MANTIS

MANTIS — CS2 Stats

HU76561197987613706[U:1:27347978]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

782Tracked matches50%Win rate2025Tracked since
5,032Hours in CS2Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating7.3 StrongPositional Player
Premier CS Rating19,745Top 50% of 205,416 CSDB-tracked playersPurple band · top ~9.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#86993 of 252584 tracked
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 8 Oct 2026 (9 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 19,745 +5,287 6 Aug – 8 Oct · 22 days played
14,45819,963peak 19,9636 Aug8 Oct
19,999Peak Premier in tracked matches
19Days played since 2026-08-06

Premier CS Rating

  • 218 below peak (19,963)
  • +1,468 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 255 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-09-01
  • Blue band first seen 2026-09-01

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate36.8%44.3%46.9%10.1% short
Shot accuracy15.9%11.9%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio0.891.031.080.19 short
Match win rate38.5%45.2%46.7%8.1% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMANTISPREMIER19,745 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning82
Utility38

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT54–44–2Last 10054%Win rateLLWLWWWWWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +20pp win rate · +0.00 avg rating · +1.7pp headshot accuracy · +1ms reaction

Win rate up 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 549ms

Last 10

  • 7–3 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 23%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 536ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility3.8
Positioning8.2
Opening Duels7.8

Sharp aimerLimited utility dependenceStrong positioning

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

s1mple

Plays most like s1mple 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

CT openings. 67% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

T openings. 62% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

Preaim. Mechanical aim is strong but the crosshair sits 10.5° off target when enemies appear — placement, not flicking, is the bigger win available.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning8.2
Utility3.8
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels8.7
Win Impact5.0

Composite 7.3/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.04−0.03
first ⅓ avg 0.06 → last ⅓ avg 0.04
Reaction time537ms−66ms
first ⅓ avg 604ms → last ⅓ avg 537ms
Headshot accuracy20.3%−2.9%
first ⅓ avg 23.3% → last ⅓ avg 20.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.17Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 7 Aug →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 2–13 · mirage, 5 Oct →
320msFastest reaction time · 1–5 · anubis, 16 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · nuke, 10 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

10Longest win streak
L2Current streak
3–11In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 67% over 6ancientWeakest map · 44% over 18
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B2915–1452%0.07
ancientC188–1044%0.04
nukeS1711–665%0.05
anubisB147–750%0.04
cacheA106–460%0.05
mirageB63–350%0.02
infernoS64–267%0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Ancient is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (44% over 18). Start with the 6 essential Ancient lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

82,611Lifetime kills
0.89K/D
4,620Matches
38.5%Match win rate
36.8%Headshot %
15.9%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
10,854MVPs
1,809Hours (in match)
3,976Bombs planted
783Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AWP24,143
AK-4719,015
P903,305
Tec-91,845
MAC-101,565

Lifetime map wins

25,285dust2
3,296nuke
1,636inferno
927cbble
760office
345train
56lake
27bank

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

64Matches
39%Win rate
1.00Avg K/D
—ADR
31%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

—1v1 clutch win
—1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWL

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.1%Headshot accuracy
39.1%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.9%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
10.5°Preaim
537msReaction time
62.4%T opening success
66.8%CT opening success
0.51Enemies flashed / flash
12.3%Flash assists
6.23HE damage / grenade
2.60Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 2.6009 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Ancient

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

44% win rate across 18 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Ancient callouts & strategy →Ancient grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
anubis9–130.0217%8 Oct →
mirage2–13-0.0650%5 Oct →
dust216–120.0721%5 Oct →
ancient14–160.0619%23 Sept →
dust213–80.0920%15 Sept →
ancient13–70.0724%15 Sept →
inferno13–80.0419%15 Sept →
dust213–100.0424%15 Sept →
dust216–140.0825%13 Sept →
cache13–7-0.0411%30 Aug →
dust25–13-0.0222%22 Aug →
ancient13–60.0712%22 Aug →
inferno13–100.0017%22 Aug →
dust213–70.1638%22 Aug →
nuke13–50.0523%22 Aug →
anubis9–130.0126%22 Aug →
ancient13–60.0921%20 Aug →
dust28–130.0315%20 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0318%18 Aug →
ancient11–130.0121%17 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0521%16 Aug →
anubis1–5-0.0115%16 Aug →
ancient13–60.1020%16 Aug →
dust29–130.0120%16 Aug →
nuke11–13-0.0411%16 Aug →
ancient13–80.0818%16 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.059%16 Aug →
nuke13–50.0316%16 Aug →
dust210–130.0214%16 Aug →
ancient10–130.0923%13 Aug →
cache13–90.0716%13 Aug →
dust213–40.1423%13 Aug →
dust211–130.0724%13 Aug →
inferno13–110.0426%13 Aug →
anubis4–13-0.0521%13 Aug →
anubis13–30.1421%13 Aug →
cache13–30.0618%13 Aug →
dust213–50.1321%13 Aug →
dust213–60.0925%13 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.1017%13 Aug →
dust213–80.0520%13 Aug →
nuke13–80.1526%13 Aug →
anubis13–80.0310%13 Aug →
ancient13–9-0.0234%12 Aug →
cache13–100.1329%12 Aug →
anubis13–10-0.0226%12 Aug →
dust213–110.1221%12 Aug →
nuke13–70.0826%12 Aug →
ancient13–70.0917%12 Aug →
mirage13–90.0817%12 Aug →
ancient8–130.0923%12 Aug →
nuke1–80.0029%12 Aug →
dust213–50.0918%12 Aug →
mirage14–16-0.0129%12 Aug →
inferno11–13-0.0326%11 Aug →
dust25–130.0130%11 Aug →
cache10–130.0627%11 Aug →
anubis9–13-0.0316%11 Aug →
nuke13–90.0634%11 Aug →
anubis10–130.1031%11 Aug →
ancient3–13-0.0822%11 Aug →
dust211–130.0819%11 Aug →
dust215–150.0729%11 Aug →
nuke13–4-0.0016%11 Aug →
dust24–130.0530%11 Aug →
ancient16–120.0917%11 Aug →
dust27–130.1237%10 Aug →
nuke13–10.1311%10 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0310%10 Aug →
mirage13–6-0.0113%10 Aug →
cache10–130.0523%10 Aug →
dust213–30.0724%10 Aug →
cache13–70.0632%10 Aug →
dust212–160.0125%10 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0121%10 Aug →
anubis13–70.0821%10 Aug →
anubis13–4-0.0120%10 Aug →
nuke13–90.0417%10 Aug →
nuke13–80.0523%10 Aug →
dust213–100.0524%10 Aug →
cache11–13-0.0220%10 Aug →
ancient15–150.0719%9 Aug →
anubis8–130.1521%9 Aug →
nuke16–130.0320%9 Aug →
ancient6–130.0317%9 Aug →
dust213–50.0836%9 Aug →
ancient11–130.0134%9 Aug →
cache13–30.1528%8 Aug →
nuke13–60.1217%8 Aug →
inferno13–40.0931%8 Aug →
mirage13–60.0621%8 Aug →
dust27–130.1029%7 Aug →
dust213–100.1727%7 Aug →
mirage5–130.0536%7 Aug →
anubis8–40.1316%7 Aug →
dust210–130.0745%7 Aug →
inferno6–13-0.0320%6 Aug →
nuke9–130.1021%6 Aug →
anubis16–130.0829%6 Aug →
nuke7–130.1419%6 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

500 Matches10-Win Streak
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.