Geldberg

Geldberg — CS2 Stats

DE76561198106134431[U:1:145868703]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,064Tracked matches62%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,564Hours in CS105Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating16,709Purple band · top ~21.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 9 · 1,274 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 30 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,709 +2,024 30 Aug – 30 Sept · 11 days played
14,68518,206peak 18,20630 Aug30 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,274 +0 30 Aug – 24 Sept · 5 observations
1,2741,274peak 1,27430 Aug24 Sept
18,206Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,274Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
10Days played since 2026-08-30

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,274
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 — 77 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,497 below peak (18,206)
  • +1,710 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 3,291 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-20
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches58——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.53——
Headshot %66%——

Measured 24 Sep 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches332——
Win rate50%——
K/D1.09——
Headshot %63%——

Measured 31 Aug 2026 → 1 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,327), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate49.9%48.2%50.9%1.0% short
Shot accuracy8.1%13.3%13.8%5.6% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.071.090.13 short
Match win rate38.0%46.9%48.4%10.4% short

This profile sits below the typical Level 10 player on every metric we can compare.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGGeldbergFACEITLevel 9 · 1,274 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPREMIER16,709 · Purple band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,274csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning78
Utility26

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY53–46–1Last 10053%Win rateWLLWWWWTLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +112ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 10

  • 5–4–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 586ms

Last 20

  • 10–9–1 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 530ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility2.6
Positioning7.8
Opening Duels6.7
Clutch2.8

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 61% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 64% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 556ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning7.8
Utility2.6
Mechanics5.3
Opening Duels8.1
Win Impact9.0

Composite 6.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.03
Reaction time557ms+17ms
first ⅓ avg 540ms → last ⅓ avg 557ms
Headshot accuracy20.1%−3.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.1% → last ⅓ avg 20.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 13–4 · mirage, 27 Sept →
47%Best headshot accuracy · 13–1 · nuke, 21 Sept →
344msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 24 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
6–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 70% over 20infernoWeakest map · 39% over 31
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC3112–1939%0.01
dust2A2212–1055%0.02
ancientS2014–670%0.03
nukeB126–650%0.03
mirageA95–456%0.05
cache—43–175%-0.02
anubis—21–150%0.10

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (39% over 31). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

71,567Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
3,377Matches
38.0%Match win rate
49.9%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players
8.1%Shot accuracy
6,077MVPs
1,323Hours (in match)
3,577Bombs planted
712Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4724,533
XM10143,968
AWP3,869
AUG3,700
MP72,111
SG 5531,671

Lifetime map wins

8,865dust2
4,423inferno
2,484nuke
183office
153train
109cbble
67vertigo
62lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

861Matches
50%Win rate
1.04Avg K/D
77.8ADR
52%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

34%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient21552%1.0715.9
Inferno19853%0.9815.3
Dust215051%1.1715.8
Nuke10550%1.0516.1
Mirage5439%1.0614.7
Overpass4755%1.0215.7
Cache4238%0.9615.9
Anubis4245%0.8313.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

19.9%Headshot accuracy
39.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
43.3%Spray accuracy
73.8%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
556msReaction time
63.6%T opening success
61.1%CT opening success
0.25Enemies flashed / flash
1.3%Flash assists
8.19HE damage / grenade
4.13Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.2482 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

39% win rate across 31 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno25–220.0118%1 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0519%30 Sept →
nuke7–130.0416%30 Sept →
anubis13–20.1621%30 Sept →
nuke13–70.1320%30 Sept →
dust24–20.0525%30 Sept →
ancient13–20.1614%30 Sept →
dust212–120.1325%30 Sept →
ancient5–12-0.0313%30 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0220%30 Sept →
inferno7–90.0215%30 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0014%29 Sept →
anubis11–130.0512%29 Sept →
ancient13–110.0020%28 Sept →
nuke7–130.0726%28 Sept →
dust213–70.0225%28 Sept →
inferno14–160.0111%28 Sept →
inferno13–90.0121%28 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.0118%28 Sept →
ancient13–10.0111%27 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0126%27 Sept →
ancient13–110.0528%27 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0425%27 Sept →
nuke13–8-0.0131%27 Sept →
cache13–60.0322%27 Sept →
inferno9–130.0116%27 Sept →
mirage13–40.1621%27 Sept →
ancient8–13-0.0124%27 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0024%27 Sept →
ancient13–10.0113%24 Sept →
nuke13–20.0918%24 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0224%24 Sept →
ancient13–100.0526%24 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.0215%24 Sept →
inferno13–60.0119%24 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.039%24 Sept →
dust28–00.0138%24 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0121%24 Sept →
inferno8–130.0221%24 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0315%24 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0526%24 Sept →
nuke10–130.0413%24 Sept →
ancient13–70.0721%24 Sept →
dust213–100.0318%24 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0710%24 Sept →
ancient13–11-0.0013%24 Sept →
mirage9–13-0.0115%24 Sept →
inferno4–13-0.0221%24 Sept →
nuke13–11-0.0026%24 Sept →
nuke10–130.0620%24 Sept →
nuke2–13-0.0210%24 Sept →
inferno12–160.0416%23 Sept →
dust213–100.0829%23 Sept →
mirage10–130.0323%23 Sept →
inferno6–130.0028%23 Sept →
dust213–90.0416%23 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0215%23 Sept →
ancient13–80.1023%23 Sept →
ancient13–100.0731%23 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0123%23 Sept →
ancient13–160.0513%23 Sept →
inferno13–80.0315%23 Sept →
ancient7–130.0210%23 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0321%23 Sept →
inferno7–9-0.0716%23 Sept →
inferno9–40.1427%23 Sept →
inferno9–50.0426%23 Sept →
dust213–40.0716%23 Sept →
mirage13–40.1214%23 Sept →
dust210–130.0427%23 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0013%22 Sept →
ancient11–130.0218%22 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0424%22 Sept →
dust213–5-0.0221%22 Sept →
inferno13–16-0.0312%22 Sept →
ancient13–10.0726%22 Sept →
inferno10–130.0325%22 Sept →
dust210–130.0532%22 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.0510%22 Sept →
dust25–130.0323%22 Sept →
dust216–13-0.0222%22 Sept →
inferno6–130.1122%21 Sept →
dust27–13-0.0121%21 Sept →
mirage13–60.1323%21 Sept →
mirage13–20.1030%21 Sept →
mirage13–6-0.0126%21 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0127%21 Sept →
inferno13–80.0428%21 Sept →
dust214–16-0.0021%21 Sept →
ancient13–70.0025%21 Sept →
inferno11–130.0124%21 Sept →
nuke13–80.0421%21 Sept →
inferno13–20.1018%21 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0616%21 Sept →
ancient13–110.0826%21 Sept →
dust213–60.0421%21 Sept →
inferno13–4-0.0524%21 Sept →
nuke13–10.0147%21 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0135%21 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0425%20 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.