aksel — CS2 Stats

NO76561197989298512[U:1:29032784]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,127Tracked matches60%Win rate2020Tracked since

4,465Hours in CS6Hrs last 2 wks

CSDB Rating7.5 StrongEntry Fragger

Premier CS Rating24,308Top 25% of 29,473 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~3.8% of ranked players (population est.)

CSDB Leaderboard#7107 of 44758 tracked

FaceitLevel 9 · 1,829 ELOTop 20.7% of ranked FACEIT players

WingmanThe Global Elite

Ladder ranks via Leetify

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 24,308 +370 28 Aug – 30 Aug · 2 observations

Faceit ELO: 1,829 +0 28 Aug – 30 Aug · 2 observations

24,308Peak Premier on CSDB

1,829Peak Faceit ELO on CSDB

2Days observed since 2026-08-28

Faceit ELO

At peak — 1,829
Next: Level 10 at 2,001 — 172 to go
Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
Level 9 first seen 2026-08-28
Level 8 first seen 2026-08-28

Premier CS Rating

At peak — 24,308
Next: Red band at 25,000 — 692 to go
Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
Pink band first seen 2026-08-28
Purple band first seen 2026-08-28

CSDB's own observations — this history builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 9 among CSDB-tracked players (n=1,892), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

Metric	This player	Level 9 median	Level 10 median	vs Level 10
Headshot rate	50.5%	48.5%	51.9%	1.4% short
Shot accuracy	17.0%	13.3%	13.7%	above
Kill/death ratio	1.12	1.07	1.08	above
Match win rate	47.8%	47.0%	48.7%	meets

This profile matches the typical Level 10 player on 3 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Headshot rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 10 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim87

Positioning69

Utility56

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

HOT49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWWLWWLWWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · -0.04 avg rating

Player DNA

Primary style: Entry Fragger — High opening-fight frequency with above-par success in them.

Aim8.7

Aggression10.0

Utility5.6

Positioning6.9

Opening Duels6.2

Clutch2.6

Sharp aimer

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

Your pro match

Plays most like s1mple 92% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-fight frequency, positioning profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Aim. Aim score of 87 — the mechanical foundation is a clear strength.

CT openings. 62% CT opening-duel success — winning the first fight on the defending side is rare and valuable.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 570ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.7

Positioning6.9

Utility5.6

Mechanics7.2

Opening Duels6.2

Win Impact8.3

Composite 7.5/10 (Strong), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.03+0.02

first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.03

Reaction time582ms−16ms

first ⅓ avg 597ms → last ⅓ avg 582ms

Headshot accuracy26.2%−2.1%

first ⅓ avg 28.3% → last ⅓ avg 26.2%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Highlights

0.31Best rating — nuke 13–2

13–0Biggest win — mirage

4Longest win streak

W2Current streak

8–6In matches decided by ≤2 rounds

10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 67% over 9mirageWeakest map · 36% over 11

Map	Grade	Played	Record	Win rate	Avg rating
dust2	B	29	13–16	45%	0.02
cache	B	28	15–13	54%	-0.00
inferno	A	12	7–5	58%	-0.01
mirage	C	11	4–7	36%	-0.00
nuke	S	9	6–3	67%	0.08
overpass	C	5	2–3	40%	-0.03
cache_b	—	2	1–1	50%	0.05
poseidon	—	2	0–2	0%	0.10
ancient	—	1	1–0	100%	0.09
sanctum	—	1	0–1	0%	0.08

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (36% over 11). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

178,121Lifetime kills

1.12K/D · Top 50% of Level 9 players

6,944Matches

47.8%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 9 players

50.5%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 9 players

17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 9 players

18,996MVPs

3,089Hours (in match)

11,022Bombs planted

2,853Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4750,669

AWP32,211

M4A4 / M4A1-S24,190

Desert Eagle14,478

P2000 / USP-S14,126

P2508,145

Glock-187,031

SSG 084,558

Five-SeveN2,667

Knife2,026

Lifetime map wins

20,073dust2

11,431inferno

4,179nuke

2,030cbble

1,775train

139vertigo

129office

66lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

502Matches

54%Win rate

1.22Avg K/D

81.6ADR

41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win

25%1v2 clutch win

7Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWLW

Map	Matches	Win rate	Avg K/D	Avg kills
Mirage	16	50%	1.09	15.1
Inferno	9	56%	1.27	13.9
Overpass	7	43%	1.14	15.6
Dust2	3	100%	1.68	21.7
Anubis	2	100%	1.36	21.0
Ancient	2	50%	1.14	13.0
Nuke	1	100%	0.57	8.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

24.1%Headshot accuracy

35.7%Accuracy (enemy spotted)

40.0%Spray accuracy

82.3%Counter-strafing

7.5°Preaim

570msReaction time

47.7%T opening success

61.7%CT opening success

0.63Enemies flashed / flash

2.3%Flash assists

12.07HE damage / grenade

6.24Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

36% win rate across 11 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

Map	Score	Rating	HS%	Date
inferno	13–8	0.01	18%	29 Aug →
nuke	13–8	-0.02	18%	27 Aug →
dust2	2–13	-0.06	43%	27 Aug →
dust2	13–7	-0.01	29%	26 Aug →
cache	13–6	0.01	17%	26 Aug →
dust2	10–13	0.10	23%	24 Aug →
inferno	13–11	-0.01	14%	22 Aug →
dust2	13–4	0.05	30%	22 Aug →
dust2	16–12	-0.02	19%	9 Aug →
mirage	10–13	-0.00	30%	8 Aug →
ancient	13–2	0.09	3%	8 Aug →
nuke	13–10	0.11	27%	6 Aug →
dust2	10–13	-0.00	19%	6 Aug →
nuke	13–7	0.07	16%	31 Jul →
inferno	2–1	-0.05	100%	26 Jul →
cache	13–7	-0.03	29%	26 Jul →
inferno	7–13	0.04	11%	21 Jul →
cache	13–11	0.04	17%	20 Jul →
cache	16–13	0.13	20%	18 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.08	38%	18 Jul →
nuke	13–2	0.31	30%	18 Jul →
cache	16–14	0.07	21%	18 Jul →
dust2	8–13	-0.01	27%	18 Jul →
mirage	3–13	0.00	33%	18 Jul →
dust2	13–11	0.08	46%	15 Jul →
dust2	1–13	-0.05	10%	12 Jul →
dust2	13–2	0.15	38%	12 Jul →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	27%	11 Jul →
nuke	13–10	0.02	34%	11 Jul →
cache	14–16	0.02	13%	10 Jul →
dust2	13–8	-0.01	20%	10 Jul →
mirage	13–6	0.06	24%	10 Jul →
dust2	3–13	-0.02	20%	10 Jul →
inferno	13–2	0.00	20%	10 Jul →
nuke	15–15	-0.02	50%	9 Jul →
mirage	3–13	-0.03	17%	9 Jul →
dust2	13–3	0.01	19%	9 Jul →
mirage	13–0	-0.01	18%	9 Jul →
dust2	6–13	0.01	34%	9 Jul →
cache	13–10	-0.01	16%	8 Jul →
nuke	4–13	0.07	26%	5 Jul →
dust2	5–13	0.01	23%	5 Jul →
cache	5–13	-0.05	22%	26 Jun →
dust2	10–13	-0.01	15%	14 Jun →
mirage	13–9	0.05	25%	9 Jun →
inferno	16–13	-0.02	4%	7 Jun →
cache	3–13	-0.08	0%	4 Jun →
cache	4–13	-0.06	25%	4 Jun →
cache	2–13	-0.04	8%	30 May →
cache	12–12	-0.05	32%	25 May →
cache	3–13	-0.02	44%	25 May →
cache	6–13	0.04	32%	21 May →
cache	13–11	0.03	43%	14 May →
cache	5–13	-0.05	28%	14 May →
cache	13–4	0.02	15%	11 May →
cache	11–13	-0.04	10%	11 May →
cache	13–6	-0.00	50%	10 May →
cache	6–13	-0.02	24%	10 May →
cache	3–13	0.02	21%	9 May →
cache	13–8	-0.00	25%	9 May →
cache	13–10	0.01	28%	8 May →
cache	7–13	-0.04	18%	8 May →
cache	13–10	0.02	30%	8 May →
cache	13–11	0.04	25%	8 May →
cache	13–11	0.01	14%	4 May →
cache	13–6	0.01	28%	4 May →
overpass	11–13	-0.01	22%	25 Apr →
mirage	3–13	-0.01	19%	23 Apr →
dust2	10–13	-0.02	31%	23 Apr →
cache_b	13–6	0.06	25%	23 Apr →
mirage	6–13	-0.02	9%	23 Apr →
dust2	7–13	0.03	27%	22 Apr →
dust2	13–7	0.08	33%	22 Apr →
mirage	13–10	0.05	16%	22 Apr →
dust2	13–1	0.02	23%	22 Apr →
overpass	6–13	0.01	25%	22 Apr →
dust2	13–10	0.01	21%	21 Apr →
dust2	10–13	0.07	26%	21 Apr →
poseidon	7–9	-0.00	27%	21 Apr →
poseidon	8–8	0.20	13%	21 Apr →
mirage	14–16	-0.01	32%	20 Apr →
dust2	13–5	-0.01	23%	20 Apr →
inferno	16–13	-0.00	23%	20 Apr →
dust2	16–14	-0.02	18%	20 Apr →
inferno	4–13	-0.02	19%	14 Apr →
inferno	13–7	-0.04	11%	11 Apr →
overpass	13–9	-0.01	21%	11 Apr →
inferno	8–13	-0.04	20%	8 Apr →
mirage	5–13	-0.10	30%	8 Apr →
overpass	5–13	-0.07	33%	8 Apr →
dust2	13–4	0.06	65%	4 Apr →
nuke	13–1	0.04	32%	4 Apr →
inferno	9–13	-0.01	45%	31 Mar →
dust2	15–15	0.03	26%	31 Mar →
cache_b	9–13	0.05	38%	28 Mar →
overpass	13–9	-0.05	25%	26 Mar →
dust2	10–13	0.02	41%	26 Mar →
sanctum	6–9	0.08	53%	25 Mar →
nuke	6–9	0.11	39%	25 Mar →
inferno	9–5	0.03	43%	25 Mar →