HammerChilli

HammerChilli — CS2 Stats

US76561197993429218[U:1:33163490]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,603Tracked matches55%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,631Hours in CS
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating17,443Purple band · top ~18.7% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 5 · 1,244 ELOTop 67.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 14 Sep 2026 (4 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 1,603 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 38 days played since 11 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 17,443 +806 2 Aug18 Sept · 23 days played
15,63717,494peak 17,4942 Aug18 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,244 +0 29 Aug18 Sept · 4 observations
1,2441,244peak 1,24429 Aug18 Sept
17,862Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,244Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,244
  • Next: Level 7 at 1,351 107 to go
  • Reached: Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4 · Level 3
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 5 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • 51 below peak (17,494)
  • +155 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 2,557 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 5 among CSDB-tracked players (n=12,017), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 5 medianLevel 6 medianvs Level 6
Headshot rate53.7%43.8%44.8%above
Shot accuracy13.4%12.0%12.4%above
Kill/death ratio1.011.021.040.02 short
Match win rate37.3%44.7%45.2%8.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 6 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 6 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGHammerChilliFACEITLevel 5 · 1,244 ELOSTANDINGTop 67.6% of rankedPREMIER17,443 · Purple bandPEAK ELO1,244csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim73
Positioning49
Utility54

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45532Last 10045%Win rateLWTLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.03 avg rating · +3.4pp headshot accuracy · +37ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 131 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 555ms

Last 10

  • 541 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 562ms

Last 20

  • 1091 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.3
Utility5.4
Positioning4.9
Opening Duels4.0
Clutch1.8

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 550ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.3
Positioning4.9
Utility5.4
Mechanics6.8
Opening Duels3.4
Win Impact6.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.00 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time548ms−69ms
first ⅓ avg 617ms → last ⅓ avg 548ms
Headshot accuracy16.6%+0.3%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.6%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.11Best match rating · 13–9 · mirage, 23 Jul
32%Best headshot accuracy · 13–6 · nuke, 14 Jul
391msFastest reaction time · 5–13 · cache, 7 Aug
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 12 Aug

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
78In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
9Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 16mirageWeakest map · 27% over 11
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientC2071335%0.01
infernoC1981142%-0.01
nukeA1610663%0.02
anubisB136746%-0.01
mirageD113827%0.01
dust2A116555%0.01
cacheB105550%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (27% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

162,265Lifetime kills
1.01K/D
7,101Matches
37.3%Match win rate
53.7%Headshot % · Top 25% of Level 5 players
13.4%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 5 players
14,117MVPs
4,631Hours (in match)
5,918Bombs planted
1,585Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4780,841
AWP11,533
P2504,632
FAMAS3,302
MAC-101,593

Lifetime map wins

11,384dust2
9,460inferno
6,191nuke
2,269train
819cbble
724vertigo
303dust
294aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

390Matches
47%Win rate
1.06Avg K/D
84.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

29%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
9Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage8651%1.0816.7
Inferno6242%0.9715.7
Dust25244%1.0516.4
Ancient4842%1.0216.4
Nuke4556%1.2116.1
Anubis3639%0.9816.4
Overpass2152%1.1316.4
Train1662%1.3818.8

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.8%Headshot accuracy
34.2%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.0%Spray accuracy
80.5%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
550msReaction time
37.4%T opening success
49.8%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
9.4%Flash assists
8.74HE damage / grenade
6.74Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4643 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.3594% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

27% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
mirage8–13-0.0616%1 Sept
dust213–80.0622%1 Sept
mirage15–150.0523%31 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0313%31 Aug
ancient9–130.0920%30 Aug
cache13–110.0512%30 Aug
nuke13–9-0.0117%30 Aug
ancient13–20.1114%29 Aug
dust211–130.0324%29 Aug
nuke13–30.0713%29 Aug
cache13–110.0218%29 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0410%29 Aug
cache13–30.087%29 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0411%28 Aug
nuke13–100.0220%28 Aug
dust25–130.016%28 Aug
nuke8–130.0117%26 Aug
cache9–13-0.0723%25 Aug
nuke13–100.049%24 Aug
inferno11–130.0219%24 Aug
nuke13–60.0322%21 Aug
anubis13–8-0.0521%21 Aug
dust26–130.0017%19 Aug
ancient13–11-0.0318%19 Aug
inferno5–13-0.0616%19 Aug
inferno16–130.0117%18 Aug
nuke13–40.0112%18 Aug
inferno8–130.0016%18 Aug
ancient13–70.0221%18 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0520%18 Aug
nuke9–130.0320%17 Aug
anubis13–80.0714%16 Aug
dust213–80.1020%16 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0118%15 Aug
mirage8–130.0218%15 Aug
dust213–100.0131%15 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0514%15 Aug
dust28–13-0.0517%13 Aug
ancient13–20.0718%13 Aug
nuke13–60.0314%13 Aug
inferno16–12-0.0112%13 Aug
anubis13–110.0419%12 Aug
anubis13–10.0719%12 Aug
inferno13–5-0.0118%11 Aug
ancient8–130.0314%11 Aug
cache13–7-0.0313%11 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0419%11 Aug
cache13–20.0518%8 Aug
cache14–160.0211%7 Aug
cache5–130.0316%7 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0213%7 Aug
mirage10–13-0.0211%7 Aug
inferno13–110.0222%6 Aug
nuke13–80.0222%6 Aug
dust213–10-0.0712%6 Aug
ancient7–130.0313%6 Aug
mirage13–6-0.0119%6 Aug
mirage5–13-0.0213%6 Aug
ancient8–13-0.0216%6 Aug
nuke4–13-0.0015%6 Aug
inferno12–16-0.0313%3 Aug
ancient13–110.109%2 Aug
inferno9–130.0118%2 Aug
anubis3–10-0.0216%2 Aug
mirage12–16-0.0616%1 Aug
dust210–13-0.0420%1 Aug
inferno15–15-0.0411%1 Aug
nuke7–90.0118%1 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0814%31 Jul
mirage13–70.0328%31 Jul
mirage5–130.0823%30 Jul
inferno13–9-0.0013%29 Jul
nuke7–130.0115%29 Jul
ancient4–130.0213%28 Jul
anubis13–6-0.0111%25 Jul
nuke14–160.0016%25 Jul
mirage13–90.1124%23 Jul
inferno6–130.0613%23 Jul
inferno3–13-0.0811%21 Jul
inferno8–130.007%20 Jul
ancient13–70.0111%19 Jul
ancient8–13-0.055%19 Jul
mirage14–160.0518%19 Jul
ancient11–13-0.0316%18 Jul
ancient5–30.016%18 Jul
cache9–13-0.0715%17 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0512%17 Jul
anubis0–13-0.119%16 Jul
nuke13–60.0732%14 Jul
anubis0–13-0.067%14 Jul
cache9–13-0.0630%12 Jul
ancient4–13-0.0517%12 Jul
nuke13–90.0318%12 Jul
ancient5–13-0.0323%12 Jul
dust213–70.0122%12 Jul
inferno13–50.0922%12 Jul
dust213–50.0519%12 Jul
inferno13–90.0214%12 Jul
ancient9–13-0.0321%12 Jul
anubis13–90.0318%11 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →