ShaDaK1aN

ShaDaK1aN — CS2 Stats

ES76561197981128619[U:1:20862891]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,219Tracked matches39%Win rate2020Tracked since
8,590Hours in CS4Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.7 DevelopingSupport
Premier CS Rating3,628Grey band · top ~84.6% of ranked players (population est.)
FaceitLevel 2 · 642 ELOTop 97.9% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 2 Nov 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 3,628 -1,259 7 Jun – 2 Nov · 24 days played
3,1665,119peak 5,1197 Jun2 Nov
Faceit ELO: 642 +0 10 Sept – 15 Sept · 2 observations
642642peak 64210 Sept15 Sept
5,119Peak Premier in tracked matches
642Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
46Days played since 2026-06-04

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 642
  • Next: Level 3 at 751 — 109 to go
  • Reached: Level 2
  • Level 2 first seen 2026-09-10

Premier CS Rating

  • 1,491 below peak (5,119)
  • -798 over 30 days · declining
  • Next: Light Blue band at 5,000 — 1,372 to go
  • Reached: Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 2 among CSDB-tracked players (n=6,128), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 2 medianLevel 3 medianvs Level 3
Headshot rate43.1%41.3%41.8%above
Shot accuracy17.7%12.7%12.2%above
Kill/death ratio0.990.950.98meets
Match win rate44.3%42.6%43.3%above

Across every metric we can compare, this profile already matches the typical Level 3 player. Rank still comes from winning matches — this is a performance comparison, not a prediction.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGShaDaK1aNFACEITLevel 2 · 642 ELOSTANDINGTop 97.9% of rankedPREMIER3,628 · Grey bandPEAK ELO642csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning52
Utility53

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY39–56–5Last 10039%Win rateLLWWLLWLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: +10pp win rate · −0.00 avg rating · +0.7pp headshot accuracy · +55ms reaction

Win rate +10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 25%
  • Avg reaction 749ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 20%
  • Avg reaction 692ms

Last 20

  • 7–11–2 · 35% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.02
  • Avg headshot accuracy 19%
  • Avg reaction 664ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Support — Utility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+1.6 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility5.3
Positioning5.2
Opening Duels2.8
Clutch1.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 79% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

Reaction time. 668ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning5.2
Utility5.3
Mechanics7.7
Opening Duels5.6
Win Impact1.4

Composite 4.7/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×0.90 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.03+0.02
first ⅓ avg -0.05 → last ⅓ avg -0.03
Reaction time656ms−72ms
first ⅓ avg 727ms → last ⅓ avg 656ms
Headshot accuracy18.1%+1.7%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 18.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.10Best match rating · 13–3 · dust2, 3 Sept →
67%Best headshot accuracy · 3–1 · cache, 8 Jul →
406msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · dust2, 22 Aug →
13–1Biggest win · dust2, 30 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

7Longest win streak
L2Current streak
5–4In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

mirageBest map · 46% over 13anubisWeakest map · 14% over 7
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2C3816–2242%-0.03
mirageB136–746%-0.01
infernoB136–746%-0.05
cacheD124–833%-0.02
nukeC73–443%-0.01
anubisD71–614%-0.04
ancientC73–443%-0.03
vertigo—20–20%-0.02
overpass—10–10%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Anubis is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (14% over 7). Start with the 6 essential Anubis lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

228,253Lifetime kills
0.99K/D · Top 50% of Level 2 players
14,480Matches
44.3%Match win rate · Top 50% of Level 2 players
43.1%Headshot % · Top 50% of Level 2 players
17.7%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Level 2 players
21,757MVPs
4,853Hours (in match)
9,545Bombs planted
1,334Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

AK-4757,920
AWP38,391
SG 5539,341
AUG7,836
UMP-457,517
FAMAS5,470

Lifetime map wins

47,883dust2
15,648inferno
3,860vertigo
3,437nuke
2,348cbble
1,005train
412safehouse
388lake

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

176Matches
44%Win rate
0.82Avg K/D
71.2ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

27%1v1 clutch win
23%1v2 clutch win
6Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWWLLW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Anubis2548%0.8013.6
Mirage2040%0.7811.3
Inferno1242%0.8413.2
Dust21145%0.8715.6
Nuke729%0.7010.4
Vertigo450%0.8012.0
Ancient30%0.5710.3
Cache10%0.539.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

18.5%Headshot accuracy
28.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
25.1%Spray accuracy
84.9%Counter-strafing
9.3°Preaim
668msReaction time
59.7%T opening success
45.2%CT opening success
0.61Enemies flashed / flash
3.6%Flash assists
9.55HE damage / grenade
8.93Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Spend your practice time on Anubis

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

14% win rate across 7 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Anubis callouts & strategy →Anubis grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
cache7–13-0.0232%2 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0929%30 Oct →
dust213–10.0430%30 Oct →
nuke13–7-0.0216%30 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0617%29 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0617%23 Oct →
cache13–50.0123%23 Oct →
cache5–13-0.0212%18 Oct →
cache13–80.0316%17 Oct →
anubis5–13-0.065%17 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0317%17 Oct →
dust212–120.0335%17 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0125%17 Oct →
anubis4–13-0.0616%16 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0016%16 Oct →
anubis7–13-0.0221%7 Oct →
dust27–13-0.0813%7 Oct →
overpass11–13-0.0219%6 Oct →
mirage13–4-0.0118%6 Oct →
dust21–13-0.0310%6 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0621%6 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0325%6 Oct →
inferno3–13-0.080%6 Oct →
ancient11–13-0.0316%6 Oct →
ancient13–6-0.0924%6 Oct →
cache13–50.000%5 Oct →
mirage9–13-0.0112%4 Oct →
anubis13–90.0120%4 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0423%4 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0611%24 Sept →
dust212–16-0.0420%22 Sept →
dust29–13-0.0220%18 Sept →
anubis1–130.0118%18 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0623%13 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0116%12 Sept →
nuke13–90.1018%12 Sept →
dust213–40.0517%12 Sept →
mirage10–13-0.106%12 Sept →
dust25–13-0.0914%10 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.0117%10 Sept →
dust211–3-0.0410%10 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.0719%9 Sept →
dust210–13-0.0617%9 Sept →
inferno13–10-0.1015%8 Sept →
inferno11–13-0.120%8 Sept →
nuke11–13-0.0121%7 Sept →
dust213–40.0126%6 Sept →
dust213–8-0.0217%6 Sept →
anubis5–13-0.0713%5 Sept →
dust213–6-0.0315%5 Sept →
mirage13–70.0023%5 Sept →
mirage13–11-0.0129%5 Sept →
mirage13–7-0.0013%4 Sept →
dust213–60.0519%4 Sept →
mirage13–20.0818%4 Sept →
inferno13–30.060%4 Sept →
cache5–130.0313%3 Sept →
dust213–30.1014%3 Sept →
ancient13–60.0717%3 Sept →
mirage10–130.0319%3 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.1018%2 Sept →
cache4–13-0.070%1 Sept →
dust213–70.0519%1 Sept →
inferno13–20.0921%1 Sept →
mirage7–13-0.0312%31 Aug →
mirage13–110.0522%31 Aug →
nuke9–13-0.0812%30 Aug →
dust213–8-0.0118%30 Aug →
dust27–13-0.0121%27 Aug →
ancient6–13-0.0710%27 Aug →
mirage5–130.0113%25 Aug →
dust213–4-0.0218%25 Aug →
inferno13–80.0226%24 Aug →
mirage6–13-0.0512%23 Aug →
inferno9–13-0.0618%22 Aug →
nuke10–13-0.0125%22 Aug →
dust213–6-0.0913%22 Aug →
dust213–11-0.0213%22 Aug →
ancient5–13-0.065%21 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0523%5 Aug →
dust24–13-0.126%5 Aug →
mirage7–13-0.0713%2 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0514%2 Aug →
cache5–13-0.0713%2 Aug →
dust26–13-0.068%1 Aug →
dust212–12-0.0533%8 Jul →
cache3–1-0.0767%8 Jul →
cache7–13-0.0617%3 Jul →
inferno6–13-0.0710%24 Jun →
nuke13–30.0112%23 Jun →
dust213–5-0.0322%23 Jun →
dust212–12-0.0615%20 Jun →
dust28–13-0.094%20 Jun →
dust26–13-0.0313%14 Jun →
inferno9–13-0.0519%7 Jun →
inferno13–5-0.085%7 Jun →
inferno13–11-0.1014%7 Jun →
cache7–13-0.015%6 Jun →
vertigo12–12-0.0122%4 Jun →
vertigo2–13-0.0417%4 Jun →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.