bedazi

bedazi — CS2 Stats

FI76561197993965365[U:1:33699637]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,916Tracked matches37%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,139Hours in CS7Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating18,427Purple band · top ~14.8% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 4 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 18,427 +839 24 Jun – 4 Nov · 29 days played
15,60020,393peak 20,39324 Jun4 Nov
20,758Peak Premier in tracked matches
35Days played since 2026-06-24

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,966 below peak (20,393)
  • -916 over 30 days · declining
  • +2,257 over 90 days
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 1,573 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate53.2%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy12.2%12.2%11.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.070.980.99above
Match win rate44.2%43.3%43.9%meets

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 4 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGbedaziFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPREMIER18,427 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim88
Positioning61
Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

COLD48–49–3Last 10048%Win rateLWLLLLWLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · −0.2pp headshot accuracy · −30ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 27%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 10

  • 3–7 · 30% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 572ms

Last 20

  • 7–13 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 587ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+0.8 against its own average).

Aim8.8
Utility4.9
Positioning6.1
Opening Duels5.3
Clutch4.8

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

m0NESY

Plays most like m0NESY 91% playstyle similarity

Most alike: aim profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower positioning profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 88 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 575ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.8
Positioning6.1
Utility4.9
Mechanics8.2
Opening Duels6.8
Win Impact0.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg 0.02
Reaction time573ms−58ms
first ⅓ avg 631ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy26.4%+2.4%
first ⅓ avg 24.0% → last ⅓ avg 26.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.25Best match rating · 13–3 · inferno, 16 Oct →
58%Best headshot accuracy · 13–2 · dust2, 28 Aug →
359msFastest reaction time · 6–13 · ancient, 27 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 18 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
2–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
6Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 7anubisWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA2616–1062%0.03
dust2C238–1535%0.01
nukeA2212–1055%0.03
anubisD113–827%0.01
ancientS75–271%0.05
mirageD62–433%0.01
cacheC52–340%0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

89,799Lifetime kills
1.07K/D · Top 50% of Level 3 players
4,310Matches
44.2%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
53.2%Headshot % · Top 10% of Level 3 players
12.2%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 3 players
11,050MVPs
1,714Hours (in match)
3,353Bombs planted
909Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4729,794
AWP8,069
MAC-103,236
FAMAS2,262
SG 5531,852
MP91,767

Lifetime map wins

12,169inferno
6,202nuke
5,181dust2
1,596train
433vertigo
258cbble
54office
45lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

90Matches
50%Win rate
0.97Avg K/D
79.8ADR
50%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

44%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis850%1.1316.4
Nuke771%0.7611.4
Inferno771%0.9313.9
Mirage633%1.0118.2
Dust2650%1.3720.0
Ancient333%0.7713.3
Vertigo1100%0.539.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

25.8%Headshot accuracy
37.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.6%Spray accuracy
87.0%Counter-strafing
8.2°Preaim
575msReaction time
59.2%T opening success
55.4%CT opening success
0.56Enemies flashed / flash
4.3%Flash assists
10.53HE damage / grenade
6.39Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust28–13-0.0131%4 Nov →
inferno13–30.2529%16 Oct →
mirage3–130.0929%16 Oct →
dust23–130.0121%16 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.0227%16 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.0214%14 Oct →
nuke13–70.1129%14 Oct →
inferno10–130.0922%14 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0330%30 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0320%30 Sept →
dust29–130.0326%30 Sept →
ancient13–110.0720%27 Sept →
anubis7–130.0322%27 Sept →
cache9–13-0.0222%27 Sept →
dust213–70.0723%27 Sept →
ancient13–70.0020%23 Sept →
dust27–130.0130%23 Sept →
anubis6–13-0.0143%10 Sept →
dust24–13-0.0230%10 Sept →
inferno13–90.0820%10 Sept →
dust27–130.0344%2 Sept →
anubis11–130.0125%2 Sept →
inferno13–5-0.0045%2 Sept →
anubis7–130.0244%1 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.0334%1 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0327%1 Sept →
nuke16–130.048%1 Sept →
anubis11–13-0.0118%1 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0215%31 Aug →
anubis11–8-0.0224%31 Aug →
inferno13–90.0321%31 Aug →
dust26–13-0.0330%29 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0226%29 Aug →
nuke13–40.1023%29 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0813%29 Aug →
nuke13–90.0926%28 Aug →
dust213–20.1458%28 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0736%28 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0439%27 Aug →
nuke15–150.0428%27 Aug →
nuke6–130.0317%27 Aug →
inferno4–130.0430%26 Aug →
dust213–70.0438%26 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.0032%26 Aug →
inferno13–60.0821%26 Aug →
dust213–5-0.0023%25 Aug →
anubis13–40.0122%25 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.1431%24 Aug →
inferno13–11-0.0722%24 Aug →
inferno13–100.0324%24 Aug →
nuke9–130.0328%24 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0223%23 Aug →
anubis6–130.0017%23 Aug →
nuke13–50.0623%22 Aug →
ancient13–50.0922%22 Aug →
inferno13–40.0526%22 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0025%18 Aug →
cache3–130.0112%18 Aug →
ancient13–10.0531%18 Aug →
inferno13–80.0440%18 Aug →
mirage13–100.0531%17 Aug →
dust211–130.0129%17 Aug →
nuke13–20.1422%16 Aug →
cache13–50.0823%16 Aug →
dust213–90.0622%16 Aug →
nuke13–90.1836%12 Aug →
inferno13–30.1029%12 Aug →
dust28–13-0.0324%11 Aug →
dust211–130.0626%8 Aug →
nuke2–13-0.0614%8 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0310%1 Aug →
inferno4–13-0.0310%30 Jul →
dust213–20.0134%30 Jul →
inferno13–90.0923%30 Jul →
cache13–80.0723%29 Jul →
inferno13–5-0.0213%29 Jul →
anubis5–130.0125%29 Jul →
nuke13–5-0.0221%29 Jul →
anubis13–90.0713%28 Jul →
dust213–40.1244%28 Jul →
inferno13–50.0238%28 Jul →
nuke13–30.0529%28 Jul →
ancient6–130.0930%27 Jul →
dust213–50.0618%27 Jul →
inferno8–13-0.0120%26 Jul →
inferno9–13-0.0324%26 Jul →
ancient11–130.0522%26 Jul →
nuke3–130.0320%23 Jul →
nuke13–40.1026%23 Jul →
nuke4–13-0.0119%23 Jul →
mirage12–16-0.0322%20 Jul →
inferno10–130.0325%20 Jul →
nuke13–16-0.0215%15 Jul →
inferno12–120.0526%15 Jul →
inferno13–80.0936%15 Jul →
mirage13–100.0120%15 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0533%9 Jul →
nuke13–90.0127%9 Jul →
dust26–13-0.0720%9 Jul →
nuke6–13-0.0541%24 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.