LeTarG'K SKINS

LeTarG'K SKINS — CS2 Stats

FR76561197979924576[U:1:19658848]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

181Tracked matches41%Win rate2026Tracked since
770Hours in CS28Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating4.2 DevelopingPositional Player
FaceitLevel 3Top 90.6% of ranked FACEIT players
Ladder ranks via Leetify

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Level 3 among CSDB-tracked players (n=10,505), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerLevel 3 medianLevel 4 medianvs Level 4
Headshot rate68.1%41.8%42.7%above
Shot accuracy9.0%12.2%11.2%2.3% short
Kill/death ratio1.680.980.99above
Match win rate39.6%43.3%43.9%4.4% short

This profile matches the typical Level 4 player on 2 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Shot accuracy. That is the metric furthest from the Level 4 median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGLeTarG'K SKINSFACEITLevel 3STANDINGTop 90.6% of rankedcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim50
Positioning42
Utility37

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY45–43–12Last 10045%Win rateLLLWWWLLWL

Last 10 vs previous 10: −10pp win rate · −0.01 avg rating · −3.6pp headshot accuracy · −7ms reaction

Win rate −10pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — within the normal variation of a 10-match window (±20pp), so no real shift yet.

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 2–3 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.06
  • Avg headshot accuracy 12%
  • Avg reaction 691ms

Last 10

  • 4–6 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.04
  • Avg headshot accuracy 16%
  • Avg reaction 657ms

Last 20

  • 9–11 · 45% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.03
  • Avg headshot accuracy 17%
  • Avg reaction 661ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: Positional Player — Positioning stands above the rest of this profile (+1 against its own average).

Aim5.0
Utility3.7
Positioning4.2
Opening Duels1.6
Clutch3.4

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

Twistzz

Plays most like Twistzz 86% playstyle similarity

Most alike: positioning profile, opening-duel success.

Where you differ: lower utility contribution; lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 52% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Reaction time. 641ms from enemy-visible to first shot leaves fights decided before they start — warmup routines move this number more than anything else.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim5.0
Positioning4.2
Utility3.7
Mechanics4.7
Opening Duels3.6
Win Impact2.1

Composite 4.2/10 (Developing), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating-0.02−0.01
first ⅓ avg -0.01 → last ⅓ avg -0.02
Reaction time649ms+51ms
first ⅓ avg 598ms → last ⅓ avg 649ms
Headshot accuracy17.3%+0.9%
first ⅓ avg 16.4% → last ⅓ avg 17.3%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.13Best match rating · 13–10 · dust2, 6 Oct →
34%Best headshot accuracy · 13–9 · dust2, 20 Oct →
359msFastest reaction time · 8–3 · ancient, 5 Oct →
13–0Biggest win · cache, 11 Oct →

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

6Longest win streak
L3Current streak
7–7In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
1Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 60% over 5infernoWeakest map · 33% over 21
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
mirageB3217–1553%-0.01
dust2B3116–1552%-0.02
infernoD217–1433%-0.02
cacheC52–340%-0.00
ancientA53–260%-0.05
anubis—40–40%-0.05
nuke—20–20%-0.02

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Inferno is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (33% over 21). Start with the 6 essential Inferno lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

24,085Lifetime kills
1.68K/D · Top 5% of Level 3 players
594Matches
39.6%Match win rate
68.1%Headshot % · Top 1% of Level 3 players
9.0%Shot accuracy
1,045MVPs
302Hours (in match)
583Bombs planted
222Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

2,264dust2
1,114inferno
482nuke
85train
21dust
14vertigo
13aztec
10cbble

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

32Matches
50%Win rate
0.90Avg K/D
67.7ADR
46%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

37%1v1 clutch win
10%1v2 clutch win
4Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsLLLWW

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust21145%0.8613.6
Mirage1145%0.8910.0
Inferno667%0.9914.0
Ancient2100%0.9914.0
Nuke10%0.7110.0
Anubis10%0.9314.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

17.5%Headshot accuracy
32.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
35.3%Spray accuracy
71.3%Counter-strafing
10.7°Preaim
641msReaction time
52.2%T opening success
36.9%CT opening success
0.52Enemies flashed / flash
3.2%Flash assists
4.57HE damage / grenade
5.36Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 36.9494% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Inferno

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

33% win rate across 21 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Inferno callouts & strategy →Inferno grenade lineups →

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
dust27–13-0.098%1 Nov →
dust23–13-0.0911%30 Oct →
nuke8–130.018%30 Oct →
dust213–5-0.0624%30 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.079%27 Oct →
mirage13–80.0520%27 Oct →
mirage6–13-0.0218%27 Oct →
dust26–13-0.0316%26 Oct →
mirage13–9-0.0619%26 Oct →
inferno9–13-0.0223%25 Oct →
dust28–1-0.0520%25 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.126%25 Oct →
cache3–130.0211%24 Oct →
dust25–13-0.0531%24 Oct →
mirage13–6-0.0224%24 Oct →
inferno10–13-0.0713%23 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0119%23 Oct →
inferno13–40.0826%23 Oct →
dust21–9-0.0115%23 Oct →
dust213–6-0.0727%21 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0216%20 Oct →
inferno12–120.0518%20 Oct →
dust213–9-0.0234%20 Oct →
mirage4–13-0.056%19 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0517%19 Oct →
mirage7–90.0419%19 Oct →
dust213–3-0.0427%18 Oct →
dust213–110.0828%18 Oct →
dust23–13-0.0710%18 Oct →
mirage7–13-0.013%15 Oct →
mirage10–130.0516%15 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0319%14 Oct →
mirage13–70.0111%13 Oct →
mirage13–8-0.069%12 Oct →
anubis9–13-0.0416%12 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.0419%12 Oct →
mirage13–3-0.0414%11 Oct →
inferno13–5-0.0417%11 Oct →
cache13–00.0419%11 Oct →
ancient10–13-0.097%11 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0217%10 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0125%10 Oct →
mirage13–20.039%10 Oct →
dust213–60.0525%10 Oct →
mirage0–7-0.0821%10 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.0414%9 Oct →
dust213–110.0216%9 Oct →
mirage8–13-0.0511%9 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0716%9 Oct →
inferno13–90.0224%7 Oct →
cache12–12-0.0412%7 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0332%7 Oct →
inferno12–120.0421%7 Oct →
dust213–100.1332%6 Oct →
dust213–10-0.0410%6 Oct →
mirage11–13-0.0311%6 Oct →
cache10–130.0214%6 Oct →
anubis0–13-0.0513%5 Oct →
dust213–11-0.0515%5 Oct →
mirage13–11-0.0313%5 Oct →
anubis3–13-0.0617%5 Oct →
mirage13–00.0819%5 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0320%5 Oct →
inferno2–13-0.1022%5 Oct →
mirage13–20.0818%5 Oct →
ancient8–3-0.126%5 Oct →
dust23–13-0.1021%5 Oct →
dust28–13-0.0718%4 Oct →
mirage5–13-0.0316%4 Oct →
inferno13–11-0.034%4 Oct →
dust213–4-0.0118%3 Oct →
dust26–1-0.0222%3 Oct →
inferno12–12-0.079%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.0018%3 Oct →
mirage13–40.0716%3 Oct →
mirage9–130.0312%3 Oct →
dust212–12-0.0226%3 Oct →
inferno2–90.0018%3 Oct →
mirage10–13-0.037%2 Oct →
inferno12–120.0020%2 Oct →
inferno13–20.0419%2 Oct →
inferno11–13-0.0128%2 Oct →
ancient13–40.0111%2 Oct →
mirage13–10.0217%2 Oct →
inferno5–13-0.107%1 Oct →
mirage13–10-0.0016%30 Sept →
ancient4–00.0625%30 Sept →
inferno13–2-0.027%30 Sept →
mirage16–120.0114%30 Sept →
mirage13–30.1311%30 Sept →
dust213–11-0.0218%30 Sept →
nuke9–13-0.0519%29 Sept →
cache13–6-0.0628%29 Sept →
mirage13–3-0.076%29 Sept →
mirage3–40.0427%29 Sept →
inferno7–13-0.0515%29 Sept →
anubis2–13-0.0311%29 Sept →
dust213–10.0721%29 Sept →
dust23–13-0.0213%29 Sept →
ancient4–13-0.0821%28 Sept →

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →

This profile is built from public Steam data. If it is yours, you can remove it, or delete your CSDB account.