Junior262133

Junior262133 — CS2 Stats

US76561197998080570[U:1:37814842]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,401Tracked matches36%Win rate2020Tracked since
9,470Hours in CS24Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.2 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating22,060Top 50% of 204,150 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~6.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#53341 of 251263 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,702 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Oct 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,060 -2,884 19 Aug – 9 Oct · 24 days played
21,29326,165peak 26,16519 Aug9 Oct
26,165Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,702Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
25Days played since 2026-08-19

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,702
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 49 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-03
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-03

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,105 below peak (26,165)
  • -2,990 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,940 to go
  • Reached: Red band · Pink band · Purple band · Blue band
  • Red band first seen 2026-09-03
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-03

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=14,773), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate46.4%46.8%48.2%1.8% short
Shot accuracy15.0%13.0%13.3%above
Kill/death ratio1.081.061.07meets
Match win rate47.2%46.3%46.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGJunior262133FACEITLevel 8 · 1,702 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,060 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,702csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81
Positioning48
Utility77

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD52–46–2Last 10052%Win rateLWWWLLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +6.4pp headshot accuracy · −57ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 588ms

Last 20

  • 6–13–1 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 616ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.8 against its own average).

Aim8.1
Utility7.7
Positioning4.8
Opening Duels2.2
Clutch5.0

Excellent counter-strafingHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 85% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 77 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 13.0° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 32 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Reaction time. 612ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1
Positioning4.8
Utility7.7
Mechanics8.6
Opening Duels2.2
Win Impact0.2

Composite 6.2/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time620ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 601ms → last ⅓ avg 620ms
Headshot accuracy28.8%+6.9%
first ⅓ avg 21.9% → last ⅓ avg 28.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.16Best match rating · 5–0 · nuke, 14 Sept →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–4 · ancient, 30 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 7 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 24 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

9Longest win streak
8–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 72% over 18anubisWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2113–862%0.01
mirageC198–1142%0.00
ancientS1813–572%0.03
dust2B136–746%-0.03
nukeC114–736%0.02
cacheA106–460%0.00
anubisD72–529%-0.03
train—10–10%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

276,762Lifetime kills
1.08K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
12,321Matches
47.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 8 players
46.4%Headshot %
15.0%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
34,106MVPs
5,743Hours (in match)
17,744Bombs planted
3,690Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4781,427
AWP21,136
P25018,519
MP913,213
Glock-1810,745
MAC-1010,544

Lifetime map wins

24,432inferno
18,813dust2
11,975nuke
5,314vertigo
4,823train
1,840cbble
296office
72aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

303Matches
57%Win rate
1.09Avg K/D
86.2ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

45%1v1 clutch win
37%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage3554%0.9814.3
Dust23060%1.0517.7
Inferno1242%1.0015.9
Ancient1242%1.2118.3
Overpass967%1.3318.8
Train475%0.7813.0
Anubis450%1.1619.3
Nuke367%1.2016.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

29.1%Headshot accuracy
36.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
39.7%Spray accuracy
88.7%Counter-strafing
13.0°Preaim
612msReaction time
36.6%T opening success
41.0%CT opening success
0.55Enemies flashed / flash
12.7%Flash assists
7.10HE damage / grenade
20.14Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 12.9946° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage5–13-0.0637%9 Oct →
mirage16–13-0.0618%9 Oct →
ancient13–50.0723%9 Oct →
inferno13–30.1230%9 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.009%8 Oct →
nuke8–13-0.0328%8 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.1030%7 Oct →
mirage13–160.0136%5 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0638%5 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0038%5 Oct →
ancient9–13-0.0425%3 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0327%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0927%3 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.1017%3 Oct →
cache13–40.0620%3 Oct →
nuke15–150.0224%3 Oct →
ancient13–9-0.0022%2 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0329%2 Oct →
dust213–70.0312%2 Oct →
anubis10–130.0121%1 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0230%1 Oct →
nuke5–13-0.0338%30 Sept →
train12–12-0.0336%30 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0737%30 Sept →
inferno13–40.0756%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0536%30 Sept →
ancient13–40.0458%30 Sept →
mirage13–70.1216%30 Sept →
inferno11–130.0233%29 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.0337%28 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.0824%28 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0719%28 Sept →
ancient13–10.1023%24 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0221%24 Sept →
mirage11–130.0226%24 Sept →
anubis11–130.0217%24 Sept →
dust213–110.0219%24 Sept →
mirage5–130.0143%24 Sept →
cache13–11-0.0417%24 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.0326%24 Sept →
nuke13–90.0325%21 Sept →
mirage16–14-0.0233%21 Sept →
cache13–70.0144%20 Sept →
inferno13–100.0129%20 Sept →
mirage9–130.0230%19 Sept →
ancient1–13-0.1029%19 Sept →
dust213–40.0715%19 Sept →
nuke4–13-0.0233%19 Sept →
dust29–130.0122%19 Sept →
inferno13–110.0327%19 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0422%19 Sept →
inferno5–130.0238%18 Sept →
inferno13–40.1323%18 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.0524%17 Sept →
inferno13–20.0534%17 Sept →
inferno13–80.0032%17 Sept →
inferno13–30.0421%17 Sept →
cache13–8-0.0124%16 Sept →
ancient13–10-0.0324%16 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0721%16 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0622%16 Sept →
ancient9–130.0026%16 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.0416%15 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0124%15 Sept →
ancient13–110.0213%15 Sept →
inferno13–70.0526%15 Sept →
mirage12–16-0.0216%15 Sept →
nuke13–70.0221%15 Sept →
cache13–9-0.0317%15 Sept →
dust211–13-0.0220%14 Sept →
inferno8–130.0024%14 Sept →
nuke5–00.1622%14 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0521%14 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0113%14 Sept →
ancient13–80.0214%14 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0131%14 Sept →
nuke9–130.0124%13 Sept →
cache11–130.0229%13 Sept →
mirage13–100.0830%13 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0321%13 Sept →
mirage8–3-0.068%13 Sept →
ancient9–130.0132%13 Sept →
mirage11–130.0128%13 Sept →
ancient13–40.0520%13 Sept →
nuke5–13-0.0231%12 Sept →
inferno6–130.0314%12 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0216%12 Sept →
inferno8–13-0.0030%10 Sept →
nuke16–120.0626%10 Sept →
dust28–130.0214%10 Sept →
cache5–13-0.0314%10 Sept →
mirage13–100.1220%31 Aug →
dust22–13-0.0823%31 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0120%20 Aug →
mirage13–70.0322%20 Aug →
ancient10–130.1227%20 Aug →
cache13–70.0319%20 Aug →
ancient13–90.1126%19 Aug →
inferno16–14-0.0323%19 Aug →
ancient13–20.1323%19 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.