Dörksen

Dörksen — CS2 Stats

DE76561197979794887[U:1:19529159]Steam profile ↗✓ No bans

237Tracked matches61%Win rate2023Tracked since
2,048Hours in CS17Hrs last 2 wks
CSDB Rating6.6 SolidSupport
Premier CS Rating16,090Purple band · top ~24.1% of ranked players (population est.)
Ladder ranks via Leetify

What changed since last observed

CSDB last observed this profile on 21 Sep 2026 (2 days ago). Ranks are recorded once per day this page is viewed.

No change since then. Play, then come back: the next observation lands here.

Track this profile

CSDB reads this profile's Premier rating from its tracked match history, and records Faceit ELO once on every day the page is viewed. 32 days played since 16 Jul 2026. Come back after the next session and the change shows above.

Is this you? Sign in with Steam to claim it and connect match tracking →

Rating over time

Premier CS Rating: 16,090 +1,231 16 Jul21 Sept · 31 days played
12,39516,535peak 16,53516 Jul21 Sept
16,896Peak Premier in tracked matches
32Days played since 2026-07-16

Premier CS Rating

  • 445 below peak (16,535)
  • +2,605 over 30 days · improving
  • Next: Pink band at 20,000 3,910 to go
  • Reached: Purple band · Blue band · Light Blue band

Premier comes from this profile’s tracked match history, so it reaches back as far as those matches do.

How this compares with the same rank

Median values for Purple band among CSDB-tracked players (n=37,767), from Valve's own lifetime stats. Aim, positioning and utility scores are deliberately not benchmarked here — those are a third-party provider's derived metrics, which CSDB does not store.

MetricThis playerPurple band medianPink band medianvs Pink band
Headshot rate44.4%44.3%46.9%2.6% short
Shot accuracy17.3%11.8%13.0%above
Kill/death ratio1.021.031.080.06 short
Match win rate42.5%45.2%46.7%4.2% short

This profile matches the typical Pink band player on 1 of 4 comparable metrics.

Widest gap: Match win rate. That is the metric furthest from the Pink band median in relative terms — not necessarily the one holding a rank back, which no statistic here can establish.

Share this profile

CSDB.GGDörksenPREMIER16,090 · Purple bandcsdb.gg/stats

The image is a snapshot; the link keeps updating. Nothing here is published anywhere — it is generated in your browser when you click.

Performance scores

Aim69
Positioning63
Utility72

0–100 skill scores via Leetify.

Recent form

STEADY48484Last 10048%Win rateLWLLWWLLLW

Last 10 vs previous 10: −40pp win rate · −0.05 avg rating · −2.6pp headshot accuracy · +6ms reaction

Win rate down 40pp across the last 10 against the 10 before — more than a 10-match window's normal noise (±20pp).

Last 5 · 10 · 20 matches

Last 5

  • 23 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.00
  • Avg headshot accuracy 9%
  • Avg reaction 552ms

Last 10

  • 46 · 40% win rate
  • Avg rating -0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 14%
  • Avg reaction 538ms

Last 20

  • 128 · 60% win rate
  • Avg rating 0.01
  • Avg headshot accuracy 15%
  • Avg reaction 535ms

Newest first, from the last 100 tracked matches. Each block is its own sample — one result moves a 5-match win rate by 20 points.

Player DNA

Primary style: SupportUtility contribution stands above the rest of this profile (+2.9 against its own average).

Aim6.9
Utility7.2
Positioning6.3
Opening Duels3.8
Clutch0.0

Strong T-side opener

Style profile from tracked-match aggregates — how this player plays, not how good they are. Classification rules are deterministic and documented in code.

What this cannot see yet: which weapons you use — so CSDB cannot identify an AWPer, and no style here implies a rifle or a sniper. It also cannot see how often you take opening duels, only how often you win them, nor where you hold, so roles that depend on those (entry, lurk, anchor) are deliberately absent rather than guessed. All of it needs round-by-round demo data, which is the next thing being built.

Your pro match

NiKo

Plays most like NiKo 78% playstyle similarity

Most alike: utility contribution, positioning profile.

Where you differ: lower aim profile.

Similarity of playstyle shape across shared dimensions — it says how you play, not that you play at their level. Full comparison →

Strengths & areas to improve

Strengths

T openings. 61% T opening-duel success — entries that actually open the round.

Areas to improve

CT openings. Opening success drops from 61% on T to 37% on CT — first contacts on the defending side are being lost.

Generated by fixed rules over this profile's own numbers — no model, no guessing; silent when the sample is too small to support a claim.

CSDB Rating breakdown

Aim6.9
Positioning6.3
Utility7.2
Mechanics5.9
Opening Duels4.8
Win Impact8.6

Composite 6.6/10 (Solid), a weighted mean of the bars with a small opposition adjustment (×1.00 for this rank band). Formula versioned (v1) and documented in code.

Trends

Match rating0.01+0.01
first ⅓ avg 0.01 → last ⅓ avg 0.01
Reaction time543ms−33ms
first ⅓ avg 576ms → last ⅓ avg 543ms
Headshot accuracy16.1%−2.2%
first ⅓ avg 18.4% → last ⅓ avg 16.1%

Rolling 5-match average across the last 100 tracked matches, oldest to newest. The delta compares the first third of the window with the last.

Personal bests

0.23Best match rating · 13–1 · anubis, 22 Jul
36%Best headshot accuracy · 12–12 · nuke, 5 Sept
406msFastest reaction time · 13–3 · dust2, 13 Sept
13–1Biggest win · anubis, 1 Sept

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Highlights

8Longest win streak
56In matches decided by ≤2 rounds
8Overtime games

Map breakdown

ancientBest map · 71% over 17mirageWeakest map · 20% over 5
MapGradePlayedRecordWin rateAvg rating
dust2B36191753%0.01
infernoC24101442%-0.01
ancientS1712571%-0.00
anubisC135838%0.02
mirageD51420%-0.01
nuke2020%-0.03
cache21150%0.03
fachwerk1010%-0.03

Across the last 100 tracked matches.

Mirage is currently your weakest sufficiently-sampled map (20% over 5). Start with the 6 essential Mirage lineups, review the callouts, then spin up a practice server.

Lifetime stats

60,498Lifetime kills
1.02K/D
2,929Matches
42.5%Match win rate
44.4%Headshot % · Top 50% of Purple band
17.3%Shot accuracy · Top 25% of Purple band
6,855MVPs
1,275Hours (in match)
3,305Bombs planted
650Bombs defused

Most-used weapons

Lifetime map wins

8,461dust2
3,156inferno
1,552cbble
1,202train
971nuke
293vertigo
136office
128aztec

Lifetime totals via Steam — visible because this profile's game details are public. Spans CS:GO and CS2.

Faceit stats

Combat

278Matches
51%Win rate
1.08Avg K/D
73.0ADR
41%Headshot %

Clutches & streaks

0%1v1 clutch win
0%1v2 clutch win
8Longest win streak

Recent Faceit resultsWLLLL

MapMatchesWin rateAvg K/DAvg kills
Dust220%0.8612.5
Mirage10%0.569.0

Faceit-match stats via the FACEIT Data API — a separate match pool from the sections above.

Skill profile

Aggregate performance across tracked matches — stats via Leetify. Percentile context against other CSDB-tracked players arrives as our own benchmark data accumulates.

15.5%Headshot accuracy
35.3%Accuracy (enemy spotted)
36.5%Spray accuracy
76.4%Counter-strafing
9.5°Preaim
541msReaction time
60.8%T opening success
37.3%CT opening success
0.67Enemies flashed / flash
7.5%Flash assists
10.26HE damage / grenade
15.16Flashes / match

Recommended for you

Chosen by comparing your tracked metrics against the thresholds we flag — the measurement behind each one is shown, so you can disagree with it.

  1. Advanced Mechanics

    Losing the first CT duel repeatedly usually means holding angles that favour the peeker.

    CT opening duels 37.2729% — below the 40% mark we flag

Spend your practice time on Mirage

Map knowledge compounds faster than mechanics — lineups and callouts you learn once keep paying out every time the map comes up.

20% win rate across 5 tracked games — your weakest map with enough games to be worth reading into.

Mirage callouts & strategyMirage grenade lineups

Recent matches

MapScoreRatingHS%Date
ancient6–13-0.019%21 Sept
dust213–90.075%21 Sept
ancient8–13-0.019%20 Sept
inferno8–13-0.043%20 Sept
anubis13–7-0.0120%20 Sept
dust213–10-0.0313%15 Sept
inferno8–13-0.0413%15 Sept
ancient5–13-0.0627%15 Sept
dust211–130.0416%15 Sept
inferno13–50.0023%15 Sept
ancient13–2-0.0210%14 Sept
ancient13–90.089%14 Sept
dust213–60.0612%14 Sept
inferno13–80.0126%14 Sept
dust213–60.1419%14 Sept
dust213–30.0529%13 Sept
dust213–20.049%13 Sept
mirage5–13-0.0116%13 Sept
dust210–130.0416%11 Sept
inferno13–5-0.0218%11 Sept
dust213–40.0830%11 Sept
inferno15–15-0.046%11 Sept
dust27–13-0.0417%10 Sept
dust25–13-0.078%9 Sept
dust29–13-0.0113%9 Sept
inferno13–60.2019%9 Sept
dust216–140.0122%8 Sept
inferno15–15-0.0115%8 Sept
anubis13–100.0520%7 Sept
dust213–90.0019%7 Sept
mirage4–13-0.0519%6 Sept
ancient13–50.0528%6 Sept
nuke5–13-0.0314%6 Sept
dust25–130.026%6 Sept
ancient16–14-0.0019%5 Sept
anubis3–13-0.0124%5 Sept
inferno5–13-0.087%5 Sept
anubis4–13-0.0514%5 Sept
dust210–130.0027%5 Sept
nuke12–12-0.0336%5 Sept
anubis10–130.0217%3 Sept
inferno13–8-0.0022%3 Sept
anubis13–10-0.0414%2 Sept
inferno9–13-0.0223%2 Sept
dust213–90.0222%2 Sept
ancient13–6-0.0216%2 Sept
inferno13–50.0415%1 Sept
anubis13–10.1113%1 Sept
dust213–11-0.0122%1 Sept
dust211–130.0217%1 Sept
ancient13–9-0.0118%31 Aug
inferno13–20.0311%31 Aug
dust213–110.0327%31 Aug
dust26–13-0.0223%31 Aug
mirage2–13-0.0311%30 Aug
anubis10–130.029%30 Aug
dust27–130.0222%30 Aug
dust213–60.0633%26 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0422%26 Aug
dust216–13-0.0314%26 Aug
dust28–13-0.0913%22 Aug
anubis1–13-0.0317%22 Aug
anubis8–13-0.0810%22 Aug
ancient13–40.0310%19 Aug
dust210–13-0.018%19 Aug
dust27–13-0.0614%19 Aug
mirage13–50.0516%19 Aug
cache13–100.0419%19 Aug
dust213–4-0.0015%17 Aug
inferno13–4-0.0319%17 Aug
inferno7–130.0128%16 Aug
dust213–50.0728%16 Aug
ancient13–30.0325%16 Aug
anubis11–13-0.0214%14 Aug
inferno13–9-0.0022%10 Aug
ancient7–13-0.0228%10 Aug
inferno7–13-0.0022%3 Aug
dust25–13-0.1029%3 Aug
inferno11–13-0.0624%24 Jul
anubis15–150.0719%24 Jul
ancient13–110.0116%23 Jul
dust29–13-0.0119%23 Jul
fachwerk6–13-0.0315%23 Jul
cache13–160.0217%22 Jul
anubis13–10.2319%22 Jul
inferno11–130.0222%22 Jul
ancient13–40.0217%22 Jul
dust213–40.1717%22 Jul
mirage13–16-0.006%22 Jul
inferno9–130.0016%21 Jul
dust213–60.0321%20 Jul
ancient4–13-0.079%20 Jul
inferno13–6-0.0216%20 Jul
dust27–13-0.028%17 Jul
inferno8–13-0.0720%17 Jul
dust29–13-0.0021%17 Jul
dust213–9-0.0511%16 Jul
inferno7–130.0021%16 Jul
ancient13–60.0513%16 Jul
ancient13–6-0.0913%16 Jul

Match data via Leetify.

Recent teammates

Milestones

100 Matches
Compare this player with someone →Inventory value for this account →Where does this rating sit? Premier rank tiers →