Ol'Bertha R.I.P Ol'Bertha

Ol'Bertha R.I.P Ol'Bertha — CS2 Stats

US76561197997691205[U:1:37425477]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

564Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
1,408Hours in CS
CSDB Rating4.1 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 28 Aug 2026 (47 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

+5Tracked matches · now 564
−2.0ppWin rate · 44.8% → 42.9%

Rating over time

50Days played since 2026-02-04

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches9——
Win rate56%——
K/D0.59——
Headshot %39%——

Measured 12 Sep 2026 → 14 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,051), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate34.8%41.8%42.7%7.9% short
Shot accuracy16.3%12.2%11.3%above
Kill/death ratio0.920.980.990.07 short
Match win rate35.7%43.3%43.9%8.2% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGOl'Bertha R.I.P Ol'BerthaFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim51
Positioning37
Utility29

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY46–45–9Last 10046%Win rateTWLLWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · −0.04 avg rating · −4.0pp headshot accuracy · −33ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 580ms

Last 10

  • 4–5–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.07
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 608ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.05
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 624ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.1
Utility2.9
Positioning3.7
Opening Duels1.4

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 93% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 44% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 643ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.1
Positioning3.7
Utility2.9
Mechanics6.4
Opening Duels1.7
Win Impact2.6

Composite 4.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.04−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.03 → last ⅓ avg -0.04
Reaction time651ms−6ms
first ⅓ avg 657ms → last ⅓ avg 651ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 9–1 · eldorado, 26 Jul →
36%Best headshot accuracy · 9–2 · eldorado, 14 Jul →
453msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · cache, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · mirage, 22 Feb →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 75% over 8nukeWeakest map · 29% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageC239–1439%-0.03
dust2B2210–1245%-0.04
ancientB126–650%-0.02
overpassC94–544%-0.04
anubisS86–275%-0.03
nukeD72–529%-0.02
cacheB63–350%-0.05
eldoradoC52–340%-0.03
inferno—32–167%-0.08
debris—31–233%-0.06
poseidon—11–0100%-0.02
sanctum—10–10%-0.12

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Nuke is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (29% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Nuke lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

38,026Lifetime kills
0.92K/D
2,716Matches
35.7%Match win rate
34.8%Headshot %
16.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 3 players
3,268MVPs
1,408Hours (in match)
1,495Bombs planted
303Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

10,337dust2
1,385inferno
1,005nuke
407vertigo
131train
47cbble
33lake
21stmarc

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

260Matches
50%Win rate
0.74Avg K/D
—ADR
37%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
30.6%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.2%Spray accuracy
78.9%Counter-strafing
10.8°Preaim
643msReaction time
26.6%T opening success
43.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
4.1%Flash assists
4.17HE damage / grenade
3.48Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4598 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 26.6317% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Nuke

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

29% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Nuke callouts & strategy →Nuke grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage12–12-0.0419%5 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0811%5 Oct →
cache6–13-0.1133%27 Sept →
dust26–13-0.0423%27 Sept →
anubis13–2-0.0012%15 Sept →
inferno9–4-0.0910%15 Aug →
eldorado3–9-0.1713%15 Aug →
debris3–8-0.0214%3 Aug →
cache13–8-0.093%1 Aug →
mirage4–13-0.0619%1 Aug →
eldorado9–10.2324%26 Jul →
eldorado4–9-0.1422%26 Jul →
debris8–8-0.0825%26 Jul →
eldorado9–20.1036%14 Jul →
eldorado6–9-0.1411%14 Jul →
debris9–7-0.098%14 Jul →
ancient13–5-0.0617%8 Jul →
dust211–13-0.0624%8 Jul →
cache13–11-0.0312%3 Jul →
dust213–7-0.0117%3 Jul →
dust212–120.0419%30 Jun →
ancient0–4-0.050%30 Jun →
overpass13–7-0.0322%22 Jun →
dust28–13-0.0318%21 Jun →
mirage4–13-0.1113%6 Jun →
dust211–13-0.0411%6 Jun →
poseidon9–4-0.0220%6 Jun →
cache13–10-0.0419%5 Jun →
ancient5–13-0.0418%2 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0727%5 May →
ancient10–13-0.0011%5 May →
cache11–130.0111%1 May →
cache7–13-0.077%1 May →
mirage13–8-0.0223%16 Apr →
overpass10–13-0.0412%16 Apr →
dust210–13-0.1010%16 Apr →
anubis13–6-0.0736%14 Apr →
mirage13–60.0119%10 Apr →
dust213–11-0.079%4 Apr →
mirage9–13-0.0416%4 Apr →
dust213–2-0.0314%4 Apr →
nuke13–3-0.0612%27 Mar →
anubis5–13-0.0621%27 Mar →
ancient8–13-0.0710%27 Mar →
dust213–7-0.0321%27 Mar →
ancient5–13-0.0425%25 Mar →
overpass4–13-0.0514%24 Mar →
nuke7–130.0116%24 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0115%21 Mar →
overpass7–13-0.1117%20 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.0416%14 Mar →
overpass12–12-0.0424%14 Mar →
mirage12–12-0.0425%14 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0811%12 Mar →
ancient13–110.0415%10 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.0415%9 Mar →
anubis13–5-0.0118%6 Mar →
ancient13–8-0.0713%4 Mar →
mirage13–80.009%3 Mar →
mirage13–8-0.039%3 Mar →
overpass11–13-0.0510%28 Feb →
dust213–6-0.0520%28 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0213%28 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0811%28 Feb →
overpass13–8-0.083%28 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0016%26 Feb →
overpass13–9-0.0013%24 Feb →
anubis8–13-0.0327%24 Feb →
ancient13–6-0.0112%24 Feb →
mirage7–13-0.0919%24 Feb →
dust29–13-0.0817%24 Feb →
mirage12–12-0.0310%23 Feb →
ancient12–12-0.069%22 Feb →
mirage13–1-0.037%22 Feb →
dust24–13-0.0727%21 Feb →
overpass13–100.0117%19 Feb →
ancient13–40.0916%19 Feb →
mirage5–13-0.0711%19 Feb →
mirage6–13-0.0114%19 Feb →
mirage13–90.0327%18 Feb →
dust213–10.0228%18 Feb →
nuke12–120.0211%17 Feb →
inferno5–9-0.100%17 Feb →
mirage13–50.0415%14 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.0210%10 Feb →
mirage9–130.0213%10 Feb →
nuke6–13-0.030%10 Feb →
dust26–13-0.077%10 Feb →
dust213–4-0.0120%9 Feb →
anubis13–8-0.0516%7 Feb →
mirage8–13-0.079%6 Feb →
mirage12–12-0.0414%6 Feb →
dust22–13-0.056%6 Feb →
nuke13–10-0.0314%6 Feb →
ancient13–11-0.0217%6 Feb →
anubis13–5-0.0221%6 Feb →
inferno9–6-0.0414%6 Feb →
anubis13–40.0219%5 Feb →
dust213–10-0.0311%5 Feb →
sanctum3–9-0.1213%4 Feb →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.