coprama

coprama — CS2 Stats

FI76561197980818767[U:1:20553039]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

2,146Tracked matches52%Win rate2023Tracked since
CSDB Rating6.4 SolidPositional Player
Premier CS Rating22,358Top 25% of 204,219 CSDB-tracked playersPink band · top ~5.9% of ranked players (population est.)
CSDB Leaderboard#49818 of 251370 tracked
FaceitLevel 8 · 1,474 ELOTop 31.2% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 12 Oct 2026 (yesterday). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 22,358 +745 13 Aug – 12 Oct · 23 days played
19,99922,358peak 22,35813 Aug12 Oct
Faceit ELO: 1,474 +0 31 Aug – 16 Sept · 3 observations
1,4741,474peak 1,47431 Aug16 Sept
23,283Peak Premier in tracked matches
1,474Highest Faceit ELO seen on CSDB
31Days played since 2026-08-11

Faceit ELO

  • At peak — 1,474
  • Next: Level 8 at 1,531 — 57 to go
  • Reached: Level 7 · Level 6 · Level 5 · Level 4
  • Level 7 first seen 2026-08-31
  • Level 6 first seen 2026-08-31

Premier CS Rating

  • At peak — 22,358
  • +1,296 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Red band at 25,000 — 2,642 to go
  • Reached: Pink band · Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band
  • Pink band first seen 2026-08-31
  • Purple band first seen 2026-08-31

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do. Faceit ELO is CSDB’s own observation — no feed exposes ELO per match, so that line only has the days the profile was viewed and cannot be backfilled.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGcopramaFACEITLevel 8 · 1,474 ELOSTANDINGTop 31.2% of rankedPREMIER22,358 · Pink bandPEAK ELO1,474csdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim75
Positioning63
Utility61

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY49–47–4Last 10049%Win rateWWWWWLTLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −20pp win rate · +0.04 avg rating · +0.8pp headshot accuracy · −36ms reaction

Win rate down 20pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp). Average match rating moved the other way (+0.04), so results shifted more than performance did.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 5–0 · 100% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 499ms

Last 10

  • 6–3–1 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 515ms

Last 20

  • 14–5–1 · 70% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 533ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1.4 against its own average).

Aim7.5
Utility6.1
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels2.7
Clutch4.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

ZywOo

Plays most like ZywOo 90% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, utility contribution.

Where you differ: lower opening-duel success; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim7.5
Positioning6.3
Utility6.1
Mechanics5.6
Opening Duels4.4
Win Impact5.6

Composite 6.4/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.02 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.00−0.02
first ⅓ avg 0.02 → last ⅓ avg -0.00
Reaction time527ms−8ms
first ⅓ avg 535ms → last ⅓ avg 527ms
Headshot accuracy12.0%−0.0%
first ⅓ avg 12.1% → last ⅓ avg 12.0%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.14Best match rating · 13–11 · ancient, 10 Oct →
25%Best headshot accuracy · 8–13 · nuke, 25 Sept →
383msFastest reaction time · 13–6 · inferno, 12 Oct →
13–1Biggest win · ancient, 16 Aug →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
W5Current streak
6–3In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
11Overtime games

Map breakdown

anubisBest map · 67% over 18dust2Weakest map · 13% over 8
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
anubisS1812–667%0.00
cacheC188–1044%-0.01
ancientB179–853%0.01
nukeA169–756%0.01
infernoB136–746%0.01
mirageC104–640%-0.00
dust2D81–713%0.00

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Dust 2 is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (13% over 8). Start with the 6 essential Dust 2 lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Faceit stats

Combat

398Matches
53%Win rate
1.19Avg K/D
81.9ADR
39%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

42%1v1 clutch win
25%1v2 clutch win
11Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Ancient8249%1.0515.7
Inferno6161%1.2917.2
Anubis5553%1.3517.3
Mirage5454%1.1315.4
Nuke4151%1.3917.2
Dust23238%0.9914.1
Overpass3148%1.1115.2
Cache1974%1.2015.7

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

11.7%Headshot accuracy
38.8%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
42.5%Spray accuracy
75.1%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
522msReaction time
54.1%T opening success
41.1%CT opening success
0.46Enemies flashed / flash
9.8%Flash assists
8.52HE damage / grenade
11.23Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Best CS2 Crosshair

    Your shots are landing on bodies more often than heads — usually a crosshair-height and placement habit rather than raw aim.

    Headshot accuracy 11.742% — below the 15% mark we flag

    Aim Training →
  2. Grenades & Utility

    Most of your flashes are blinding nobody. A handful of reliable pop-flash lineups fixes this faster than anything else.

    Enemies flashed per flash 0.4603 — below the 0.5 mark we flag

    Grenade Lineups →
Spend your practice time on Dust 2

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

13% win rate across 8 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Dust 2 callouts & strategy →Dust 2 grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
inferno13–60.0623%12 Oct →
anubis13–90.019%12 Oct →
anubis13–20.055%11 Oct →
cache13–60.0212%11 Oct →
ancient13–110.1414%10 Oct →
ancient8–130.015%8 Oct →
dust215–150.0115%8 Oct →
cache13–16-0.0111%8 Oct →
mirage13–100.0415%8 Oct →
dust213–16-0.0212%8 Oct →
ancient13–11-0.074%8 Oct →
nuke13–10-0.0422%7 Oct →
nuke2–13-0.094%6 Oct →
ancient6–13-0.017%5 Oct →
nuke13–30.0317%5 Oct →
anubis13–9-0.0316%4 Oct →
ancient13–8-0.0510%4 Oct →
nuke16–140.029%3 Oct →
mirage13–100.0415%3 Oct →
nuke13–100.079%29 Sept →
dust22–13-0.0523%29 Sept →
mirage6–13-0.048%29 Sept →
inferno13–3-0.0216%28 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.099%28 Sept →
mirage5–13-0.058%27 Sept →
mirage11–13-0.038%27 Sept →
mirage7–130.0213%27 Sept →
anubis13–16-0.0410%27 Sept →
inferno10–13-0.0613%27 Sept →
nuke7–13-0.0213%27 Sept →
anubis16–130.087%26 Sept →
nuke13–60.0112%26 Sept →
nuke8–130.0025%25 Sept →
dust213–60.0315%21 Sept →
inferno5–13-0.0314%19 Sept →
anubis13–8-0.0514%19 Sept →
anubis13–9-0.044%19 Sept →
cache13–70.037%19 Sept →
cache13–9-0.089%18 Sept →
anubis13–10-0.0324%18 Sept →
anubis13–70.0310%17 Sept →
inferno0–70.036%17 Sept →
nuke12–60.0119%17 Sept →
anubis7–13-0.0114%15 Sept →
cache13–50.0224%15 Sept →
inferno3–130.018%15 Sept →
cache1–13-0.0421%15 Sept →
anubis4–13-0.0413%15 Sept →
anubis15–15-0.067%4 Sept →
ancient13–40.0312%4 Sept →
nuke10–13-0.0317%4 Sept →
anubis3–13-0.038%4 Sept →
ancient13–60.038%2 Sept →
ancient10–13-0.058%2 Sept →
inferno9–13-0.0216%31 Aug →
mirage13–8-0.0422%31 Aug →
dust28–130.0918%30 Aug →
anubis13–110.0016%30 Aug →
dust23–13-0.0420%30 Aug →
inferno13–50.0110%30 Aug →
cache13–110.0422%30 Aug →
inferno13–100.0517%30 Aug →
ancient7–13-0.0115%28 Aug →
inferno13–90.058%28 Aug →
inferno3–13-0.023%28 Aug →
cache6–13-0.045%28 Aug →
nuke13–90.0211%28 Aug →
cache15–150.0710%28 Aug →
nuke13–100.0811%28 Aug →
cache9–13-0.058%28 Aug →
ancient13–100.029%26 Aug →
cache13–50.077%26 Aug →
nuke7–13-0.0210%26 Aug →
anubis13–40.1111%26 Aug →
ancient13–20.116%25 Aug →
mirage4–130.0214%25 Aug →
mirage13–90.0221%25 Aug →
cache6–13-0.0121%25 Aug →
dust26–130.058%25 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0315%23 Aug →
inferno13–50.027%23 Aug →
mirage5–130.0014%23 Aug →
cache9–130.0120%23 Aug →
cache13–10-0.0411%23 Aug →
dust24–13-0.0314%23 Aug →
anubis15–15-0.049%16 Aug →
ancient13–10.068%16 Aug →
ancient7–130.029%15 Aug →
nuke8–20.0718%15 Aug →
ancient10–130.1413%15 Aug →
anubis13–110.069%15 Aug →
cache10–13-0.0311%15 Aug →
cache11–130.0223%15 Aug →
nuke14–16-0.0310%13 Aug →
nuke8–130.0212%13 Aug →
inferno8–130.0410%13 Aug →
ancient8–13-0.0611%13 Aug →
anubis13–90.0110%13 Aug →
cache7–13-0.0912%13 Aug →
ancient16–13-0.0016%11 Aug →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

1,000 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.