zelda

zelda — CS2 Stats

76561197962397540[U:1:2131812]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

215Tracked matches43%Win rate2024Tracked since
307Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.8 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating25,529Top 10% of 212,695 CSDB-tracked playersRed band · top ~2.7% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#17109 of 259576 tracked
WingmanGold Nova III
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Oct 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 25,529 +11,082 4 Dec – 30 Oct · 20 days played
14,44727,017peak 27,0174 Dec30 Oct
27,296Peak Premier in tracked matches
33Days played since 2025-11-04

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,488 below peak (27,017)
  • +1,538 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Gold band at 30,000 — 4,471 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Red band among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,318), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerRed band medianGold band medianvs Gold band
Headshot rate54.5%49.3%50.9%above
Shot accuracy0.0%13.4%11.8%11.8% short
Kill/death ratio1.351.121.18above
Match win rate54.9%48.5%51.9%above

This profile matches the typical Gold band player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Gold band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGzeldaPREMIER25,529 · Red bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim80
Positioning48
Utility63

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51–45–4Last 10051%Win rateLWWLLWWLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.8pp headshot accuracy · +42ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 633ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.8 against its own average).

Aim8.0
Utility6.3
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower opening-duel success.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 567ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.0
Positioning4.8
Utility6.3
Mechanics5.1
Opening Duels1.9
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.8/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.05 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.03 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time583ms−56ms
first ⅓ avg 638ms → last ⅓ avg 583ms
Headshot accuracy19.5%−1.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.3% → last ⅓ avg 19.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.19Best match rating · 13–4 · dust2, 19 Feb →
56%Best headshot accuracy · 8–8 · nuke, 28 Sept →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · inferno, 18 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · dust2, 13 Apr →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
8–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 61% over 18ancientWeakest map · 42% over 12
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2915–1452%0.04
infernoA1811–761%0.02
ancientC125–742%0.03
mirageC125–742%-0.02
cacheB84–450%-0.00
nukeA74–357%0.03
anubisB63–350%0.01
overpass—41–325%0.05
train—32–167%0.02
vertigo—11–0100%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (42% over 12). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

7,136Lifetime kills
1.35K/D · Top 25% of Red band
415Matches
54.9%Match win rate · Top 25% of Red band
54.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Red band
0.0%Shot accuracy
1,383MVPs
111Hours (in match)
585Bombs planted
300Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

966dust2
498inferno
410nuke
173train
95vertigo
13office
2ar_shoots
2ar_baggage

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.8%Headshot accuracy
41.4%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.6%Spray accuracy
73.1%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
567msReaction time
38.1%T opening success
37.0%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
5.5%Flash assists
8.08HE damage / grenade
12.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 38.1268% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

42% win rate across 12 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient7–130.0120%30 Oct →
inferno13–9-0.0130%30 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.057%30 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.077%26 Oct →
cache11–130.0122%26 Oct →
nuke9–30.0212%26 Oct →
inferno9–40.1821%26 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.1022%26 Oct →
anubis7–130.0223%25 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0418%25 Oct →
anubis1–13-0.0719%25 Oct →
mirage7–130.0224%22 Oct →
dust29–130.0418%22 Oct →
dust211–130.0621%22 Oct →
dust24–13-0.028%22 Oct →
ancient16–140.0118%22 Oct →
anubis13–100.0518%20 Oct →
dust213–80.0531%20 Oct →
cache11–13-0.0020%19 Oct →
dust213–80.0213%19 Oct →
ancient9–130.0026%19 Oct →
dust22–130.0325%19 Oct →
cache10–1-0.0110%19 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0712%19 Oct →
ancient16–130.0612%18 Oct →
mirage13–20.0030%18 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0017%18 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0111%18 Oct →
cache13–9-0.0911%5 Oct →
cache2–00.0950%5 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0624%5 Oct →
inferno13–90.0326%5 Oct →
nuke9–30.1219%5 Oct →
inferno9–20.058%5 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0617%4 Oct →
inferno13–40.0312%4 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0413%4 Oct →
mirage13–40.0438%3 Oct →
ancient8–130.0016%3 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0631%1 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0630%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0225%30 Sept →
inferno1–13-0.0313%30 Sept →
inferno9–70.1022%28 Sept →
inferno8–80.0921%28 Sept →
nuke6–90.0114%28 Sept →
nuke8–80.1256%28 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0313%28 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0111%25 Sept →
dust216–12-0.0326%25 Sept →
mirage15–150.0024%25 Sept →
vertigo13–11-0.0125%24 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0215%24 Sept →
anubis14–160.0020%23 Sept →
mirage13–90.0227%23 Sept →
dust213–80.1134%23 Sept →
dust213–70.0723%23 Sept →
inferno0–2-0.010%22 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0121%22 Sept →
cache13–10.0329%22 Sept →
mirage13–5-0.0015%22 Sept →
ancient13–60.0420%21 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.049%19 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0614%19 Sept →
dust213–80.1621%18 Sept →
dust213–100.0628%18 Sept →
ancient13–60.1420%17 Sept →
inferno13–80.0436%16 Sept →
dust26–130.0213%31 Aug →
train13–30.0324%13 Jul →
train13–70.0533%13 Jul →
dust28–130.0826%13 Jul →
dust27–130.0529%13 Apr →
inferno13–11-0.0613%13 Apr →
dust213–00.0129%13 Apr →
anubis13–110.0512%19 Feb →
dust213–40.199%19 Feb →
dust22–130.1714%18 Feb →
inferno1–130.0143%23 Dec →
dust213–10-0.0320%23 Dec →
overpass10–130.0511%23 Dec →
ancient5–13-0.0224%23 Dec →
ancient7–130.0822%23 Dec →
train6–13-0.0414%18 Dec →
ancient13–30.0429%18 Dec →
overpass11–130.0520%18 Dec →
dust212–10.0920%18 Dec →
ancient6–13-0.0418%4 Dec →
overpass13–20.0931%4 Dec →
nuke13–70.0422%4 Dec →
dust25–13-0.0313%4 Dec →
dust214–160.0123%2 Dec →
nuke4–13-0.0713%2 Dec →
inferno15–15-0.0319%2 Dec →
mirage7–13-0.0217%2 Dec →
overpass10–130.0119%1 Dec →
dust210–130.1320%1 Dec →
dust213–50.1020%1 Dec →
inferno13–50.0418%1 Dec →
anubis13–20.0330%4 Nov →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.