuke13–110.0411%26 Feb
nuke3–130.0019%22 Feb
ancient16–130.0316%15 Feb
anubis10–13-0.0216%15 Feb
overpass13–10-0.0214%8 Feb
overpass4–13-0.0218%5 Feb
overpass11–130.0619%5 Feb
ancient6–13-0.0213%5 Feb
overpass6–13-0.0215%1 Feb
overpass13–100.0213%30 Jan
inferno8–13-0.0610%30 Jan
vertigo7–13-0.0512%30 Jan
ancient11–13-0.0113%30 Jan
anubis5–13-0.0318%29 Jan
overpass4–13-0.026%29 Jan
anubis13–50.0219%29 Jan
anubis8–130.0822%28 Jan
inferno16–140.0326%28 Jan
anubis13–60.039%28 Jan
vertigo13–50.0321%28 Jan
ancient13–80.0213%25 Jan
nuke13–00.1619%22 Jan
anubis13–10-0.0417%22 Jan
inferno13–110.0316%11 Jan
overpass13–50.0218%11 Jan
nuke9–13-0.0018%11 Jan
overpass10–13-0.0220%28 Dec
train13–80.1025%11 Dec
nuke13–8-0.0113%30 Nov
mirage16–120.0924%25 Nov
train11–13-0.0319%25 Nov
inferno7–13-0.0134%25 Nov
overpass3–90.0322%23 Nov
overpass10–130.1017%21 Nov
train1–13-0.1229%21 Nov
overpass1–5-0.037%21 Nov
inferno6–13-0.0716%21 Nov
overpass13–40.1317%14 Nov
train13–80.0118%14 Nov
overpass11–13-0.0212%14 Nov
inferno9–13-0.038%30 Oct
ancient13–9-0.0213%30 Oct
ancient9–13-0.069%26 Oct
inferno10–13-0.0123%23 Oct
nuke3–130.0119%23 Oct
dust29–13-0.0115%22 Oct
ancient13–30.0521%19 Oct
nuke13–100.0716%19 Oct
mirage19–17-0.0218%12 Oct
nuke13–80.0621%2 Oct
overpass8–130.0011%11 Sept
ancient13–100.0824%3 Jul
inferno13–80.0317%3 Jul
mirage4–13-0.0210%27 May
mirage16–120.0318%27 May
nuke3–13-0.0014%27 May
nuke11–130.0223%16 May
train12–16-0.0029%16 May
anubis8–130.0216%16 May
ancient13–9-0.0017%5 May
nuke10–130.026%5 May
nuke11–130.0222%5 May
mirage13–110.0718%4 Apr
ancient13–90.0611%4 Apr
nuke13–110.0819%4 Apr

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →