levinontour

levinontour — CS2 Stats

DE76561197981836984[U:1:21571256]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,156Tracked matches47%Win rate2020Tracked since
2,870Hours in CS
CSDB Rating5.4 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 10 · 2,197 ELOTop 12.4% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 1 Sep 2026 (31 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then — still 2,156 tracked matches. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

2,197Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
48Days played since 2025-01-12

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 2,197
  • Next: 2,500 ELO at 2,500 — 303 to go
  • Reached: Level 10 · Level 9 · Level 8 · Level 7
  • Level 10 first seen 2026-09-01
  • Level 9 first seen 2026-09-01

Premier is CSDB’s own observation — it builds from the day a profile is first viewed and cannot be backfilled. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Compare periods

Last 30 days vs previous 30

No matches recorded between 1 Sep 2026 and 2 Oct 2026.

Measured 1 Sep 2026 → 2 Oct 2026; no observation near 60 days ago, so there is no previous window yet.

Differences between Valve's lifetime totals on the days CSDB observed this profile — every mode Valve counts, not only ranked. A window appears only when an observation sits within a few days of each end.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 10 among CSDB-tracked players (n=29,274), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 10 median
Headshot rate52.4%50.9%
Shot accuracy17.0%13.8%
Kill/death ratio0.981.09
Match win rate49.1%48.4%

Share this profile

CSDB.GGlevinontourFACEITLevel 10 · 2,197 ELOSTANDINGTop 12.4% of rankedPEAK ELO2,197csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim70
Positioning53
Utility36

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY47–53Last 10047%Win rateWWWLWLLWLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · +0.02 avg rating · +3.2pp headshot accuracy · −48ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 4–1 · 80% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 29%
  • Avg reaction 594ms

Last 10

  • 6–4 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 24%
  • Avg reaction 599ms

Last 20

  • 11–9 · 55% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 22%
  • Avg reaction 622ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim7.0
Utility3.6
Positioning5.3
Opening Duels3.2
Clutch2.6

Strong T-side openerEffective flashes

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

iM

Plays most like iM 94% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower aim profile; lower utility contribution.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

Flashes. 0.77 enemies blinded per flash — utility that consistently lands.

Areas to improve

Utility. Utility contribution runs far behind the mechanical game — the cheapest rating gain on this profile is thrown, not aimed.

Reaction time. 644ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.0
Positioning5.3
Utility3.6
Mechanics7.6
Opening Duels1.6
Win Impact3.9

Composite 5.4/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.01−0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.01
Reaction time632ms+15ms
first ⅓ avg 618ms → last ⅓ avg 632ms
Headshot accuracy21.5%−2.0%
first ⅓ avg 23.6% → last ⅓ avg 21.5%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · mirage, 12 Jan →
50%Best headshot accuracy · 5–13 · train, 21 Mar →
398msFastest reaction time · 13–5 · dust2, 27 Jan →
13–2Biggest win · inferno, 27 Mar →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

5Longest win streak
W3Current streak
5–9In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

dust2Best map · 63% over 35mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2A3522–1363%-0.00
infernoC239–1439%-0.01
nukeB157–847%-0.01
ancientC146–843%0.00
mirageD51–420%0.02
train—41–325%0.00
overpass—21–150%0.02
anubis—20–20%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 5 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

117,558Lifetime kills
0.98K/D
5,022Matches
49.1%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 10 players
52.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 10 players
17.0%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 10 players
14,265MVPs
2,870Hours (in match)
7,894Bombs planted
1,981Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4742,904
AWP7,877
Knife3,302
MAC-101,894
Tec-91,811
P2501,632

Lifetime map wins

13,414inferno
10,268dust2
3,707train
3,172nuke
1,535cbble
1,429vertigo
41assault
28lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

3,167Matches
50%Win rate
1.03Avg K/D
77.3ADR
53%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

33%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
12Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLWLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust223756%1.0215.9
Inferno16852%1.0515.5
Nuke11460%1.0314.8
Ancient11338%0.9415.5
Mirage7745%0.8414.4
Anubis3842%0.9315.8
Overpass2763%1.0215.6
Train2236%0.9313.9

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

22.0%Headshot accuracy
33.0%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.9%Spray accuracy
84.0%Counter-strafing
9.7°Preaim
644msReaction time
39.6%T opening success
33.1%CT opening success
0.77Enemies flashed / flash
9.5%Flash assists
8.43HE damage / grenade
12.18Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    You are losing most of the first duels you take on T side, which is usually a peeking and spacing problem, not aim.

    T opening duels 39.6236% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategy →Mirage grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–110.0237%30 Dec →
dust213–8-0.0325%30 Dec →
overpass13–60.0330%21 Dec →
overpass10–130.0023%20 Dec →
dust213–100.0131%24 Oct →
dust214–16-0.0619%12 Sept →
inferno11–130.0322%23 Aug →
dust213–60.0119%10 Aug →
inferno7–130.0316%9 Aug →
nuke13–8-0.0217%27 Jun →
dust213–80.0321%4 May →
dust213–11-0.0222%4 May →
inferno10–13-0.0226%4 May →
inferno9–13-0.0119%29 Apr →
dust213–90.1222%29 Apr →
inferno13–6-0.0422%26 Apr →
anubis10–130.0114%21 Apr →
dust29–13-0.0913%20 Apr →
ancient4–13-0.1023%20 Apr →
nuke13–7-0.0124%13 Apr →
dust225–220.0119%9 Apr →
anubis1–13-0.048%3 Apr →
ancient11–13-0.0024%3 Apr →
dust210–13-0.0424%3 Apr →
dust213–6-0.0223%1 Apr →
ancient4–130.0421%1 Apr →
dust28–130.0123%1 Apr →
inferno7–130.0128%1 Apr →
ancient13–8-0.0222%1 Apr →
mirage10–130.0322%1 Apr →
ancient11–130.0116%1 Apr →
mirage11–13-0.0227%1 Apr →
inferno7–13-0.0410%31 Mar →
dust220–220.0127%29 Mar →
nuke3–13-0.0629%28 Mar →
inferno13–20.0213%27 Mar →
nuke13–5-0.0540%26 Mar →
dust211–13-0.0230%26 Mar →
dust213–80.0744%24 Mar →
mirage6–13-0.0030%24 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0229%24 Mar →
ancient10–13-0.0323%24 Mar →
dust213–5-0.0033%21 Mar →
train5–13-0.0450%21 Mar →
dust28–13-0.0220%18 Mar →
dust26–13-0.0442%17 Mar →
nuke10–130.0224%17 Mar →
inferno13–16-0.0111%16 Mar →
inferno4–13-0.0613%16 Mar →
nuke8–13-0.1013%16 Mar →
nuke13–30.0019%11 Mar →
inferno19–170.0021%9 Mar →
dust213–11-0.0317%9 Mar →
ancient10–130.0219%24 Feb →
ancient9–130.0317%23 Feb →
nuke13–60.0113%23 Feb →
inferno13–9-0.0311%19 Feb →
dust28–13-0.0036%19 Feb →
nuke19–160.0226%19 Feb →
dust213–60.0132%16 Feb →
ancient19–160.0428%15 Feb →
inferno10–13-0.0118%15 Feb →
train11–13-0.0123%12 Feb →
dust216–130.0133%10 Feb →
inferno1–13-0.0628%10 Feb →
dust27–13-0.0118%9 Feb →
nuke10–13-0.0216%9 Feb →
inferno6–130.0123%8 Feb →
nuke8–130.0020%8 Feb →
mirage9–13-0.0417%8 Feb →
dust213–20.0935%8 Feb →
train13–90.1218%8 Feb →
nuke16–19-0.0419%7 Feb →
dust216–12-0.0232%7 Feb →
dust25–130.0326%7 Feb →
train6–13-0.0517%7 Feb →
inferno13–90.0422%7 Feb →
ancient13–40.0930%7 Feb →
ancient13–10-0.0119%6 Feb →
inferno5–13-0.0324%5 Feb →
nuke13–80.0117%5 Feb →
inferno7–13-0.0828%5 Feb →
dust213–20.0616%5 Feb →
inferno13–2-0.0016%5 Feb →
dust213–5-0.0419%5 Feb →
dust213–4-0.0126%3 Feb →
inferno16–14-0.0019%3 Feb →
ancient11–130.0130%27 Jan →
dust213–50.0324%27 Jan →
inferno1–13-0.0620%27 Jan →
nuke7–130.0033%24 Jan →
dust28–13-0.0115%21 Jan →
dust213–70.0126%21 Jan →
inferno13–70.0227%21 Jan →
nuke8–130.0222%19 Jan →
ancient13–100.0135%19 Jan →
ancient13–10-0.0226%12 Jan →
dust27–12-0.0732%12 Jan →
dust213–80.0218%12 Jan →
mirage13–100.1328%12 Jan →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

Faceit Level 102K ELO1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.