HiltoN

HiltoN — CS2 Stats

76561197993640661[U:1:33374933]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,889Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
3,168Hours in CS13Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.3 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating19,314Top 50% of 215,558 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~11.2% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#96599 of 261709 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,552 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 9 Nov 2026 (6 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Premier CS Rating · 19,314 → 19,314
0Faceit ELO · 1,552 → 1,552
+5Tracked matches · now 1,889
−10.0ppWin rate · 56.7% → 46.7%

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,314 +2,173 15 Sept – 9 Nov · 27 days played
17,06420,521peak 20,52115 Sept9 Nov
Faceit ELO: 1,552 +0 15 Sept – 9 Nov · 3 observations
1,5521,552peak 1,55215 Sept9 Nov
20,819Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,552Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
34Days played since 2026-09-15

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,552
  • Next: Level 9 at 1,751 — 199 to go
  • Reached: Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-09-15
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-09-15

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,207 below peak (20,521)
  • -1,207 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 686 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-11-09
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-15

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches5——
Win rate40%——
K/D1.08——
Headshot %46%——

Measured 9 Nov 2026 → 15 Nov 2026; no observation near 14 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,878), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate42.3%46.8%48.2%5.9% short
Shot accuracy10.7%13.0%13.2%2.5% short
Kill/death ratio1.091.061.07meets
Match win rate49.3%46.3%46.9%above

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHiltoNFACEITLevel 8 · 1,552 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER19,314 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,552csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning52
Utility79

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY52–47–1Last 10052%Win rateWLLLWLWWLL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · −0.03 avg rating · −2.5pp headshot accuracy · −90ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 531ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 503ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 548ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+3.1 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility7.9
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch3.6

Effective flashesHigh utility contribution

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 80% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 63% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Flashes. 0.79 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Utility. Utility score of 79 — grenade impact well above the norm.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 63% on T to 44% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.2
Utility7.9
Mechanics6.1
Opening Duels5.8
Win Impact3.9

Composite 6.3/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.00 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time542ms+19ms
first ⅓ avg 523ms → last ⅓ avg 542ms
Headshot accuracy16.8%+2.6%
first ⅓ avg 14.2% → last ⅓ avg 16.8%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–9 · anubis, 3 Oct →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · dust2, 16 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 13–11 · mirage, 12 Oct →
13–2Biggest win · mirage, 9 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
14–8In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
14Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 16dust2Weakest map · 37% over 19
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C197–1237%-0.02
anubisA1810–856%0.02
cacheB178–947%-0.02
infernoS1612–475%0.00
mirageC125–742%-0.01
nukeA95–456%-0.00
ancientA95–456%-0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (37% over 19). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

86,259Lifetime kills
1.09K/D · Top 50% of Level 8 players
3,611Matches
49.3%Match win rate · Top 25% of Level 8 players
42.3%Headshot %
10.7%Shot accuracy
9,588MVPs
2,105Hours (in match)
4,212Bombs planted
1,213Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4727,047
AWP5,354
Knife2,774
MAC-102,232
P2502,095
FAMAS1,885

Lifetime map wins

10,186inferno
5,750nuke
3,339dust2
1,168train
1,078vertigo
417cbble
36office
3aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

2,327Matches
49%Win rate
1.12Avg K/D
73.3ADR
43%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win
19%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno19947%0.9714.3
Nuke15352%0.9414.4
Dust212352%0.9314.1
Ancient10246%0.9913.6
Anubis9643%0.9413.9
Overpass9560%0.9814.0
Cache4650%0.9113.7
Mirage4536%0.7712.4

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.6%Headshot accuracy
34.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.0%Spray accuracy
77.6%Counter-strafing
9.1°Preaim
537msReaction time
62.7%T opening success
43.5%CT opening success
0.79Enemies flashed / flash
5.3%Flash assists
9.66HE damage / grenade
23.81Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

37% win rate across 19 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis13–110.0211%12 Nov →
dust212–16-0.059%9 Nov →
cache9–130.0115%9 Nov →
anubis7–13-0.0624%9 Nov →
nuke13–3-0.044%8 Nov →
dust211–130.0417%8 Nov →
dust213–5-0.0427%8 Nov →
dust213–30.0017%6 Nov →
ancient11–130.0311%5 Nov →
ancient8–13-0.0322%3 Nov →
anubis9–130.1021%3 Nov →
cache13–10-0.0224%2 Nov →
ancient13–60.0716%2 Nov →
nuke13–100.0318%2 Nov →
dust213–11-0.0520%2 Nov →
inferno13–100.0011%1 Nov →
anubis6–13-0.0126%1 Nov →
anubis11–13-0.0013%31 Oct →
cache13–90.0614%31 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0120%31 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0212%31 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0323%31 Oct →
dust216–14-0.0421%30 Oct →
anubis11–13-0.019%30 Oct →
inferno2–130.0012%30 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0319%30 Oct →
cache7–13-0.0520%30 Oct →
nuke10–13-0.0412%28 Oct →
inferno13–60.1017%28 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0316%27 Oct →
nuke16–140.0215%27 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0217%25 Oct →
dust27–130.0320%25 Oct →
inferno13–10-0.0311%25 Oct →
ancient13–50.0015%24 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0022%23 Oct →
nuke12–16-0.0116%23 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0116%23 Oct →
anubis10–13-0.0110%21 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.0819%21 Oct →
inferno13–90.0014%21 Oct →
inferno13–70.0118%20 Oct →
cache9–13-0.0224%20 Oct →
inferno19–17-0.0117%19 Oct →
anubis16–120.0116%19 Oct →
dust26–13-0.059%18 Oct →
cache13–100.0316%18 Oct →
cache13–5-0.079%17 Oct →
anubis13–50.0121%17 Oct →
ancient1–13-0.0816%16 Oct →
anubis13–70.0216%16 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0240%16 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0518%16 Oct →
dust28–130.0322%16 Oct →
anubis8–13-0.0513%15 Oct →
dust213–40.0130%15 Oct →
cache19–170.0020%15 Oct →
inferno13–110.0620%13 Oct →
cache4–13-0.0510%13 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0616%12 Oct →
cache1–13-0.1012%12 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0621%12 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.019%12 Oct →
inferno13–80.0126%12 Oct →
dust214–160.0112%11 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0824%11 Oct →
inferno9–130.009%11 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.0525%10 Oct →
mirage10–130.0221%10 Oct →
cache8–13-0.078%10 Oct →
nuke13–8-0.0420%10 Oct →
inferno15–15-0.0410%9 Oct →
mirage16–14-0.0119%9 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0210%9 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0010%9 Oct →
ancient10–130.0313%8 Oct →
cache16–120.018%8 Oct →
anubis13–80.0416%8 Oct →
nuke13–70.0413%8 Oct →
mirage13–5-0.0114%7 Oct →
ancient10–1-0.035%7 Oct →
mirage13–2-0.0219%7 Oct →
nuke14–16-0.0110%6 Oct →
anubis13–50.0713%6 Oct →
cache13–100.0416%6 Oct →
cache13–11-0.0410%5 Oct →
anubis13–6-0.0118%5 Oct →
dust213–3-0.039%5 Oct →
anubis13–70.0216%5 Oct →
nuke1–130.0214%5 Oct →
mirage2–130.0219%4 Oct →
dust211–13-0.0013%4 Oct →
cache8–130.0116%4 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0616%3 Oct →
anubis13–90.1319%3 Oct →
inferno13–60.0415%3 Oct →
cache13–160.0315%3 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0420%3 Oct →
dust27–13-0.016%2 Oct →
anubis13–50.0617%2 Oct →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.