attax

attax — CS2 Stats

FI76561197984429890[U:1:24164162]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

1,352Tracked matches40%Win rate2020Tracked since
4,342Hours in CS12Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.0 SolidSupport
FaceitLevel 8 · 2,092 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 20 Sep 2026 (3 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

0Faceit ELO · 2,092 → 2,092
+7Tracked matches · now 1,352
+3.3ppWin rate · 36.7% → 40.0%
Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 50 days played since 1 Feb 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 21,500 -226 1 Feb2 Jul · 25 days played
21,50023,480peak 23,4801 Feb2 Jul
Faceit ELO: 2,092 +0 29 Aug20 Sept · 5 observations
2,0922,092peak 2,09229 Aug20 Sept
23,480Peak Premier in tracked matches
2,092Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
50Days played since 2026-02-01

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,092
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 408 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-08-29
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-08-29

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

MetricLast 30Previous 30Change
Matches45
Win rate42%
K/D0.82
Headshot %43%

Measured 29 Aug 202623 Sep 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 8 among CSDB-tracked players (n=13,860), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 8 medianLevel 9 medianvs Level 9
Headshot rate47.1%46.8%48.3%1.2% short
Shot accuracy15.8%13.0%13.2%above
Kill/death ratio1.031.061.070.04 short
Match win rate44.1%46.3%46.9%2.8% short

This profile matches the typical Level 9 player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Level 9 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGattaxFACEITLevel 8 · 2,092 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPEAK ELO2,092csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim72
Positioning58
Utility70

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY42553Last 10042%Win rateWWLLWLLWWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: 0pp win rate · −0.02 avg rating · −3.7pp headshot accuracy · −42ms reaction

Win rate 0pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 32 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 519ms

Last 10

  • 55 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 523ms

Last 20

  • 1010 · 50% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 18%
  • Avg reaction 544ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.2
Utility7.0
Positioning5.8
Opening Duels4.5
Clutch4.2

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

jL

Plays most like jL 83% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 559ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.2
Positioning5.8
Utility7.0
Mechanics7.5
Opening Duels3.5
Win Impact1.7

Composite 6.0/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time564ms+11ms
first ⅓ avg 553ms → last ⅓ avg 564ms
Headshot accuracy18.0%−1.8%
first ⅓ avg 19.8% → last ⅓ avg 18.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.12Best match rating · 13–2 · ancient, 2 Feb
37%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · ancient, 20 Feb
422msFastest reaction time · 4–13 · ancient, 24 Jun
13–2Biggest win · ancient, 2 Feb

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

4Longest win streak
W2Current streak
106In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
18Overtime games

Map breakdown

infernoBest map · 75% over 8overpassWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
ancientA2112957%0.01
mirageD1551033%-0.00
dust2C156940%0.01
nukeD1551033%-0.02
anubisD123925%0.00
cacheB84450%0.03
infernoS86275%0.00
overpassD51420%-0.02
train1010%0.01

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Overpass is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Overpass lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

110,934Lifetime kills
1.03K/D
5,343Matches
44.1%Match win rate
47.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 8 players
15.8%Shot accuracy · Top 50% of Level 8 players
13,266MVPs
2,418Hours (in match)
5,234Bombs planted
1,086Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4736,420
AWP11,504
UMP-452,505
P2502,325
MP92,245

Lifetime map wins

6,767inferno
5,314dust2
4,048nuke
2,930train
2,626cbble
450vertigo
74office
60lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

1,590Matches
51%Win rate
1.07Avg K/D
80.3ADR
45%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

41%1v1 clutch win
18%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWWWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Mirage13544%1.0014.6
Nuke9658%1.0216.5
Ancient7951%1.1715.8
Dust24764%1.0915.7
Anubis4751%1.0215.7
Inferno3554%1.1316.6
Cache2850%0.9214.5
Overpass1753%1.2417.5

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.8%Headshot accuracy
36.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
37.9%Spray accuracy
83.8%Counter-strafing
11.7°Preaim
559msReaction time
40.0%T opening success
47.7%CT opening success
0.63Enemies flashed / flash
13.1%Flash assists
9.72HE damage / grenade
8.76Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.9969% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Overpass

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Overpass callouts & strategyOverpass grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache13–4-0.0221%22 Sept
mirage13–10-0.0618%22 Sept
anubis8–13-0.0413%11 Sept
anubis5–13-0.0215%3 Sept
mirage16–140.0419%1 Sept
dust27–13-0.0413%31 Aug
anubis10–13-0.0117%31 Aug
nuke13–80.0612%31 Aug
ancient13–100.0321%26 Aug
anubis9–13-0.0212%23 Aug
dust213–70.0616%23 Aug
anubis13–50.0418%19 Aug
ancient10–13-0.0511%19 Aug
nuke7–13-0.0028%19 Aug
dust213–70.1026%18 Aug
cache13–70.0829%9 Jul
inferno10–130.0320%2 Jul
ancient16–140.0122%24 Jun
ancient4–13-0.0513%24 Jun
dust26–13-0.0515%18 Jun
nuke7–13-0.058%18 Jun
mirage10–130.0015%15 Jun
cache9–130.0119%12 Jun
nuke4–13-0.0615%6 Jun
mirage5–13-0.0621%6 Jun
nuke3–13-0.0520%6 Jun
anubis13–110.0320%4 Jun
ancient8–130.0123%4 Jun
nuke13–80.0415%4 Jun
anubis6–13-0.0020%26 May
dust216–13-0.0321%22 May
anubis3–13-0.0321%22 May
ancient16–140.0420%22 May
overpass4–13-0.0611%21 May
mirage4–13-0.0219%21 May
nuke13–16-0.0219%19 May
nuke1–13-0.110%19 May
ancient13–30.0121%17 May
dust27–13-0.0421%17 May
mirage13–110.0412%17 May
cache8–13-0.0419%17 May
ancient13–9-0.0614%15 May
nuke10–130.0120%15 May
cache9–130.0129%15 May
cache13–60.0824%6 May
nuke13–5-0.0514%6 May
ancient16–13-0.0120%5 May
cache13–60.1128%5 May
dust28–130.0335%4 May
cache9–130.0417%4 May
dust27–13-0.0315%26 Apr
ancient14–16-0.0424%22 Apr
mirage15–150.0015%20 Apr
inferno13–5-0.0724%18 Apr
overpass7–13-0.0523%18 Apr
ancient13–50.0121%18 Apr
nuke16–140.0017%16 Apr
anubis14–16-0.0321%16 Apr
dust213–16-0.0030%8 Apr
mirage13–60.0411%5 Apr
ancient13–16-0.0212%5 Apr
ancient3–13-0.037%29 Mar
dust215–15-0.0120%27 Mar
ancient16–140.0825%27 Mar
dust213–100.0925%24 Mar
overpass9–130.0620%24 Mar
ancient13–110.0617%22 Mar
nuke3–13-0.0628%21 Mar
ancient16–130.0419%21 Mar
dust216–130.0223%14 Mar
overpass9–13-0.0315%1 Mar
dust213–11-0.0417%25 Feb
nuke13–110.0013%25 Feb
mirage12–120.0313%25 Feb
train11–130.0125%25 Feb
mirage10–13-0.0615%23 Feb
ancient5–13-0.0337%20 Feb
inferno13–60.0317%20 Feb
nuke6–13-0.0213%20 Feb
inferno13–50.0824%18 Feb
inferno5–13-0.0415%13 Feb
ancient13–60.0114%13 Feb
inferno13–5-0.0721%13 Feb
mirage11–13-0.0311%13 Feb
mirage6–13-0.0323%9 Feb
dust210–13-0.0417%9 Feb
anubis13–60.0815%9 Feb
mirage7–130.0221%8 Feb
ancient7–130.0123%8 Feb
anubis6–13-0.0420%8 Feb
inferno13–90.0629%8 Feb
ancient10–130.0014%6 Feb
overpass13–8-0.0119%6 Feb
inferno13–60.0124%2 Feb
mirage13–70.0528%2 Feb
ancient13–20.1228%2 Feb
nuke11–130.0520%2 Feb
dust211–130.0719%1 Feb
anubis12–160.0418%1 Feb
mirage13–160.0216%1 Feb

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

2K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →