Ruttu

Ruttu — CS2 Stats

FI76561198038200141[U:1:77934413]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

3,890Tracked matches59%Win rate2020Tracked since
CSDB Rating5.9 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating20,009Top 50% of 185,711 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~8.5% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#74456 of 230583 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,790 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
WingmanMaster Guardian Elite
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 19 Sep 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 30 days played since 26 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 20,009 +2,269 26 Jul19 Sept · 28 days played
16,48720,009peak 20,00926 Jul19 Sept
Faceit ELO: 1,790 +0 29 Aug30 Aug · 2 observations
1,7901,790peak 1,79029 Aug30 Aug
20,117Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,790Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
30Days played since 2026-07-26

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,790
  • Next: Level 10 at 2,001 211 to go
  • Reached: Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7 · Level 6
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 8 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 20,009
  • +1,770 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 4,991 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-29
  • Blue band first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGRuttuFACEITLevel 8 · 1,790 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER20,009 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,790csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim56
Positioning63
Utility57

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY51481Last 10051%Win rateLWWLLWWWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −0.3pp headshot accuracy · +93ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 26%
  • Avg reaction 647ms

Last 10

  • 64 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 645ms

Last 20

  • 1361 · 65% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional PlayerPositioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.3 against its own average).

Aim5.6
Utility5.7
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.4
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 74% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 58% on T to 43% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 593ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Counter-strafing. Only 69% of shots are taken properly stopped — moving-shot inaccuracy is quietly taxing every duel.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.6
Positioning6.3
Utility5.7
Mechanics4.3
Opening Duels5.1
Win Impact7.9

Composite 5.9/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.00−0.00
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.00
Reaction time597ms−41ms
first ⅓ avg 639ms → last ⅓ avg 597ms
Headshot accuracy18.7%+0.6%
first ⅓ avg 18.1% → last ⅓ avg 18.7%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–4 · nuke, 2 Aug
42%Best headshot accuracy · 10–13 · cache, 19 Sept
430msFastest reaction time · 13–10 · inferno, 15 Sept
13–0Biggest win · cache, 31 Jul

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
615In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
12Overtime games

Map breakdown

cacheBest map · 70% over 10mirageWeakest map · 43% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
infernoB26141254%0.01
nukeA22121055%0.02
anubisB157847%-0.01
ancientB147750%0.00
cacheS107370%0.02
mirageC73443%0.00
dust241325%-0.03
vertigo2020%-0.04

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (43% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

444Matches
54%Win rate
1.02Avg K/D
72.0ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
21%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLWWL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Inferno8756%1.0715.3
Nuke5657%1.1115.1
Mirage5342%0.8112.5
Anubis5358%0.9814.5
Dust24556%0.9013.5
Ancient4457%1.0014.4
Overpass1145%1.0415.6
Vertigo838%1.3117.6

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.9%Headshot accuracy
32.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
32.0%Spray accuracy
69.1%Counter-strafing
9.6°Preaim
593msReaction time
58.1%T opening success
42.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
4.8%Flash assists
11.62HE damage / grenade
8.29Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

43% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache10–130.0142%19 Sept
anubis16–14-0.0320%19 Sept
ancient13–110.0214%19 Sept
anubis2–13-0.0522%19 Sept
nuke11–130.0232%18 Sept
nuke13–1-0.019%18 Sept
inferno13–9-0.006%18 Sept
cache13–10-0.0713%18 Sept
nuke11–130.0517%17 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0113%17 Sept
cache8–130.0115%16 Sept
ancient11–13-0.0115%16 Sept
anubis13–6-0.0120%16 Sept
ancient13–11-0.0215%16 Sept
inferno13–10-0.0425%15 Sept
anubis15–150.0223%15 Sept
ancient13–70.1320%15 Sept
inferno13–90.0622%13 Sept
nuke13–7-0.0218%13 Sept
inferno13–100.0018%13 Sept
nuke8–130.0022%13 Sept
inferno13–60.0115%13 Sept
nuke16–130.0437%12 Sept
inferno12–16-0.0313%12 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0211%12 Sept
inferno13–10.1320%12 Sept
inferno1–13-0.0817%12 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0110%11 Sept
inferno3–13-0.0118%8 Sept
nuke13–100.0113%8 Sept
cache11–130.0227%8 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0220%8 Sept
nuke13–11-0.0018%8 Sept
inferno13–100.0418%7 Sept
anubis10–13-0.0510%5 Sept
inferno13–100.0115%5 Sept
anubis6–130.0229%2 Sept
ancient16–130.0115%2 Sept
anubis13–90.035%2 Sept
dust211–13-0.0527%30 Aug
ancient11–130.0111%30 Aug
ancient13–100.0219%30 Aug
vertigo8–13-0.0219%30 Aug
cache16–120.0220%29 Aug
anubis10–130.0612%29 Aug
mirage8–130.0215%25 Aug
nuke14–160.0714%24 Aug
ancient4–13-0.0314%24 Aug
dust213–70.039%24 Aug
ancient13–50.0426%24 Aug
mirage11–130.0019%24 Aug
inferno6–13-0.0428%24 Aug
dust25–13-0.0225%24 Aug
ancient6–13-0.0427%23 Aug
ancient13–9-0.049%23 Aug
inferno13–80.0830%23 Aug
nuke7–130.0516%23 Aug
inferno13–100.0231%23 Aug
nuke13–7-0.0413%23 Aug
inferno3–13-0.0426%20 Aug
nuke9–130.0224%19 Aug
nuke13–80.1021%18 Aug
nuke13–50.0115%18 Aug
nuke8–13-0.0117%18 Aug
nuke13–6-0.0512%17 Aug
cache13–5-0.0021%17 Aug
anubis13–10-0.0416%17 Aug
anubis13–110.018%17 Aug
inferno13–30.0415%17 Aug
inferno13–50.0518%17 Aug
ancient2–13-0.0723%12 Aug
mirage13–90.0020%12 Aug
nuke9–13-0.0517%12 Aug
mirage11–130.0222%11 Aug
cache13–70.0410%11 Aug
inferno14–16-0.0613%11 Aug
ancient14–16-0.0111%11 Aug
nuke11–13-0.0031%11 Aug
inferno9–130.1221%6 Aug
vertigo14–16-0.0512%6 Aug
nuke10–13-0.0721%2 Aug
mirage13–50.0230%2 Aug
nuke13–80.0818%2 Aug
mirage13–5-0.0217%2 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0114%2 Aug
inferno10–130.0314%2 Aug
ancient5–13-0.0211%2 Aug
nuke13–40.1421%2 Aug
inferno13–100.0825%2 Aug
nuke13–90.0333%31 Jul
anubis16–120.0215%31 Jul
cache13–00.1329%31 Jul
inferno11–13-0.0215%31 Jul
cache16–140.0417%30 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0612%30 Jul
dust27–13-0.0710%30 Jul
anubis11–13-0.0325%28 Jul
cache13–70.0128%28 Jul
mirage10–13-0.0416%27 Jul
inferno8–13-0.077%26 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →