sup0r #thugbirdz

sup0r #thugbirdz — CS2 Stats

FI76561197994321357[U:1:34055629]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,611Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,597Hours in CS27Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating5.1 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating19,428Top 50% of 204,793 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~10.8% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#90819 of 252099 tracked
FaceitLevel 6Top 54.0% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 10 Oct 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,428 +4,924 28 Jul – 10 Oct · 33 days played
13,85920,000peak 20,00028 Jul10 Oct
20,118Peak Premier in tracked matches
40Days played since 2026-07-28

Premier CS Rating

  • 572 below peak (20,000)
  • +3,912 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 572 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 6 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,110), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 6 medianLevel 7 medianvs Level 7
Headshot rate37.1%44.8%45.7%8.6% short
Shot accuracy9.8%12.4%12.7%2.9% short
Kill/death ratio0.951.031.050.10 short
Match win rate48.8%45.2%45.7%above

This profile matches the typical Level 7 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 7 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGsup0r #thugbirdzFACEITLevel 6STANDINGTop 54.0% of rankedPREMIER19,428 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim47
Positioning54
Utility76

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY55–43–2Last 10055%Win rateLWWWWLLLLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −6.5pp headshot accuracy · −0ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 497ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 484ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.2 against its own average).

Aim4.7
Utility7.6
Positioning5.4
Opening Duels0.5
Clutch4.2

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 56% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Utility. Utility score of 76 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 48% on T to 29% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Counter-strafing. Only 61% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim4.7
Positioning5.4
Utility7.6
Mechanics2.4
Opening Duels2.3
Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.1/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time484ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 530ms → last ⅓ avg 484ms
Headshot accuracy18.9%+1.3%
first ⅓ avg 17.6% → last ⅓ avg 18.9%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–0 · anubis, 11 Aug →
100%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · inferno, 3 Sept →
313msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 25 Sept →
13–0Biggest win · anubis, 11 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
9–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 70% over 20ancientWeakest map · 45% over 20
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeS2014–670%0.01
infernoB2010–1050%0.01
ancientB209–1145%0.00
anubisA1811–761%0.01
cacheB179–853%-0.01
mirage—31–233%-0.00
dust2—21–150%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (45% over 20). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

89,858Lifetime kills
0.95K/D
5,239Matches
48.8%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 6 players
37.1%Headshot %
9.8%Shot accuracy
11,271MVPs
2,237Hours (in match)
6,159Bombs planted
1,125Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

XM101437,219
AK-479,661
Nova4,103
P903,474
Tec-92,465
AWP2,455

Lifetime map wins

9,836inferno
4,481nuke
2,071cbble
1,299train
1,285dust2
579vertigo
283bank
274lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

929Matches
47%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
89.4ADR
44%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis22250%1.1116.9
Inferno19749%1.0715.7
Ancient17347%1.1416.4
Nuke16950%1.0215.5
Train3842%0.9915.2
Mirage3537%1.0215.3
Vertigo2642%1.0215.7
Dust22528%0.9215.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
28.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
40.1%Spray accuracy
61.0%Counter-strafing
13.2°Preaim
484msReaction time
48.4%T opening success
28.9%CT opening success
0.71Enemies flashed / flash
7.2%Flash assists
10.86HE damage / grenade
12.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Your crosshair sits further from where enemies appear than it needs to. Crosshair placement is the cheapest accuracy you can buy.

    Preaim 13.2389° — above the 12° mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

45% win rate across 20 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache11–13-0.0017%13 Oct →
anubis13–70.0410%10 Oct →
anubis13–10.0813%10 Oct →
nuke13–90.057%10 Oct →
cache13–10-0.0129%10 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0414%9 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.050%7 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0633%4 Oct →
mirage10–130.0213%3 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0520%3 Oct →
cache8–13-0.0625%2 Oct →
inferno13–80.0414%2 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0722%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.020%1 Oct →
anubis7–130.0833%30 Sept →
dust21–13-0.060%25 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0340%25 Sept →
cache13–10-0.0233%25 Sept →
dust213–90.0227%24 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0025%24 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0311%19 Sept →
ancient6–130.0713%19 Sept →
nuke13–50.0167%19 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.070%17 Sept →
inferno13–90.040%17 Sept →
inferno13–90.027%17 Sept →
cache13–6-0.030%15 Sept →
anubis13–110.038%12 Sept →
nuke13–40.0250%12 Sept →
nuke13–6-0.0225%12 Sept →
nuke13–50.1033%12 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.0033%12 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.090%11 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0740%11 Sept →
inferno13–8-0.0214%11 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.000%11 Sept →
nuke13–20.000%10 Sept →
inferno13–30.078%5 Sept →
anubis13–80.098%5 Sept →
cache10–13-0.0350%3 Sept →
inferno8–130.01100%3 Sept →
ancient15–150.047%3 Sept →
cache13–100.0220%1 Sept →
inferno13–90.0122%28 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.030%27 Aug →
anubis11–130.0025%26 Aug →
cache13–110.05100%25 Aug →
cache13–110.0250%24 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.0233%24 Aug →
ancient13–40.0014%23 Aug →
inferno1–13-0.020%21 Aug →
ancient13–100.050%21 Aug →
anubis13–9-0.040%21 Aug →
inferno8–13-0.0614%21 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0414%21 Aug →
ancient10–130.000%21 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0515%20 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0333%20 Aug →
ancient13–50.027%20 Aug →
ancient13–10-0.0215%20 Aug →
ancient4–13-0.0313%16 Aug →
nuke13–110.0038%16 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.050%14 Aug →
cache8–13-0.0720%13 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.060%13 Aug →
nuke13–6-0.0040%13 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.039%13 Aug →
anubis13–90.059%13 Aug →
nuke13–60.028%12 Aug →
inferno13–90.030%12 Aug →
inferno10–13-0.0217%12 Aug →
inferno13–70.0515%11 Aug →
anubis13–00.1217%11 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.058%11 Aug →
inferno11–130.0225%11 Aug →
ancient13–30.100%11 Aug →
cache4–13-0.0220%11 Aug →
nuke16–120.0538%11 Aug →
ancient13–30.1040%9 Aug →
cache13–20.0733%9 Aug →
anubis13–70.0311%9 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0327%9 Aug →
anubis12–16-0.0358%8 Aug →
inferno5–130.1015%8 Aug →
ancient12–16-0.0340%8 Aug →
ancient13–90.0213%7 Aug →
anubis8–13-0.0125%7 Aug →
nuke8–13-0.0817%7 Aug →
cache7–13-0.050%7 Aug →
ancient13–3-0.000%7 Aug →
mirage16–14-0.0113%7 Aug →
inferno10–130.0230%5 Aug →
anubis9–130.028%5 Aug →
nuke13–10.0825%5 Aug →
cache13–50.0810%2 Aug →
nuke1–6-0.020%30 Jul →
nuke13–11-0.010%30 Jul →
cache13–4-0.0033%30 Jul →
nuke13–70.0713%30 Jul →
ancient15–150.0313%28 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.