Triggerboy´bT

Triggerboy´bT — CS2 Stats

76561197999599548[U:1:39333820]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,200Tracked matches38%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,022Hours in CS38Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,999Top 50% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#85332 of 259559 tracked
FaceitLevel 5Top 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

−1Premier CS Rating · 20,000 → 19,999

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,999 +1,820 23 Sept – 2 Nov · 35 days played
18,11124,523peak 24,52323 Sept2 Nov
24,523Peak Premier in tracked matches
34Days played since 2026-09-23

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,524 below peak (24,523)
  • +1,085 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-23
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-23

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,283), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate56.2%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy18.4%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.471.021.03above
Match win rate45.2%44.7%45.2%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 6 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGTriggerboy´bTFACEITLevel 5STANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER19,999 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim83
Positioning45
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWLWWLLLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −19ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 491ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 498ms

Last 20

  • 7–12–1 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 507ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.8 against its own average).

Aim8.3
Utility7.6
Positioning4.5
Opening Duels1.1
Clutch2.2

Strong CT-side openerHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 37 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 45% on CT to 28% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.3
Positioning4.5
Utility7.6
Mechanics5.0
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact1.0

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time513ms−25ms
first ⅓ avg 539ms → last ⅓ avg 513ms
Headshot accuracy23.9%−0.2%
first ⅓ avg 24.2% → last ⅓ avg 23.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · inferno, 14 Oct →
57%Best headshot accuracy · 13–7 · nuke, 7 Oct →
367msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · ancient, 31 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 19 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
6–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 10anubisWeakest map · 38% over 13
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2312–1152%0.01
infernoC187–1139%0.02
mirageC156–940%0.01
anubisC135–838%0.02
cacheA117–464%0.03
nukeS107–370%0.01
ancientB105–550%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (38% over 13). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

144,297Lifetime kills
1.47K/D · Top 10% of Level 5 players
5,407Matches
45.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 5 players
56.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 5 players
18.4%Shot accuracy · Top 10% of Level 5 players
14,423MVPs
2,427Hours (in match)
5,117Bombs planted
1,586Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4745,627
AWP12,325
Tec-93,996
P2503,917
P903,192
MAC-103,084

Lifetime map wins

12,012inferno
10,188dust2
4,570nuke
2,552train
2,006cbble
247vertigo
192lake
138aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

98Matches
54%Win rate
1.21Avg K/D
79.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

31%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust2862%1.3914.5
Ancient333%1.1216.7
Inferno250%0.8614.0
Cache250%1.0914.5
Anubis1100%0.8917.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

23.4%Headshot accuracy
37.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.7%Spray accuracy
72.5%Counter-strafing
8.9°Preaim
511msReaction time
28.2%T opening success
45.1%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
6.5%Flash assists
14.45HE damage / grenade
13.09Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 28.2092% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

38% win rate across 13 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–60.0415%2 Nov →
inferno11–130.0031%2 Nov →
nuke13–30.0114%1 Nov →
ancient13–60.0824%1 Nov →
inferno11–13-0.0024%1 Nov →
mirage8–130.0126%1 Nov →
ancient5–130.0122%31 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0131%31 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0520%31 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0210%31 Oct →
cache13–20.1325%30 Oct →
anubis11–130.0418%30 Oct →
ancient8–130.0931%30 Oct →
dust215–15-0.0120%29 Oct →
inferno9–130.0218%29 Oct →
nuke9–130.0119%29 Oct →
inferno13–110.0127%28 Oct →
mirage11–130.0124%28 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0711%27 Oct →
dust213–90.1129%27 Oct →
cache9–10.0740%27 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0531%26 Oct →
ancient13–100.0824%26 Oct →
anubis6–130.0030%26 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0011%25 Oct →
cache6–13-0.0736%25 Oct →
dust20–13-0.0831%25 Oct →
cache8–130.0519%25 Oct →
anubis13–8-0.0130%25 Oct →
nuke13–50.0521%24 Oct →
nuke4–13-0.0836%24 Oct →
mirage13–100.0222%24 Oct →
cache13–100.0221%24 Oct →
inferno7–130.0624%24 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0632%23 Oct →
anubis8–130.0425%23 Oct →
cache5–130.0426%23 Oct →
mirage7–130.0023%22 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0317%22 Oct →
dust211–130.0424%22 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0416%22 Oct →
dust213–100.0212%21 Oct →
inferno13–160.0222%21 Oct →
anubis13–100.0118%20 Oct →
dust213–20.0217%20 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0129%20 Oct →
cache11–130.0221%19 Oct →
dust213–8-0.0613%19 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0013%19 Oct →
dust213–10.0226%19 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0714%18 Oct →
dust213–70.0017%18 Oct →
inferno13–50.0227%18 Oct →
anubis9–130.0310%18 Oct →
cache13–70.0831%18 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0228%17 Oct →
dust213–80.0128%17 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0322%17 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0529%16 Oct →
nuke11–00.0438%16 Oct →
ancient10–130.0523%16 Oct →
nuke13–80.0628%15 Oct →
anubis16–13-0.0521%15 Oct →
dust215–150.0934%14 Oct →
inferno13–40.1429%14 Oct →
dust213–50.0434%14 Oct →
ancient16–140.0224%14 Oct →
cache13–40.0011%13 Oct →
nuke13–60.0516%13 Oct →
inferno9–130.0325%13 Oct →
dust25–130.0216%13 Oct →
inferno13–90.0430%12 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.0341%12 Oct →
dust213–70.0525%12 Oct →
dust213–50.0630%12 Oct →
ancient13–50.0323%11 Oct →
anubis9–130.0213%8 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0257%7 Oct →
anubis7–130.1224%6 Oct →
inferno13–20.0138%6 Oct →
cache13–20.1036%6 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0120%5 Oct →
ancient13–3-0.0020%5 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0736%4 Oct →
inferno13–4-0.019%4 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0621%4 Oct →
mirage15–150.0022%4 Oct →
inferno7–130.0210%4 Oct →
mirage15–150.0221%2 Oct →
mirage13–70.1424%2 Oct →
mirage13–110.0538%30 Sept →
mirage11–130.0020%30 Sept →
anubis13–50.0919%29 Sept →
dust211–130.0623%29 Sept →
mirage13–110.0620%28 Sept →
inferno7–130.0820%28 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0213%28 Sept →
inferno13–80.0119%25 Sept →
nuke13–10.0230%25 Sept →
dust213–80.0130%24 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.