Amazing_Venox

Amazing_Venox — CS2 Stats

DE76561197998172154[U:1:37906426]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

6,081Tracked matches47%Win rate2021Tracked since
11,146Hours in CS86Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.3 DevelopingPositional Player
Premier CS Rating11,778Blue band · top ~45.5% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 4 · 805 ELOTop 81.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 25 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 11,778 -1,022 23 Aug – 25 Oct · 24 days played
10,70614,086peak 14,08623 Aug25 Oct
14,395Peak Premier in tracked matches
805Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
33Days played since 2026-08-23

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 805
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 — 96 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2

Premier CS Rating

  • 2,308 below peak (14,086)
  • -603 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 3,222 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 4 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,630), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 4 medianLevel 5 medianvs Level 5
Headshot rate45.3%42.7%43.8%above
Shot accuracy9.6%11.2%12.0%2.4% short
Kill/death ratio0.810.991.020.21 short
Match win rate43.0%43.9%44.7%1.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 5 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Kill/death ratio. That is the metric furthest from the Level 5 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGAmazing_VenoxFACEITLevel 4 · 805 ELOSTANDINGTop 81.0% of rankedPREMIER11,778 · Blue bandPEAK ELO805csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim54
Positioning49
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY41–54–5Last 10041%Win rateWWLLLLLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · −2.0pp headshot accuracy · −120ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 581ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.7 against its own average).

Aim5.4
Utility2.6
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch3.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 585ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.4
Positioning4.9
Utility2.6
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact3.9

Composite 4.3/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time591ms+14ms
first ⅓ avg 578ms → last ⅓ avg 591ms
Headshot accuracy21.9%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.3% → last ⅓ avg 21.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–1 · dust2, 24 Aug →
43%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · nuke, 25 Oct →
328msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · nuke, 25 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 8 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
5–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 63% over 16mirageWeakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB2411–1346%-0.01
dust2D227–1532%-0.01
ancientA1610–663%-0.00
nukeC146–843%-0.01
anubisD113–827%-0.02
mirageD92–722%-0.03
cache—32–167%0.02
overpass—10–10%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

167,474Lifetime kills
0.81K/D
10,289Matches
43.0%Match win rate
45.3%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 4 players
9.6%Shot accuracy
19,373MVPs
4,292Hours (in match)
12,912Bombs planted
2,032Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4739,328
AWP19,427
MP74,740
P904,113
FAMAS3,849

Lifetime map wins

27,001dust2
23,442inferno
15,868nuke
3,046vertigo
1,054train
261cbble
154office
81lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,938Matches
50%Win rate
0.86Avg K/D
74.0ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
16%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust242447%0.8914.1
Inferno39853%0.8813.6
Ancient26349%0.8714.3
Nuke19951%0.8313.6
Anubis19751%0.8313.2
Mirage17746%0.8512.8
Vertigo7356%0.9313.7
Overpass3951%0.7812.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.1%Headshot accuracy
28.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
27.7%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
9.9°Preaim
585msReaction time
36.3%T opening success
50.8%CT opening success
0.33Enemies flashed / flash
0.9%Flash assists
10.35HE damage / grenade
2.02Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.326 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 36.3025% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno16–13-0.0616%26 Oct →
inferno13–20.0115%26 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0715%25 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0513%25 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0543%25 Oct →
anubis12–16-0.0321%25 Oct →
dust210–13-0.0512%25 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0525%23 Oct →
inferno13–100.0116%23 Oct →
inferno13–80.0515%23 Oct →
cache13–20.0427%23 Oct →
nuke7–4-0.0414%23 Oct →
overpass8–130.0017%23 Oct →
inferno5–90.0025%22 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0617%22 Oct →
dust22–130.0119%22 Oct →
anubis13–11-0.0120%18 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0825%12 Oct →
nuke13–4-0.103%12 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0143%12 Oct →
inferno13–3-0.0228%12 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0118%11 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0625%11 Oct →
ancient13–40.0123%11 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.0320%11 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0337%11 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0511%11 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0243%11 Oct →
inferno13–90.0133%9 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0414%8 Oct →
ancient13–10.0227%8 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0623%8 Oct →
mirage7–130.0219%8 Oct →
cache13–10.026%8 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.0719%7 Oct →
anubis13–50.0615%7 Oct →
nuke5–00.1220%7 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0716%7 Oct →
dust28–130.0525%7 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0321%7 Oct →
mirage12–16-0.0514%6 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0115%4 Oct →
inferno13–50.0727%4 Oct →
mirage16–140.0119%3 Oct →
dust29–13-0.0019%3 Oct →
nuke7–13-0.065%3 Oct →
ancient13–100.0721%2 Oct →
inferno6–130.0134%30 Sept →
ancient16–130.0114%30 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0017%29 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0426%29 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0420%29 Sept →
mirage15–15-0.0513%28 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0218%24 Sept →
ancient13–110.0411%24 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0817%23 Sept →
cache12–16-0.0020%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0721%23 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0223%23 Sept →
ancient7–13-0.0315%23 Sept →
inferno14–16-0.0412%22 Sept →
ancient13–50.0418%22 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0725%21 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0526%21 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0527%21 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.0512%21 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0214%20 Sept →
nuke15–150.0314%20 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0411%17 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0324%17 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.039%17 Sept →
dust215–15-0.0324%16 Sept →
inferno13–1-0.0122%16 Sept →
dust27–13-0.048%14 Sept →
ancient9–13-0.0313%7 Sept →
dust24–130.0614%7 Sept →
ancient13–60.0622%7 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0519%7 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.039%7 Sept →
dust213–110.0626%7 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0216%6 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0817%6 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0313%6 Sept →
mirage13–100.1020%6 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0226%3 Sept →
nuke13–50.0618%27 Aug →
anubis13–8-0.0212%27 Aug →
dust213–10-0.0122%26 Aug →
inferno13–70.0529%26 Aug →
anubis3–13-0.0517%26 Aug →
nuke13–10.0012%25 Aug →
dust213–3-0.0015%25 Aug →
nuke11–130.0024%24 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0412%24 Aug →
dust213–10.1337%24 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0110%24 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0120%23 Aug →
nuke13–60.0323%23 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0025%23 Aug →
dust213–70.0221%23 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.