Moxsan — CS2 Stats

NO76561197986360671[U:1:26094943]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,537Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

3,513Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating5.9 SolidHybrid Rifler

Premier CS Rating19,882Purple band · top ~9% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#17765 of 43668 tracked

FaceitLevel 10 · 2,000 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanLegendary Eagle Master

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

19,829Peak Premier on CSDB

2,000Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

1Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 2,000
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 1 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 19,882
Next: Pink band at 20,000 — 118 to go
Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28
Blue band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=4,917), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 10 median
Headshot rate	47.0%	51.9%
Shot accuracy	17.2%	13.7%
Kill/death ratio	1.17	1.08
Match win rate	47.7%	48.7%

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim81

Positioning46

Utility49

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY50–47–3Last 10050%Win rateWLLWWLWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Hybrid Rifler — Aim-led profile without a single dominant tendency.

Aim8.1

Aggression5.3

Utility4.9

Positioning4.6

Opening Duels1.4

Clutch3.6

Limited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like NiKo 88% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, aim profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Positioning. Positioning trails aim by 35 points — deaths here waste a strong aim profile.

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.1

Positioning4.6

Utility4.9

Mechanics5.7

Opening Duels1.4

Win Impact8.3

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.02+0.01

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.02

Reaction time510ms−85ms

first ⅓ avg 596ms → last ⅓ avg 510ms

Headshot accuracy21.2%+1.4%

first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 21.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.10Best rating — nuke 13–8

13–0Biggest win — nuke

5Longest win streak

5–10In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

9Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 16mirageWeakest map · 11% over 9

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	C	25	9–16	36%	0.01
cache	B	19	10–9	53%	0.00
inferno	S	16	12–4	75%	0.02
nuke	A	14	9–5	64%	0.02
ancient	C	10	4–6	40%	0.01
mirage	D	9	1–8	11%	-0.01
anubis	—	4	3–1	75%	0.02
overpass	—	2	2–0	100%	0.04
vertigo	—	1	0–1	0%	-0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (11% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

109,828Lifetime kills

1.17K/D · Top 50% of Level 10 players

4,988Matches

47.7%Match win rate

47.0%Headshot %

17.2%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players

14,145MVPs

2,138Hours (in match)

5,582Bombs planted

1,586Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4730,745

M4A4 / M4A1-S21,886

AWP9,713

P2000 / USP-S6,589

Glock-184,920

Desert Eagle3,458

P2503,191

Five-SeveN2,554

XM10142,280

FAMAS2,108

Lifetime map wins

9,831inferno

6,269dust2

5,089nuke

1,820train

1,464vertigo

935cbble

509aztec

205office

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

593Matches

53%Win rate

1.07Avg K/D

76.1ADR

45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

38%1v1 clutch win

20%1v2 clutch win

10Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLWLWL

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Inferno	36	47%	1.07	15.1
Nuke	34	56%	1.01	14.7
Anubis	20	70%	1.23	15.8
Mirage	19	53%	0.97	13.4
Overpass	19	63%	1.21	16.4
Dust2	18	61%	0.90	15.2
Ancient	15	27%	0.85	12.9
Vertigo	12	42%	0.97	15.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

20.9%Headshot accuracy

36.5%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

38.8%Spray accuracy

75.8%Counter-strafing

9.3°Preaim

510msReaction time

36.7%T opening success

34.2%CT opening success

0.66Enemies flashed / flash

5.4%Flash assists

11.21HE damage / grenade

2.25Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

Grenades & Utility
You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.
Flashes per match 2.25 — below the 4 mark we flag
Grenade Lineups →
Advanced Mechanics
You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.
T opening duels 36.7191% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

11% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–8	-0.01	22%	29 Aug →
mirage	8–13	0.03	23%	29 Aug →
nuke	11–13	0.04	25%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.08	28%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–8	0.10	25%	27 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.03	10%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	29%	26 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	17%	26 Aug →
cache	6–13	-0.05	23%	25 Aug →
anubis	13–7	0.04	20%	25 Aug →
cache	13–9	0.08	21%	25 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.03	28%	24 Aug →
inferno	8–13	-0.03	19%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.02	15%	22 Aug →
anubis	13–6	-0.01	31%	21 Aug →
nuke	13–0	0.10	25%	21 Aug →
dust2	11–13	-0.01	21%	21 Aug →
ancient	11–13	-0.02	20%	21 Aug →
dust2	5–13	-0.00	31%	21 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.02	16%	20 Aug →
ancient	9–13	0.02	24%	20 Aug →
mirage	6–13	0.02	18%	19 Aug →
inferno	13–2	0.06	20%	19 Aug →
cache	13–7	0.00	23%	17 Aug →
ancient	8–13	-0.02	15%	17 Aug →
nuke	6–1	-0.01	11%	17 Aug →
dust2	13–5	0.02	16%	17 Aug →
nuke	8–1	-0.00	12%	14 Aug →
inferno	13–8	0.03	15%	14 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.03	12%	12 Aug →
mirage	1–9	0.01	28%	12 Aug →
dust2	13–11	0.01	41%	11 Aug →
inferno	13–5	-0.01	18%	11 Aug →
mirage	7–13	-0.04	28%	10 Aug →
dust2	16–12	0.08	23%	9 Aug →
nuke	13–2	-0.05	8%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	0.00	12%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.05	22%	8 Aug →
dust2	13–7	0.03	16%	8 Aug →
cache	13–3	0.02	15%	8 Aug →
nuke	8–13	0.03	31%	7 Aug →
nuke	13–10	-0.01	24%	6 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.06	29%	6 Aug →
cache	13–8	0.03	21%	4 Aug →
vertigo	9–13	-0.00	17%	1 Aug →
ancient	13–10	0.06	23%	1 Aug →
mirage	9–13	0.00	24%	1 Aug →
inferno	7–13	-0.03	22%	1 Aug →
dust2	7–13	0.02	18%	1 Aug →
nuke	13–16	-0.00	30%	1 Aug →
ancient	11–13	0.01	14%	30 Jul →
dust2	15–15	-0.09	10%	30 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.02	24%	30 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.00	17%	30 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.06	25%	18 Jul →
inferno	4–13	-0.03	30%	17 Jul →
dust2	4–13	0.04	21%	17 Jul →
inferno	13–9	0.08	30%	17 Jul →
dust2	10–13	0.02	23%	11 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.02	14%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	0.01	35%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	22%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.07	29%	10 Jul →
inferno	16–14	0.06	16%	8 Jul →
cache	11–13	-0.01	14%	8 Jul →
inferno	13–5	-0.00	10%	8 Jul →
nuke	9–13	-0.04	16%	27 Jun →
inferno	8–13	-0.01	23%	27 Jun →
overpass	13–10	0.05	17%	17 Jun →
anubis	13–8	0.05	14%	17 Jun →
ancient	8–13	-0.00	21%	17 Jun →
dust2	14–16	-0.04	22%	15 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.04	13%	14 Jun →
cache	12–12	0.01	18%	14 Jun →
dust2	7–13	0.01	18%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–9	0.08	20%	12 Jun →
inferno	13–3	0.06	14%	12 Jun →
mirage	11–13	-0.08	19%	12 Jun →
dust2	13–8	0.02	17%	12 Jun →
anubis	15–15	-0.01	18%	10 Jun →
dust2	7–13	-0.00	25%	8 Jun →
nuke	13–6	-0.02	31%	8 Jun →
nuke	13–4	0.07	11%	8 Jun →
dust2	9–13	0.09	15%	8 Jun →
cache	13–11	0.03	36%	8 Jun →
nuke	8–13	0.06	27%	6 Jun →
ancient	13–4	0.02	39%	6 Jun →
dust2	13–4	0.05	11%	6 Jun →
ancient	10–13	0.01	23%	6 Jun →
cache	8–13	-0.04	18%	25 May →
cache	13–5	0.06	24%	24 May →
cache	11–13	-0.03	10%	23 May →
cache	7–13	-0.00	20%	21 May →
cache	13–11	-0.04	18%	21 May →
cache	13–8	-0.02	14%	16 May →
mirage	10–13	-0.06	24%	13 May →
dust2	7–13	0.04	16%	13 May →
inferno	16–13	0.00	17%	12 May →
overpass	13–5	0.03	28%	12 May →
cache	3–13	-0.01	13%	9 May →