Ol'Bertha R.I.P Ol'Bertha — CS2 Stats

76561197997691205[U:1:37425477]

559Tracked matches45%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,406Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.2 Developing
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOl'Bertha R.I.P Ol'BerthaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim52
Positioning37
Utility27

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY44488Last 10044%Win rateWLLWLWLTWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: -10pp win rate · -0.00 avg rating

Player DNA

Aim5.2
Aggression3.6
Utility2.7
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels1.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 76% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, opening-fight frequency.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 43% on CT to 26% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 663ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.2
Positioning3.7
Utility2.7
Mechanics6.6
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact3.3

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time655ms−5ms
first ⅓ avg 660ms → last ⅓ avg 655ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+3.6%
first ⅓ avg 13.0% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.23Best rating — eldorado 9–1
131Biggest win — mirage
6Longest win streak
54In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 71% over 7nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC2391439%-0.03
dust2C2391439%-0.04
ancientB136746%-0.03
overpassC94544%-0.04
anubisS75271%-0.03
nukeD72529%-0.02
eldoradoC52340%-0.03
cacheA53260%-0.04
inferno32167%-0.08
debris31233%-0.06
poseidon110100%-0.02
sanctum1010%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

37,960Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
2,707Matches
35.6%Match win rate
34.8%Headshot %
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of tracked players
3,262MVPs
1,406Hours (in match)
1,493Bombs planted
303Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

10,318dust2
1,385inferno
1,005nuke
407vertigo
131train
47cbble
33lake
21stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

260Matches
50%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

1v1 clutch win
1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.9%Headshot accuracy
32.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
79.7%Counter-strafing
10.6°Preaim
663msReaction time
25.9%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.41Enemies flashed / flash
3.3%Flash assists
4.68HE damage / grenade
3.43Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.407 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 25.9223% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategyNuke grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno9–4-0.0910%15 Aug
eldorado3–9-0.1713%15 Aug
debris3–8-0.0214%3 Aug
cache13–8-0.093%1 Aug
mirage4–13-0.0619%1 Aug
eldorado9–10.2324%26 Jul
eldorado4–9-0.1422%26 Jul
debris8–8-0.0825%26 Jul
eldorado9–20.1036%14 Jul
eldorado6–9-0.1411%14 Jul
debris9–7-0.098%14 Jul
ancient13–5-0.0617%8 Jul
dust211–13-0.0624%8 Jul
cache13–11-0.0312%3 Jul
dust213–7-0.0117%3 Jul
dust212–120.0419%30 Jun
ancient0–4-0.050%30 Jun
overpass13–7-0.0322%22 Jun
dust28–13-0.0318%21 Jun
mirage4–13-0.1113%6 Jun
dust211–13-0.0411%6 Jun
poseidon9–4-0.0220%6 Jun
cache13–10-0.0419%5 Jun
ancient5–13-0.0418%2 Jun
dust26–13-0.0727%5 May
ancient10–13-0.0011%5 May
cache11–130.0111%1 May
cache7–13-0.077%1 May
mirage13–8-0.0223%16 Apr
overpass10–13-0.0412%16 Apr
dust210–13-0.1010%16 Apr
anubis13–6-0.0736%14 Apr
mirage13–60.0119%10 Apr
dust213–11-0.079%4 Apr
mirage9–13-0.0416%4 Apr
dust213–2-0.0314%4 Apr
nuke13–3-0.0612%27 Mar
anubis5–13-0.0621%27 Mar
ancient8–13-0.0710%27 Mar
dust213–7-0.0321%27 Mar
ancient5–13-0.0425%25 Mar
overpass4–13-0.0514%24 Mar
nuke7–130.0116%24 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0115%21 Mar
overpass7–13-0.1117%20 Mar
mirage13–8-0.0416%14 Mar
overpass12–12-0.0424%14 Mar
mirage12–12-0.0425%14 Mar
dust28–13-0.0811%12 Mar
ancient13–110.0415%10 Mar
nuke8–13-0.0415%9 Mar
anubis13–5-0.0118%6 Mar
ancient13–8-0.0713%4 Mar
mirage13–80.009%3 Mar
mirage13–8-0.039%3 Mar
overpass11–13-0.0510%28 Feb
dust213–6-0.0520%28 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0213%28 Feb
mirage9–13-0.0811%28 Feb
overpass13–8-0.083%28 Feb
dust213–10-0.0016%26 Feb
overpass13–9-0.0013%24 Feb
anubis8–13-0.0327%24 Feb
ancient13–6-0.0112%24 Feb
mirage7–13-0.0919%24 Feb
dust29–13-0.0817%24 Feb
mirage12–12-0.0310%23 Feb
ancient12–12-0.069%22 Feb
mirage13–1-0.037%22 Feb
dust24–13-0.0727%21 Feb
overpass13–100.0117%19 Feb
ancient13–40.0916%19 Feb
mirage5–13-0.0711%19 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0114%19 Feb
mirage13–90.0327%18 Feb
dust213–10.0228%18 Feb
nuke12–120.0211%17 Feb
inferno5–9-0.100%17 Feb
mirage13–50.0415%14 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0210%10 Feb
mirage9–130.0213%10 Feb
nuke6–13-0.030%10 Feb
dust26–13-0.077%10 Feb
dust213–4-0.0120%9 Feb
anubis13–8-0.0516%7 Feb
mirage8–13-0.079%6 Feb
mirage12–12-0.0414%6 Feb
dust22–13-0.056%6 Feb
nuke13–10-0.0314%6 Feb
ancient13–11-0.0217%6 Feb
anubis13–5-0.0221%6 Feb
inferno9–6-0.0414%6 Feb
anubis13–40.0219%5 Feb
dust213–10-0.0311%5 Feb
sanctum3–9-0.1213%4 Feb
dust23–13-0.066%3 Feb
dust27–13-0.0415%3 Feb
mirage3–13-0.089%2 Feb
ancient1–13-0.130%2 Feb
dust27–13-0.0714%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →