[BasicBitch] Badwu1f

[BasicBitch] Badwu1f — CS2 Stats

US76561197991133016[U:1:30867288]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,522Tracked matches56%Win rate2024Tracked since
1,206Hours in CS26Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating2.9 LearningSupport
FaceitLevel 3 · 772 ELOTop 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian II
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 17 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 772 → 772
+4Tracked matches · now 1,522
−3.7ppWin rate · 59.3% → 55.6%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 3 Aug 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Faceit ELO: 772 +0 17 Sept20 Sept · 2 observations
772772peak 77217 Sept20 Sept
772Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-08-03

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 772
  • Next: Level 4 at 901 129 to go
  • Reached: Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-09-17
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-17

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 7 days vs previous 7

MetricLast 7Previous 7Change
Matches1031−21
Win rate40%55%−15pp
K/D0.660.70−0.04
Headshot %24%37%−13pp

Measured 13 Sep 202620 Sep 2026; previous 4 Sep 2026 → 13 Sep 2026.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=9,169), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate29.9%41.9%42.7%12.8% short
Shot accuracy0.0%12.2%11.3%11.3% short
Kill/death ratio0.740.980.990.26 short
Match win rate43.5%43.3%43.9%meets

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GG[BasicBitch] Badwu1fFACEITLevel 3 · 772 ELOSTANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedPEAK ELO772csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim34
Positioning35
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45496Last 10045%Win rateLLWLLWTWTW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −30pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −5.7pp headshot accuracy · +99ms reaction

Win rate down 30pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.01), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 14 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 7%
  • Avg reaction 561ms

Last 10

  • 442 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 7%
  • Avg reaction 591ms

Last 20

  • 1163 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 10%
  • Avg reaction 541ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim3.4
Utility3.6
Positioning3.5
Opening Duels0.0
Clutch0.8

Strong CT-side openerLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 73% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 36% on CT to 8% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Counter-strafing. Only 58% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim3.4
Positioning3.5
Utility3.6
Mechanics1.7
Opening Duels0.7
Win Impact6.9

Composite 2.9/10 (Learning), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.00
first ⅓ avg -0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time535ms−46ms
first ⅓ avg 580ms → last ⅓ avg 535ms
Headshot accuracy10.0%+1.5%
first ⅓ avg 8.5% → last ⅓ avg 10.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.18Best match rating · 3–1 · anubis, 9 Sept
20%Best headshot accuracy · 9–13 · dust2, 8 Sept
359msFastest reaction time · 13–8 · nuke, 8 Sept
13–1Biggest win · inferno, 8 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
L2Current streak
67In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 9dust2Weakest map · 22% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2D1841422%-0.04
cacheC1771041%-0.02
nukeC1661038%-0.03
mirageA138562%-0.02
anubisS96367%0.00
infernoA85363%0.00
poseidonS64267%-0.02
ancientD62433%-0.05
eldorado32167%-0.00
train2020%-0.02
vertigo21150%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

18,339Lifetime kills
0.74K/D
1,700Matches
43.5%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 3 players
29.9%Headshot %
0.0%Shot accuracy
2,309MVPs
587Hours (in match)
4,212Bombs planted
317Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,444dust2
2,030nuke
1,119inferno
1,051vertigo
1,032train
70office
46italy
1ar_shoots

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

67Matches
46%Win rate
0.70Avg K/D
58.1ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

24%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
5Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage2055%0.7611.3
Ancient1729%0.689.8
Nuke956%0.7211.2
Dust2850%0.589.5
Train540%0.7712.6
Overpass3100%0.7213.3
Anubis333%0.598.7
Inferno10%0.7311.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

9.7%Headshot accuracy
30.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
57.6%Counter-strafing
11.2°Preaim
535msReaction time
8.4%T opening success
35.9%CT opening success
0.65Enemies flashed / flash
6.1%Flash assists
7.77HE damage / grenade
2.22Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 9.6991% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training
  2. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.2213 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups
  3. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 8.4494% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategyDust 2 grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno8–13-0.039%19 Sept
mirage8–13-0.064%19 Sept
poseidon9–20.070%17 Sept
dust211–130.0014%17 Sept
nuke8–13-0.017%14 Sept
mirage13–40.037%14 Sept
dust212–12-0.0411%14 Sept
mirage13–80.014%13 Sept
train12–12-0.0214%12 Sept
cache13–60.065%10 Sept
ancient13–3-0.069%9 Sept
inferno13–11-0.0318%9 Sept
cache3–13-0.0518%9 Sept
anubis3–10.1814%9 Sept
anubis13–20.028%9 Sept
mirage13–5-0.069%9 Sept
cache12–12-0.0418%9 Sept
nuke13–8-0.0411%8 Sept
vertigo13–50.047%8 Sept
dust29–13-0.0220%8 Sept
poseidon7–9-0.1316%8 Sept
nuke13–8-0.084%8 Sept
cache5–13-0.089%8 Sept
dust22–13-0.0612%8 Sept
inferno13–10.026%8 Sept
mirage13–3-0.017%7 Sept
dust27–130.035%7 Sept
ancient7–13-0.0411%7 Sept
dust27–13-0.1014%7 Sept
poseidon9–7-0.0717%7 Sept
poseidon9–4-0.029%7 Sept
dust26–13-0.108%6 Sept
cache13–4-0.025%6 Sept
dust213–11-0.021%6 Sept
anubis13–110.004%6 Sept
nuke4–13-0.1518%5 Sept
ancient6–13-0.0613%5 Sept
dust29–13-0.089%2 Sept
anubis10–13-0.090%2 Sept
eldorado5–9-0.123%2 Sept
poseidon9–20.158%2 Sept
dust212–12-0.0211%1 Sept
ancient13–6-0.028%1 Sept
cache3–8-0.055%1 Sept
cache13–8-0.025%30 Aug
dust25–13-0.0512%30 Aug
nuke6–13-0.0610%30 Aug
anubis13–9-0.013%30 Aug
mirage13–70.0214%30 Aug
dust213–9-0.0319%29 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0313%29 Aug
cache0–11-0.0618%29 Aug
ancient9–13-0.0216%29 Aug
nuke9–13-0.035%29 Aug
cache13–70.027%27 Aug
mirage5–13-0.037%27 Aug
cache13–4-0.028%27 Aug
inferno8–13-0.0310%27 Aug
dust213–50.026%26 Aug
mirage3–13-0.006%26 Aug
ancient11–13-0.096%26 Aug
train6–13-0.0115%25 Aug
mirage13–60.029%25 Aug
dust29–13-0.0811%25 Aug
inferno13–20.0617%25 Aug
cache13–70.018%20 Aug
nuke13–100.019%20 Aug
eldorado9–40.003%20 Aug
poseidon6–9-0.129%20 Aug
nuke2–3-0.000%19 Aug
cache5–13-0.056%19 Aug
cache13–30.0218%18 Aug
nuke13–10.068%18 Aug
mirage4–13-0.069%18 Aug
anubis13–50.004%17 Aug
eldorado9–30.1013%17 Aug
anubis13–10.0313%17 Aug
anubis11–13-0.046%17 Aug
mirage13–10-0.0314%17 Aug
cache10–130.009%16 Aug
dust213–11-0.067%16 Aug
nuke12–12-0.0411%15 Aug
nuke1–6-0.030%15 Aug
cache12–12-0.036%15 Aug
nuke13–50.026%13 Aug
mirage11–2-0.017%13 Aug
anubis6–13-0.0610%12 Aug
mirage6–13-0.0618%11 Aug
dust210–13-0.115%11 Aug
inferno13–100.0311%11 Aug
vertigo6–130.0110%11 Aug
nuke13–3-0.053%11 Aug
dust27–130.0312%11 Aug
cache5–13-0.047%11 Aug
cache9–13-0.0011%6 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0213%5 Aug
nuke5–13-0.089%3 Aug
inferno13–70.029%3 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0115%3 Aug
dust27–13-0.080%3 Aug

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →