Bear ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ

Bear ʕ •ᴥ•ʔ — CS2 Stats

DK76561197988050680[U:1:27784952]Steam profile ↗VAC banned

962Tracked matches43%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,377Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.6 SolidSupport
CSDB Leaderboard#65440 of 261537 tracked
FaceitLevel 9 · 2,203 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,409 -1,039 15 May – 18 Jun · 4 days played
21,40922,764peak 22,76415 May18 Jun
22,885Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,203Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
20Days played since 2025-01-05

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,203
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 297 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=15,132), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 9 medianLevel 10 medianvs Level 10
Headshot rate41.3%48.2%50.9%9.7% short
Shot accuracy16.9%13.2%13.7%above
Kill/death ratio1.121.071.09above
Match win rate46.4%46.9%48.4%2.0% short

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGBear ʕ •ᴥ•ʔFACEITLevel 9 · 2,203 ELOSTANDINGTop 20.7% of rankedPEAK ELO2,203csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning52
Utility66

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY28–29Last 5749%Win rateLLLWLWWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · +2.6pp headshot accuracy · −93ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 1–4 · 20% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 494ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 455ms

Last 20

  • 8–12 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 501ms

Newest first, from the last 57 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility6.6
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.0
Clutch4.6

Strong CT-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

b1t

Plays most like b1t 81% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 46% on CT to 27% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning5.2
Utility6.6
Mechanics6.7
Opening Duels2.0
Win Impact2.8

Composite 5.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time496ms−102ms
first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 496ms
Headshot accuracy15.1%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 16.9% → last ⅓ avg 15.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 57 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 3–7 · nuke, 18 Jun →
40%Best headshot accuracy · 4–0 · inferno, 27 Mar →
422msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · inferno, 23 Jul →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 20 Feb →

Across the last 57 tracked matches.

Highlights

3Longest win streak
L3Current streak
3–5In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
2Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 62% over 13anubisWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoA138–562%0.02
nukeC125–742%0.00
ancientB84–450%0.00
dust2C83–538%-0.03
cacheA74–357%0.01
anubisD51–420%0.00
overpass—33–0100%0.00
train—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 57 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

112,071Lifetime kills
1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players
4,889Matches
46.4%Match win rate
41.3%Headshot %
16.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players
14,046MVPs
2,377Hours (in match)
7,687Bombs planted
1,991Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,155
AWP6,657
FAMAS3,956
P2503,195
MAC-102,772
MP92,016

Lifetime map wins

14,906inferno
5,912nuke
4,318train
3,896vertigo
2,526dust2
1,682cbble
133office
44lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,483Matches
51%Win rate
1.13Avg K/D
82.4ADR
40%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

43%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8957%1.1716.2
Ancient5951%1.1316.7
Anubis5740%1.0816.2
Nuke5547%1.0114.7
Vertigo3444%1.1315.5
Dust22236%0.9514.4
Overpass1867%1.0416.8
Train1540%1.1016.1

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

16.1%Headshot accuracy
34.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
38.2%Spray accuracy
80.2%Counter-strafing
11.1°Preaim
532msReaction time
27.1%T opening success
46.2%CT opening success
0.53Enemies flashed / flash
5.6%Flash assists
11.30HE damage / grenade
9.53Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 27.0893% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient14–16-0.0312%7 Oct →
nuke9–13-0.0117%4 Sept →
anubis13–160.0116%4 Sept →
ancient13–60.0523%30 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0217%30 Aug →
inferno13–100.0018%30 Aug →
cache13–50.0932%30 Aug →
anubis0–2-0.030%23 Jul →
inferno13–30.0913%23 Jul →
ancient1–13-0.0918%23 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.0310%23 Jul →
cache9–13-0.029%23 Jul →
cache0–13-0.040%23 Jul →
inferno13–30.1025%23 Jul →
nuke10–130.0018%2 Jul →
nuke3–70.1213%18 Jun →
anubis3–100.0923%18 Jun →
ancient9–130.0212%18 Jun →
dust213–7-0.0611%18 Jun →
cache13–7-0.0318%18 Jun →
inferno11–13-0.0517%7 Jun →
overpass13–90.0219%7 Jun →
dust25–13-0.0627%7 Jun →
cache13–40.0613%7 Jun →
inferno8–130.0512%7 Jun →
anubis7–13-0.074%3 Jun →
inferno13–50.0219%3 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0230%3 Jun →
inferno13–3-0.0212%3 Jun →
cache13–80.0413%3 Jun →
dust28–130.0315%15 May →
inferno7–30.0713%15 May →
nuke13–100.0015%15 May →
ancient13–11-0.0110%15 May →
inferno9–13-0.0115%15 May →
dust213–10-0.0014%23 Apr →
inferno11–130.0221%23 Apr →
overpass13–100.0014%23 Apr →
nuke13–6-0.0028%23 Apr →
nuke10–13-0.0111%2 Apr →
dust28–130.0121%27 Mar →
nuke13–70.0315%27 Mar →
inferno4–0-0.0340%27 Mar →
dust210–13-0.0614%20 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0212%20 Feb →
ancient13–1-0.017%20 Feb →
anubis13–90.0215%20 Feb →
inferno8–13-0.0219%20 Feb →
overpass13–11-0.0218%4 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0314%27 Jan →
inferno13–90.0314%12 Nov →
nuke13–110.0619%12 Nov →
dust213–8-0.0714%29 Oct →
train6–13-0.0411%29 Oct →
nuke6–13-0.0618%23 Mar →
ancient7–130.0414%12 Jan →
ancient13–90.0421%5 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO500 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.