mlinkku

mlinkku — CS2 Stats

76561198943027654[U:1:982761926]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,960Tracked matches54%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating13,252Blue band · top ~37.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,171 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian I
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 15 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 13,252 -495 31 Aug – 15 Oct · 31 days played
10,54114,623peak 14,62331 Aug15 Oct
14,822Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,171Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
32Days played since 2026-08-31

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,171
  • Next: Level 6 at 1,201 — 30 to go
  • Reached: Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,371 below peak (14,623)
  • -277 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 1,748 to go
  • Reached: Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGmlinkkuFACEITLevel 5 · 1,171 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER13,252 · Blue bandPEAK ELO1,171csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim66
Positioning74
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateLWTWLTLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · +1.9pp headshot accuracy · +99ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–2–1 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 656ms

Last 10

  • 4–4–2 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 641ms

Last 20

  • 10–8–2 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 592ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2.2 against its own average).

Aim6.6
Utility4.9
Positioning7.4
Opening Duels4.7
Clutch4.0

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 60% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 66% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 594ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 66% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.6
Positioning7.4
Utility4.9
Mechanics3.7
Opening Duels8.3
Win Impact6.2

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time606ms+44ms
first ⅓ avg 562ms → last ⅓ avg 606ms
Headshot accuracy14.3%+1.2%
first ⅓ avg 13.1% → last ⅓ avg 14.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–6 · dust2, 12 Sept →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 1–13 · dust2, 25 Sept →
375msFastest reaction time · 8–13 · anubis, 9 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 10 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
9–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
7Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 60% over 20mirageWeakest map · 18% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
nukeA2213–959%0.01
infernoA2012–860%0.00
cacheB179–853%0.01
anubisB137–654%-0.01
mirageD112–918%0.01
ancientB115–645%-0.01
dust2C52–340%-0.01
rush_001—10–10%-0.05

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (18% over 11). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,617Matches
47%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
74.1ADR
33%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

40%1v1 clutch win
24%1v2 clutch win
10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis39651%1.0815.7
Nuke33054%1.1815.8
Ancient31447%1.0214.6
Inferno26546%1.0515.5
Train7152%1.1916.3
Mirage6226%0.9514.2
Vertigo4945%0.8712.6
Dust24726%0.8913.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

14.1%Headshot accuracy
40.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.2%Spray accuracy
66.5%Counter-strafing
10.0°Preaim
594msReaction time
65.8%T opening success
60.4%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
8.4%Flash assists
12.38HE damage / grenade
8.69Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 14.0798% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

18% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage3–13-0.0912%15 Oct →
cache13–60.0423%15 Oct →
mirage15–150.0717%15 Oct →
nuke13–40.0714%15 Oct →
mirage8–130.0019%15 Oct →
mirage15–15-0.0117%14 Oct →
cache11–130.0516%13 Oct →
mirage10–130.0212%12 Oct →
nuke13–110.013%12 Oct →
ancient16–14-0.0214%10 Oct →
nuke13–9-0.032%10 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0124%10 Oct →
anubis13–70.0110%10 Oct →
anubis13–10.0911%10 Oct →
nuke13–90.0511%10 Oct →
cache13–100.0620%10 Oct →
inferno0–5-0.0813%9 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.006%9 Oct →
cache16–130.0529%8 Oct →
cache5–13-0.070%7 Oct →
cache13–30.0416%7 Oct →
cache13–70.0012%7 Oct →
dust24–13-0.0221%7 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.0119%7 Oct →
ancient7–13-0.062%6 Oct →
nuke13–110.0316%6 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0212%5 Oct →
ancient11–130.0615%5 Oct →
rush_0013–7-0.0533%5 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.0613%4 Oct →
cache13–5-0.0317%3 Oct →
mirage13–20.0312%3 Oct →
mirage10–130.0211%3 Oct →
nuke10–130.0017%3 Oct →
cache8–130.0111%2 Oct →
inferno13–8-0.0217%2 Oct →
cache3–13-0.0814%2 Oct →
inferno13–80.029%2 Oct →
inferno13–90.066%2 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0214%1 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.066%30 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.026%30 Sept →
ancient13–60.0122%30 Sept →
inferno13–50.0319%30 Sept →
inferno13–100.0514%29 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.004%29 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0311%29 Sept →
mirage11–130.0610%29 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0514%29 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.048%28 Sept →
nuke13–80.0311%28 Sept →
anubis13–80.057%28 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0318%28 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0731%28 Sept →
dust21–13-0.0750%25 Sept →
inferno13–60.0012%25 Sept →
cache13–100.0813%25 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0612%24 Sept →
nuke15–15-0.0216%24 Sept →
dust213–9-0.0132%24 Sept →
inferno13–11-0.0215%24 Sept →
nuke6–130.0312%22 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0624%22 Sept →
nuke6–130.0223%20 Sept →
ancient13–4-0.019%20 Sept →
anubis16–14-0.0115%19 Sept →
ancient6–13-0.0713%19 Sept →
nuke13–50.0715%19 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0111%18 Sept →
anubis13–110.0110%17 Sept →
inferno13–90.049%17 Sept →
inferno13–90.0215%17 Sept →
inferno13–7-0.048%15 Sept →
anubis13–100.036%15 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0214%15 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0426%15 Sept →
nuke13–40.009%15 Sept →
cache13–60.016%15 Sept →
ancient13–110.0310%14 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.074%13 Sept →
cache13–60.0512%13 Sept →
dust213–60.1116%12 Sept →
anubis13–11-0.076%12 Sept →
nuke13–40.0124%12 Sept →
nuke13–60.0725%12 Sept →
nuke13–5-0.0513%12 Sept →
ancient13–8-0.058%12 Sept →
nuke3–13-0.0229%11 Sept →
inferno6–13-0.1110%11 Sept →
anubis9–13-0.0113%11 Sept →
ancient11–130.0214%11 Sept →
inferno13–80.076%11 Sept →
nuke13–90.063%11 Sept →
cache11–130.0416%11 Sept →
nuke13–20.0718%10 Sept →
inferno13–40.0620%9 Sept →
inferno9–130.0710%8 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0111%8 Sept →
ancient10–130.048%8 Sept →
anubis10–13-0.0929%8 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.