MaYbAtch

MaYbAtch — CS2 Stats

FI76561197985902073[U:1:25636345]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

4,343Tracked matches50%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.1 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating14,116Blue band · top ~33.1% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 6 Oct 2026 (7 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 14,116 -4,400 1 Jul – 6 Oct · 33 days played
12,38418,711peak 18,7111 Jul6 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,044 +0 30 Aug – 30 Sept · 7 observations
1,0441,044peak 1,04430 Aug30 Sept
19,065Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,044Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
38Days played since 2026-07-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,044
  • 0 over 30 days · steady
  • Next: Level 5 at 1,051 — 7 to go
  • Reached: Level 4 · Level 3 · Level 2
  • Level 4 first seen 2026-08-30
  • Level 3 first seen 2026-08-30

Premier CS Rating

  • 4,595 below peak (18,711)
  • -175 over 30 days · steady
  • -2,860 over 90 days
  • Next: Purple band at 15,000 — 884 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-30
  • Light Blue band first seen 2026-08-30

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGMaYbAtchPREMIER14,116 · Blue band30 DAYS0 ELOPEAK ELO1,044csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim85
Positioning59
Utility41

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–53–2Last 10045%Win rateWWWLLWLLWW

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · +0.01 avg rating · −1.7pp headshot accuracy · +27ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 3–2 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 565ms

Last 20

  • 12–8 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+2 against its own average).

Aim8.5
Utility4.1
Positioning5.9
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch2.4

Sharp aimerStrong CT-side openerEffective flashesLimited utility dependence

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ropz

Plays most like ropz 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: opening-duel success, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

T-side openings. Opening success drops from 57% on CT to 38% on T — the same duels are being taken with worse setups on the attacking side.

Reaction time. 566ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim8.5
Positioning5.9
Utility4.1
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact5.0

Composite 6.1/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.95 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time573ms−14ms
first ⅓ avg 587ms → last ⅓ avg 573ms
Headshot accuracy22.4%−4.3%
first ⅓ avg 26.8% → last ⅓ avg 22.4%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 15–15 · dust2, 9 Jul →
69%Best headshot accuracy · 13–8 · nuke, 19 Jul →
391msFastest reaction time · 13–1 · dust2, 27 Sept →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 27 Sept →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–14In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
10Overtime games

Map breakdown

nukeBest map · 63% over 19dust2Weakest map · 22% over 9
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoC249–1538%-0.01
nukeA1912–763%-0.00
cacheB168–850%0.01
ancientB157–847%0.01
anubisB126–650%0.01
dust2D92–722%0.00
mirage—41–325%0.01
vertigo—10–10%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (22% over 9). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

73Matches
59%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
77.6ADR
47%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

32%1v1 clutch win
22%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno1765%1.0515.7
Nuke1753%1.2317.1
Anubis1547%1.0714.9
Ancient1369%1.0316.0
Overpass450%0.8512.3
Vertigo450%0.7813.5
Cache2100%1.2520.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

21.7%Headshot accuracy
37.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.6%Spray accuracy
84.8%Counter-strafing
8.3°Preaim
566msReaction time
37.5%T opening success
57.4%CT opening success
0.73Enemies flashed / flash
11.0%Flash assists
6.08HE damage / grenade
0.85Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Grenades & Utility

    You are buying and holding utility rather than using it. Unthrown flashes are wasted money every round.

    Flashes per match 0.8462 — below the 4 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
  2. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 37.5457% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

22% win rate across 9 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
nuke13–9-0.0617%11 Oct →
inferno13–7-0.0226%6 Oct →
cache13–100.0825%6 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0026%6 Oct →
inferno7–13-0.0430%4 Oct →
nuke13–60.0736%1 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0114%1 Oct →
mirage11–130.0321%1 Oct →
anubis16–140.0119%1 Oct →
inferno13–80.0421%30 Sept →
dust213–60.0227%27 Sept →
dust213–10.0450%27 Sept →
ancient13–9-0.0316%27 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0329%27 Sept →
cache11–130.0333%26 Sept →
cache8–13-0.0021%16 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0216%16 Sept →
anubis13–60.0118%16 Sept →
ancient13–70.0315%15 Sept →
nuke13–9-0.0127%15 Sept →
inferno7–130.0215%15 Sept →
nuke8–13-0.0714%13 Sept →
inferno13–6-0.0512%13 Sept →
inferno3–13-0.120%8 Sept →
nuke13–10-0.0123%8 Sept →
cache11–13-0.0030%8 Sept →
ancient3–130.0123%8 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0624%8 Sept →
ancient11–13-0.0812%30 Aug →
ancient13–100.0219%30 Aug →
vertigo8–13-0.0415%30 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0832%28 Aug →
inferno15–15-0.0536%28 Aug →
anubis4–130.0134%28 Aug →
dust25–130.0238%24 Aug →
inferno13–10-0.0131%23 Aug →
nuke13–70.0019%23 Aug →
nuke13–60.0312%17 Aug →
cache13–50.0933%17 Aug →
anubis13–100.0215%17 Aug →
anubis13–110.0325%17 Aug →
dust24–13-0.1012%16 Aug →
inferno9–130.0538%15 Aug →
anubis13–80.0530%15 Aug →
cache13–100.0039%15 Aug →
inferno16–140.0631%15 Aug →
ancient2–13-0.0240%12 Aug →
mirage13–90.0124%12 Aug →
ancient9–13-0.0548%3 Aug →
cache9–13-0.0442%3 Aug →
nuke11–130.0141%3 Aug →
cache13–30.0161%26 Jul →
ancient13–10.0332%21 Jul →
nuke13–8-0.0169%19 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0543%19 Jul →
inferno13–10-0.0437%19 Jul →
nuke14–160.0238%16 Jul →
ancient13–70.0349%15 Jul →
nuke13–3-0.0139%15 Jul →
nuke13–110.0131%15 Jul →
dust210–130.0731%15 Jul →
anubis5–130.0537%15 Jul →
inferno16–13-0.0441%14 Jul →
ancient13–80.0537%14 Jul →
anubis9–13-0.0412%14 Jul →
inferno5–13-0.0225%13 Jul →
cache13–9-0.0033%13 Jul →
ancient10–130.0345%12 Jul →
inferno11–13-0.0529%11 Jul →
nuke11–13-0.0228%11 Jul →
inferno10–13-0.0441%11 Jul →
inferno7–130.0123%11 Jul →
ancient13–90.0624%11 Jul →
cache11–130.0331%11 Jul →
inferno13–160.0120%10 Jul →
inferno9–130.0026%9 Jul →
cache13–6-0.0232%9 Jul →
cache5–130.0920%9 Jul →
dust215–150.1216%9 Jul →
inferno6–130.0337%9 Jul →
cache14–16-0.0326%9 Jul →
nuke13–60.0626%9 Jul →
dust214–160.0019%9 Jul →
nuke13–60.0427%8 Jul →
cache13–110.0247%6 Jul →
ancient9–130.0545%6 Jul →
inferno6–130.0328%5 Jul →
dust23–13-0.0716%5 Jul →
anubis6–130.0617%4 Jul →
nuke10–13-0.0119%4 Jul →
inferno13–70.0623%4 Jul →
dust27–13-0.0832%4 Jul →
inferno9–130.0623%4 Jul →
anubis10–13-0.0230%3 Jul →
nuke12–16-0.0222%3 Jul →
nuke13–100.0225%3 Jul →
inferno13–9-0.0124%2 Jul →
anubis13–10-0.0120%2 Jul →
ancient11–13-0.0130%2 Jul →
anubis7–130.0115%1 Jul →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.